Abstract
In this paper, we use a mean-reverting Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process to model the stochastic perturbations in the environment, and then a stochastic mutualism model with saturation effect and pulse toxicant input in a polluted environment is proposed. A set of sufficient conditions including exponential extinction, persistence in the mean, permanence in time average and stochastic permanence are derived. Numerical simulations are worked out to support the analysis results. Also, we look at the effects of the volatile intensity, reversion rate, impulsive period and impulsive toxicant input amount on the survival of two species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nelson, S.A.: The problem of oil population of the sea. Adv. Mar. Biol. 8, 215–306 (1971)
Jensen, A.L., Marshall, J.S.: Application of a surplus production model to assess environmental impacts on exploited populations of Daphnia pluex in the laboratory. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A 28, 273–280 (1982)
Shukla, J.B., Freedman, H.I., Pal, V.M., Misra, O.P., Agarwal, M., Shukla, A.: Degradation and subsequent regeneration of a forestry resource: a mathematical model. Ecol. Model. 44, 219–229 (1989)
Hallam, T.G., Clark, C.E., Lassiter, R.R.: Effects of toxicant on population: a qualitative approach I. Equilibrium environmental exposure. Ecol. Model. 18, 291–304 (1983)
Hallam, T.G., Ma, Z.E.: Persistence in population models with demographic fluctuations. J. Math. Biol. 24, 327–339 (1986)
Ma, Z.E., Song, B.J., Hallam, T.G.: The threshold of survival for systems in a fluctuating environment. Bull. Math. Biol. 51, 311–323 (1989)
Freedman, H.I., Shukla, J.B.: Models for the effect of toxicant in single-species and predator–prey systems. J. Math. Biol. 30, 15–30 (1991)
Thomas, D.M., Snell, T.W., Jaffer, S.M.: A control problem in a polluted environment. Math. Biosci. 133, 139–163 (1996)
Chattopadhyay, J.: Effect of toxic substances on a two-species competitive system. Ecol. Model. 84, 287–289 (1996)
He, J.W., Wang, K.: The survival analysis for a popuation in a polluted environment. Nonlinear Anal. RWA 10, 1555–1571 (2009)
Dubey, B., Hussain, J.: Modelling the interaction of two biological species in a polluted environment. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 246, 58–79 (2000)
Johnston, E.L., Keough, M.J.: Field assessment of effects of timing and frequency of copper pulses on settlement of sessile marine invertebrates. Mar. Biol. 137, 1017–1029 (2000)
Liu, B., Chen, L.S., Zhang, Y.J.: The effects of impulsive toxicant input on a population in a polluted environment. J. Biol. Syst. 11, 265–274 (2003)
Yang, X.F., Jin, Z., Xue, Y.K.: Weak average persistence and extinction of a predator–prey system in a polluted environment with impulsive toxicant input. Chaos Solitons Fractals 31, 726–735 (2007)
Liu, B., Zhang, L.: Dynamics of a two-species Lotka–Volterra competition system in a polluted environment with pulse toxicant input. Appl. Math. Comput. 214, 155–162 (2009)
Jiao, J.J., Long, W., Chen, L.S.: A single stage-structured population model with mature individuals in a polluted environment and pulse input of environmental toxin. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 10, 3073–3081 (2009)
Wang, X.H., Jia, J.W.: Dynamic of a delayed predator–prey model with birth pulse and impulsive harvesting in a polluted environment. Phys. A 422, 1–15 (2015)
Li, D.M., Guo, T., Xu, Y.J.: The effects of impulsive toxicant input on a single-species population in a small polluted environment. Math. Biosci. Eng. 16, 8179–8194 (2019)
May, R.M.: Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2001)
