Advertisement

Radiological Physics and Technology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 184–191 | Cite as

Dosimetric changes with computed tomography automatic tube-current modulation techniques

  • Sofia Spampinato
  • Anna Maria Gueli
  • Pietro Milone
  • Luigi Angelo Raffaele
Article

Abstract

The study is aimed at a verification of dose changes for a computed tomography automatic tube-current modulation (ATCM) technique. For this purpose, anthropomorphic phantom and Gafchromic® XR-QA2 films were used. Radiochromic films were cut according to the shape of two thorax regions. The ATCM algorithm is based on noise index (NI) and three exam protocols with different NI were chosen, of which one was a reference. Results were compared with dose values displayed by the console and with Poisson statistics. The information obtained with radiochromic films has been normalized with respect to the NI reference value to compare dose percentage variations. Results showed that, on average, the information reported by the CT console and calculated values coincide with measurements. The study allowed verification of the dose information reported by the CT console for an ATCM technique. Although this evaluation represents an estimate, the method can be a starting point for further studies.

Keywords

Noise index Radiochromic films CTDI DLP Anthropomorphic phantom 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed.

Statement of animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU report no. 87: radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. J ICRU. 2012;12(1):1–149.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee CH, Goo JM, Lee HL, Ye SJ, Park CM, Chun EJ, Im JG. Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. RadioGraphics. 2008;28:1451–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Schmidt B, Westerman BL, Morgan HT, Saini S. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology. 2004;233(3):649–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Söderberg M, Gunnarsson M. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography—an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Acta Radiol. 2010;51(6):625–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin CJ, Sookpeng S. Setting up computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems. J Radiol Prot. 2016;36(3):R74–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schindera ST, Nelson RC, Toth TL, Nguyen GT, Toncheva GI, DeLong DM, Yoshizumi TT. Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(2):W100–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Israel GM, Cicchiello L, Brink J, Huda W. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control. AJR. 2010;195:1342–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meeson S, Alvey CM, Golding SJ. The in vivo relationship between cross-sectional area and CT dose index in abdominal multidetector CT with automatic exposure control. J Radiol Prot. 2010;30(2):139–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sookpeng S, Martin CJ, Gentle D. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests. J Radiol Prot. 2013;33(4):735–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, Suess C, Hildebolt C. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. Radiology. 2004;233(2):515–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verdun FR, Lepori D, Monnin P, Valley JF, Schnyder P, Gudinchet F. Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominal examinations. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(5):835–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    http://www3.gehealthcare.co.uk. Accessed 6 Apr 2018.
  13. 13.
    http://www.gafchromic.com. Accessed 6 Apr 2018.
  14. 14.
    Brady S, Yoshizumi T, Toncheva G, Frus D. Implementation of radiochromic film dosimetry protocol for volumetric dose assessments to various organs during diagnostic CT procedures. Med Phys. 2010;37(9):4782–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sookpeng S, Butdee C. Signal-to-noise ratio and dose to the lens of the eye for computed tomography examination of the brain using an automatic tube current modulation system. Emerg Radiol. 2017;24(3):233–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kanal KM, Stewart BK, Kolokythas O, Shuman WP. Impact of operator-selected image noise index and reconstruction slice thickness on patient radiation dose in 64-MDCT. AJR. 2007;189:219–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spampinato S (2016) Radiochromic film dosimetry in computed tomography. Unpublished thesis, Specialization School in Medical Physics, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rampado O, Garelli E, Deagostini S, Ropolo R. Dose and energy dependence of response of Gafchromic XR-QA film for kilovoltage X-ray beams. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:2871–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tomic N, Quintero C, Whiting BR, Aldelaijan S, Bekerat H, Liang L, DeBlois F, Seuntjens J, Devic S. Characterization of calibration curves and energy dependence GafChromic™ XR-QA2 model based radiochromic film dosimetry system. Med Phys. 2014;41(6):062105-1–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Di Lillo F, Mettivier G, Sarno A, Tromba G, Tomic N, Devic S, Russo P. Energy dependent calibration of XR-QA2 radiochromic film with monochromatic and polychromatic X-ray beam. Med Phys. 2016;43:583–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rampado O, Garelli E, Ropolo R. Computed tomography dose measurements with radiochromic films and a flatbed scanner. Med Phys. 2010;37(1):189–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giaddui T, Cui Y, Galvin J, Yu Y, Xiao Y. Characteristics of Gafchromic XRQA2 films for kV image dose measurement. Med Phys. 2012;39(2):842–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Asero G, Greco C, Gueli AM, Raffaele L, Spampinato S. Evaluation of spatial resolution in image acquisition by optical flatbed scanners for radiochromic film dosimetry. JINST. 2016;11:P03024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Moro L, Panizza D, D’Ambrosio D, Carne I. Considerations on an automatic computed tomography tube current modulation system. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2013;156(4):525–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huda W, Mettler FA. Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology. 2011;258(1):236–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Size-specific dose estimates in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. AAPM report no. 204. ISBN: 978-1-936366-08-8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2014) Use of water equivalent diameter for calculating patient size and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in CT. AAPM report no. 220. ISBN: 978-1-936366-39-2.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM Jr. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics. 2006;26:503–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia Spampinato
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Anna Maria Gueli
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pietro Milone
    • 2
    • 3
  • Luigi Angelo Raffaele
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.PH3DRA Laboratories (PHysics for Dating Diagnostic Dosimetry Research and Applications), Dipartimento di Fisica e AstronomiaUniversità di Catania and INFN-CataniaCataniaItaly
  2. 2.Scuola di Specializzazione in Fisica Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze mediche chirurgiche e tecnologie avanzate “G. F. Ingrassia”, Scuola Facoltà di MedicinaCataniaItaly
  3. 3.Unità Operativa Complessa di Radiodiagnostica e RadioterapiaAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Catania, P. O. Gaspare RodolicoCataniaItaly
  4. 4.Department of OncologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations