Skip to main content
Log in

Underwater image restoration by means of blind deconvolution approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Optoelectronics in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the use of blind deconvolution of image restoration is a widely known concept, little literatures have discussed in detail its application in the problem of restoration of underwater range-gated laser images. With the knowledge of the point spread function (PSF) and modulation transfer function (MTF) of water, underwater images can be better restored or enhanced. We first review image degradation process and Wells’ small angle approximation theory, and then provide an image enhancement method for our underwater laser imaging system by blind deconvolution method based on small angle approximation. We also introduce a modified normalized mean square error (NMSE) method to validate the convergence of the blind deconvolution algorithm which is applied in our approach. The results of different initial guess of blind deconvolution are compared and discussed. Moreover, restoration results are obtained and discussed by intentionally changing the MTF parameters and using non-model-based PSF as the initial guess.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hou W, Lee Z, Weidemann A D. Why does the secchi disk disappear? An imaging perspective. Optics Express, 2007, 15(6): 2791–2802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hou W, Gray D J, Weidemann A D, Fournier G R, Forand J L. Automated underwater image restoration and retrieval of related optical properties. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 2007, 1889–1892

  3. Wells W H. Theory of small angle scattering. AGARD Lecture Series, 1973, 61

  4. Hou W, Gray D J, Weidemann A D, Arnone R A. Comparison and validation of point spread models for imaging in natural waters. Optics Express, 2008, 16(13): 9958–9965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moran S E, Ulich B L, Elkins W P, Strittmatter R J, DeWeert M J. Intensified CCD (ICCD) dynamic range and noise performance. Proceedings of SPIE, 1997, 3173: 430–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lane R G. Blind deconvolution of speckle images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1992, 9(9): 1508–1514

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Richardson W H. Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1972, 62(1): 55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucy L B. An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. The Astronomical Journal, 1974, 79(6): 745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fish D A, Brinicombe A M, Pike E R, Walker J G. Blind deconvolution by means of the Richardson-Lucy algorithm. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1995, 12(1): 58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez R C, Woods R E. Digital Image Processing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pratt W K. Digital Image Processing: PIKS Scientific Inside. 4th ed. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang J, Zhang Q, He G. Blind deconvolution: multiplicative iterative algorithm. Optics Letters, 2008, 33(1): 25–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kecheng Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, F., Yang, K., Xia, M. et al. Underwater image restoration by means of blind deconvolution approach. Front. Optoelectron. China 3, 169–178 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-010-0012-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-010-0012-1

Keywords

Navigation