Liu, M., Wang, K., Wu, Q.: Survival analysis of stochastic competitive models in a polluted environment and stochastic competitive exclusion principle. Bull. Math. Biol. 73, 1969–2012 (2011)
Han, Q.X., Jiang, D.Q., Ji, C.Y.: Analysis of a delayed stochastic predator–prey model in a polluted environment. Appl. Math. Model. 38, 3067–3080 (2014)
Liu, M., Bai, C.Z.: Persistence and extinction of a stochastic cooperative model in a polluted environment with pulse toxicant input. Filomat 29, 1329–1342 (2015)
Zhang, S.W., Tan, D.J.: Dynamics of a stochastic predator–prey system in a polluted environment with pulse toxicant input and impulsive perturbations. Appl. Math. Model. 39, 6319–6331 (2015)
Liu, Q., Chen, Q.M.: Dynamics of stochastic delay Lotka–Volterra systems with impulsive toxicant input and Lévy noise in polluted environments. Appl. Math. Comput. 256, 52–67 (2015)
Zhao, Y., Yuan, S.L., Ma, J.L.: Survival and stationary distribution analysis of a stochastic competitive model of three species in a polluted environment. Bull. Math. Biol. 77, 1285–1326 (2015)
Zhao, W.C., Li, J., Zhang, T.Q., Meng, X.Z., Zhang, T.H.: Persistence and ergodicty of plant disease model with Markov conversion and impulsive toxicant input. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 48, 70–84 (2017)
Wei, F.Y., Geritz, S.A.H., Cai, J.Y.: A stochastic single-species population model with partial pollution tolerance in a polluted environment. Appl. Math. Lett. 63, 130–136 (2017)
Wei, F.Y., Chen, L.H.: Psychological effect on single-species population models in a polluted environment. Math. Biosci. 290, 22–30 (2017)
Zhao, Y., Yuan, S.L.: Optimal harvesting policy of a stochastic two-species competitive model with Lévy noise in a polluted environment. Phys. A 477, 20–33 (2017)
Liu, M., Du, C.X., Deng, M.L.: Persistence and extinction of a modified Leslie–Gower Holling-type II stochastic predator–prey model with impulsive toxicant input in polluted environments. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 27, 177–190 (2018)
Chi, M.N., Zhao, W.C.: Dynamical analysis of multi-nutrient and single microorganism chemostat model in a polluted environment. Adv. Differ. Equ. 120, 16 (2018)
Lv, X.J., Meng, X.Z., Wang, X.Z.: Extinction and stationary distribution of an impulsive stochastic chemostat model with nonlinear perturbation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 110, 273–279 (2018)
Gao, Y.X., Tian, S.Q.: Dynamics of a stochastic predator–prey model with two competitive preys and one predator in a polluted environment. Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math. 35, 861–889 (2018)
Yu, X.W., Yuan, S.L., Zhang, T.H.: Survival and ergodicity of a stochastic phytoplankton–zooplankton model with toxin-producing phytoplankton in an impulsive polluted environment. Appl. Math. Comput. 347, 249–264 (2019)
Lan, G.J., Wei, C.J., Zhang, S.W.: Long time behaviors of single-species population models with psychological effect and impulsive toxicant in polluted environments. Phys. A 521, 828–842 (2019)
Liu, G.D., Meng, X.Z.: Optimal harvesting strategy for a stochastic mutualism system in a polluted environment with regime switching. Phys. A 536, 12893 (2019)
Wang, H., Pan, F.M., Liu, M.: Survival analysis of a stochastic service-resource mutualism model in a polluted environment with pulse toxicant input. Phys. A 521, 591–606 (2019)
Allen, E.: Environmental variability and mean-reverting processes. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 21, 2073–2089 (2016)
Higham, D.J.: An algorithmic introduction to numerical simulation of stochastic diffrential equations. SIAM Rev. 43, 525–546 (2001)
Liu, Q., Jiang, D.Q., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A.: Asymptotic behavior of a food-limited Lotka–Volterra mutualism model with Markovian switching and Lévy jumps. Phys. A 505, 94–104 (2018)
