Skip to main content
Log in

Minimum requirements for commissioning and long-term quality assurance of Elekta multi-leaf collimator for volumetric modulated arc therapy

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have proposed minimum requirements for commissioning and long-term quality assurance (QA) of an Elekta multi-leaf collimator (MLC) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The MLC leaf position accuracy during VMAT delivery was evaluated with the use of three different QA test plans: (1) a leaf gap-width test between opposing leaves by measurement of the isocenter dose during constant-gap sliding-window delivery with varied dose rates, MLC leaf speeds, and gantry angles; (2) a leaf position test by picket-fence delivery with and without gantry rotation; and (3) a leaf-bank symmetry test by measurement of the field geometry with different collimator angles at a fixed gantry position. All the QA test plans were created using an ERGO++ treatment-planning system. The leaf gap-width deviation was within 0.2 mm, the leaf position deviation was within 0.5 mm, and the leaf-bank symmetry error was within 0.5 mm under all the test conditions. MLC leaf position accuracy and long-term stability were confirmed by the proposed procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mu G, Ludlum E, Xia P. Impact of MLC leaf position errors on simple and complex MRT plans for head and neck cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:77–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rangel A, Dunscombe P. Tolerances on MLC leaf position accuracy for IMRT delivery with a dynamic MLC. Med Phys. 2009;36:3304–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palta JR, Kim S, Li JG, Liu C. Tolerance limits and action levels for planning and delivery of IMRT. In: Palta JR and Mackie TR editors. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: the state of the art. Madison: Medical Physics Publishing; 2003.

  4. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin F, Simon W, Dresser S, Serago C, Aguirre F, Ma L, Arjomandy B, Liu C. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009;36:4197–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. LoSasso T, Chui CS, Ling CC. Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy. Med Phys. 1998;25:1919–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, Palta JR, Rosen I, Sharpe MB, Xia P, Xiao Y, Xing L, Yu CX. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. Med Phys. 2003;30:2089–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sastre-Padro M, van der Heide UA, Welleweerd H. An accurate calibration method of the multileaf collimator valid for conformal and intensity modulated radiation treatments. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:2631–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008;35:310–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. ICRU Report 83. Prescribing, recording, and reporting intensity-modulated photon-beam therapy (IMRT) International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement; 2010.

  10. Tatsumi D, Hosono MN, Nakada R, Ishii K, Tsutsumi S, Inoue M, Ichida T, Miki Y. Direct impact analysis of multi-leaf collimator leaf position errors on dose distributions in volumetric modulated arc therapy: a pass rate calculation between measured planar doses with and without the position errors. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:N237–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ling CC, Zhang P, Archambault Y, Bocanek J, Tang G, Losasso T. Commissioning and quality assurance of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:575–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bedford JL, Warrington AP. Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:537–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dobler B, Groeger C, Treutwein M, Alvarez-Moret J, Goetzfried T, Weidner K, Haertl P, Koelbl O. Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in a dual-vendor environment. Radiother Oncol. 2011;99:86–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jordan TJ, Williams PC. The design and performance characteristics of a multileaf collimator. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:231–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr Kiyoshi Yoda of Elekta KK for his guidance and encouragement. The authors also wish to express their gratitude to Mr. Masanori Miyazawa of R-TECH for his dedicated efforts to provide additional film data analysis functions in their software product, the DD system. They would further like to thank the staff of the Osaka City University Hospital, who helped them during the study. This study was partially supported by a grant from Elekta KK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisaku Tatsumi.

About this article

Cite this article

Tatsumi, D., Nakada, R., Yomoda, A. et al. Minimum requirements for commissioning and long-term quality assurance of Elekta multi-leaf collimator for volumetric modulated arc therapy. Radiol Phys Technol 6, 98–106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-012-0175-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-012-0175-0

Keywords

Navigation