Gao, H.J., Wang, Y.: Stochastic mutualism model under regime switching with Lévy jumps. Phys. A 515, 355–375 (2019)
Liu, C., Xun, X.Y., Zhang, Q.L., Li, Y.K.: Dynamical analysis and optimal control in a hybrid stochastic double delayed bioeconomic system with impulsive contaminants emission and Lévy jumps. Appl. Math. Comput. 352, 99–118 (2019)
Liu, G.D., Qi, H.K., Chang, Z.B., Meng, X.Z.: Asymptotic stability of a stochastic May mutualism system. Comput. Math. Appl. 79, 735–745 (2020)
Zhang, X.H., Jiang, D.Q.: Periodic solutions of a stochastic food-limited mutualism model. Mathodol. Comput. Appl. 22, 267–278 (2020)
Mao, X.R., Marion, G., Renshaw, E.: Environmental Brownian noise suppresses explosions in population dynamics. Stoch. Process. Appl. 97, 95–110 (2002)
Mao, X.R.: Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications. Horwood Publishing, Chichester (1997)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the editor and referees for their valuable comments and suggestions, which greatly improve the presentation of this paper. The work is supported by the NNSF of China (Nos. 11871201, 11961023) and the NSF of Hubei Province, China (No. 2019CFB241).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: The proof of Lemma 2.4
Consider the first two equations of model (1.6):
By the theory of stochastic differential equation, (A.1) has a unique local solution (u(t), v(t)) on \([0,~t_e)\), where \(t_e\) denotes the explosion time. If we can show that \(t_e=+\infty \) a.s., then \((u(t),~v(t))\in R_+^2\) a.s. for all \(t\ge 0\). To achieve this objective, let \(k_0>0\) be sufficiently large, and u(0) and v(0) lying in the interval \((1/{k_0},~k_0)\). Then define a stopping time as follows
where we set \(\inf \emptyset =+\infty \) (\(\emptyset \) denotes the empty set). Let \(t_{+\infty }=\lim _{k\rightarrow +\infty }t_k\), obviously, \(t_{+\infty }\le t_e\). If one can show that \(t_{+\infty }=+\infty \) a.s., then \(t_e=+\infty \) a.s. and \((u(t),~v(t))\in R_+^2\) a.s. for all \(t\ge 0\). To complete the proof, it is sufficient to show that \(t_{+\infty }=+\infty \) a.s.
Consider a \(C^2\)-function \(V:R_+^2\rightarrow R_+\) with the form \(V(u,v)=u-1-\ln u+v-1-\ln v\). An application of Itô’s formula can show that
where
and
It is not difficult to prove that LV is bounded. Substituting (A.3) into (A.2) yields that
The rest of the proof can be obtained by almost the same method in [45], and the details are omitted. This completes the proof.
Appendix B: The proof of Theorem 3.1
From (2.1) and Lemma 2.2, for any \(\varepsilon >0\), there exists a constant \(T>0\) such that for all \(t\ge T\),
Applying Itô’s formula to (1.6) gives
and
Integrating both sides from 0 to t, one has
and
Dividing t to both sides of above two equations yields that
and
where
Obviously, \(\lim _{t\rightarrow +\infty }f_i(t)=0\).
-
(i)
Substituting (B.1) into (B.2), we can deduce that
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{lll} \frac{1}{t}\ln \frac{u(t)}{u(0)} &{}\le {\bar{q}}_1+\frac{\varepsilon }{2}+f_1(t)-r_1\langle {\tilde{C}}_0(t)-\frac{\varepsilon }{2r_1}\rangle +b_1+\frac{1}{t}\int _0^t\xi _1(s)dW_1(s)\\ &{}\le {\bar{q}}_1+\varepsilon +f_1(t)-r_1\langle {\tilde{C}}_0(t)\rangle +b_1+\frac{1}{t}\int _0^t\xi _1(s)dW_1(s). \end{array} \end{aligned}$$(B.4)Note that \(\lim _{t\rightarrow +\infty }f_i(t)=0\). Using the strong law of large number of local martingale (see [46]) yields \(\lim _{t\rightarrow +\infty }t^{-1}\int _0^t\xi _1(s)dW_1(s)=0\). It follows from (B.4) that \(\limsup _{t\rightarrow +\infty }t^{-1}\ln u(t) \le {\bar{q}}_1-r_1\delta +b_1\). If \({\bar{q}}_1-r_1\delta +b_1<0\), then u(t) will be extinct exponentially. Similarly, when \({\bar{q}}_2-r_2\delta +b_2<0\), specie v(t) is also extinct exponentially.
-
(ii)
If \({\bar{q}}_1-r_1\delta +b_1<0\), then it follows from (1) in Definition 2.1 that \(\lim _{t\rightarrow +\infty }u(t)=0\) a.s. Thus, for any \(\varepsilon >0\), there is a constant T such that for all \(t\ge T\),
$$\begin{aligned} -\frac{\varepsilon }{2}\le b_2\langle \frac{u}{1+u}\rangle \le \frac{\varepsilon }{2},\ \ -\frac{\varepsilon }{2}\le t^{-1}\ln v(0)\le \frac{\varepsilon }{2}. \end{aligned}$$(B.5)Combining (B.1), (B.3) and (B.5) yields
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{lll} \ln v(t) &{}\le \frac{\varepsilon }{2}t+({\bar{q}}_2+\frac{\varepsilon }{2})t+tf_2(t)-r_2\langle {\tilde{C}}_0(t)-\frac{\varepsilon }{2r_2}\rangle t\\ &{}\quad -\,a_2\int _0^tv(s)ds+\frac{\varepsilon }{2}t+\int _0^t\xi _2(s)dW_2(s)\\ &{}\le tf_2(t)+({\bar{q}}_2-r_2\langle {\tilde{C}}_0(t)\rangle +2\varepsilon )t-a_2\int _0^tv(s)ds\\ &{}\quad +\,\int _0^t\xi _2(s)dW_2(s) \end{array} \end{aligned}$$(B.6)and
$$\begin{aligned} \ln v(t)\ge & {} tf_2(t)+({\bar{q}}_2-r_2\langle {\tilde{C}}_0(t)\rangle -2\varepsilon )t -a_2\int _0^tv(s)ds\nonumber \\&+\,\int _0^t\xi _2(s)dW_2(s). \end{aligned}$$(B.7)Noticing that the function \(tf_i(t)=(R_i(0)-R_{ie})(1-e^{-\alpha _it})/\alpha _i\) is bounded as \(t\rightarrow +\infty \). Making use of (1) in Lemma 2.3 to (B.6), we can deduce that \(\langle v(t)\rangle ^*\le ({\bar{q}}_2-r_2\delta +2\varepsilon )/a_2\). Similarly, we have from (2) in Lemma 2.3 and (B.7) that \(\langle v(t)\rangle _*\ge ({\bar{q}}_2-r_2\delta -2\varepsilon )/a_2\). Since \(\varepsilon \) is arbitrary, we obtain a desired assertion that \(\lim _{t\rightarrow +\infty }\langle v(t)\rangle =({\bar{q}}_2-r_2\delta )/a_2\).
-
(iii)
The proof of (iii) coincides with that of (ii), and hence is omitted.
-
(iv)
Substituting (B.1) into (B.2), one has for \(t\ge T\),
$$\begin{aligned} \ln u(t)\le & {} \ln u(0)+tf_1(t)+\big ({\bar{q}}_1-r_1\langle {\tilde{C}}_0(t)\rangle +b_1+\varepsilon \big )t\\&\quad -\,a_1\int _0^tu(s)ds+\int _0^t\xi _1(s)dW_1(s) \end{aligned}$$and
$$\begin{aligned} \ln u(t)\ge & {} \ln u(0)+tf_1(t)+({\bar{q}}_1-r_1\langle {\tilde{C}}_0(t)\rangle -\varepsilon )t\\&\quad -\,a_1\int _0^tu(s)ds+\int _0^t\xi _1(s)dW_1(s). \end{aligned}$$Applying (1) and (2) in Lemma 2.3 to the above two inequalities, we can obtain that
$$\begin{aligned} ({\bar{q}}_1-r_1\delta )/{a_1}\le \langle u(t)\rangle _*\le \langle u(t)\rangle ^*\le ({\bar{q}}_1-r_1\delta +b_1)/{a_1}. \end{aligned}$$Similarly, we can prove
$$\begin{aligned} ({\bar{q}}_2-r_2\delta )/{a_2}\le \langle v(t)\rangle _*\le \langle v(t)\rangle ^*\le ({\bar{q}}_2-r_2\delta +b_2)/{a_2}, \end{aligned}$$which completes the claim.
Appendix C: The proof of Theorem 3.2
Let’s first prove \(\liminf _{t\rightarrow +\infty }{\mathcal {P}}\{\sqrt{u^2(t)+v^2(t)}\ge \varphi \}\ge 1-\varepsilon \). Define \(V_1(u,v)=1/(u+v)\). Applying Itô’s formula leads to
By the assumption of Theorem 3.2, we can choose a constant \(\mu >0\) such that
Define \(V_2=(1+V_1)^{\mu }\). By Itô’s formula we get that
where
Assign \(\kappa >0\) sufficiently small such that
We continue to define \(V_3=e^{\kappa t}V_2\). The Itô’s formula then gives that
where
It is easy to verify that \(J_2(u,v)\) is upper bounded as \(t\rightarrow +\infty \), denoted as \(J:=\sup _{(u,v)\in R_+^2}J_2(u,v)<+\infty \). Thus,
Integrating both sides of (C.2) and then taking expectation, one has
Dividing both sides of \(e^{\kappa t}\) gives that
Therefore
from which we conclude that
Then
For any given \(\varepsilon >0\), let \(\varphi =\varepsilon ^{\frac{1}{\mu }}/K^{\frac{1}{\mu }}\), by Chebyshev’s inequality (see [46]), we have
and then \(\limsup _{t\rightarrow +\infty }{\mathcal {P}}\{\sqrt{u^2(t)+v^2(t)}<\varphi \}\le \varphi ^{\mu }K=\varepsilon \). Thus, a desirable result,
\(\liminf _{t\rightarrow +\infty }{\mathcal {P}}\{\sqrt{u^2(t)+v^2(t)}\ge \varphi \}\ge 1-\varepsilon \), is obtained. Next, we will verify that \(\liminf _{t\rightarrow +\infty }{\mathcal {P}}\{\sqrt{u^2(t)+v^2(t)}\le \phi \}\ge 1-\varepsilon \). Define \(V_4(u,v)=u^{\theta }+v^{\theta }\), \(\theta >1\). Using Itô’s formula we have
We finally define \(V_5(u,v)=e^tV_4\). Applying Itô’s formula, one can show that
where
It is easy to know that \(J_3(u,v)\) is upper bounded, denoted as \(K_1:=\sup _{(u,v)\in R_+^2}J_3<+\infty \).
Integrating both sides of (C.3) shows that
Taking expectation, one has
Namely, \(\limsup _{t\rightarrow +\infty }{\mathbb {E}}[u^\theta +v^\theta ]\le K_1\). Assign \(\phi =(2^{\theta -1}K_1)^\frac{1}{\theta }/\varepsilon ^{\frac{1}{\theta }}\), we derive, by Chebyshev’s inequality (see [46]) again, that
Then we know that \(\limsup _{t\rightarrow +\infty }{\mathcal {P}}\{\sqrt{u^2(t)+v^2(t)}>\phi \}\le \varepsilon \). So the required assertion follows as \(\liminf _{t\rightarrow +\infty }{\mathcal {P}}\{\sqrt{u^2(t)+v^2(t)}\le \phi \}\ge 1-\varepsilon \).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ning, W., Liu, Z., Wang, L. et al. A stochastic mutualism model with saturation effect and impulsive toxicant input in a polluted environment. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 65, 177–197 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-020-01387-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-020-01387-8
Keywords
- Impulsive stochastic mutualism model
- Polluted environment
- Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process
- Permanence
- Extinction