This paper aims to analyze the patterns of poverty and housing overcrowding among immigrant children in Finland. We seek to explore whether and to what degree foreign-born children are disadvantaged relative to native children in terms of income poverty and overcrowded housing. Another main objective is to study the patterns of immigrant child poverty and overcrowding in the first years of settlement. We distinguish between four different types of poverty trajectories in the first 5 years after arrival in Finland: (1) no experience of poverty; (2) poor in up to two out of 5 years following arrival (mostly non-poor); (3) poor in three or four out of 5 years following arrival (mostly poor); and (4) poor in all 5 years (chronic poverty). An analogous classification is applied when looking at housing overcrowding. We use data from a compilation of Finnish registers, which contain annual information on all individuals who resided in Finland at any point between 1995 and 2014. The results of a series of logistic regressions show that the disadvantage of immigrant children relative to native children is more pronounced in terms of income poverty than in terms of housing. The most frequent outcome in terms of income poverty in the first years of settlement is no experience of poverty, followed by chronic poverty, i.e., poverty in all 5 years after arrival. The same patterns are found for overcrowding. The multivariate analyses, based on generalized ordered logistic regressions, show substantial heterogeneity across immigrant groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
We include only foreign-born children who stayed in Finland for at least five full consecutive years. The outcomes for the children who leave Finland before that are on average slightly less favorable than those of children who stay in Finland. However, the difference is not large enough to affect the main conclusions of this study.
The output of a generalized ordered logistic regression is similar to that of a series of binary logistic regressions. In our poverty analysis, the first panel in Table 1 contrasts outcome 1 with outcomes 2, 3, and 4 (therefore labeled “at least some poverty vs. no poverty”); the second panel contrasts outcomes 1 and 2 with outcomes 3 and 4 (therefore labeled “mostly poor or chronic poverty vs. more favorable outcomes”); and the third panel contrasts outcomes 1, 2 and 3 with outcome 4 (therefore labeled “chronic poverty vs. more favorable outcomes”). The output of the overcrowding analysis is organized in the same manner.
Excluding these children from the poverty analysis does not affect the main conclusions. The poverty trajectories of the children excluded from the overcrowding analysis are fairly similar to those of the included children.
One shortcoming of information on education in Finnish registers is that it is not possible to distinguish between individuals with less than upper secondary school and individuals for whom the education level is unknown. This is why they are considered a single group in this study.
For the detailed regional classification, see: http://tilastokeskus.fi/meta/luokitukset/maakunta/001-2017/index_en.html
Foreign-born individuals of Finnish ancestry born in the former USSR belong primarily to the Ingrian-Finnish community. Although officially considered returnees (Liebkind and Jasinskaja-Lahti, 2000), the parents of most of these children never lived in the area defined by the present-day borders of Finland. This is an important distinction from the children of Finnish-born migrants returning from Sweden or other Western countries. This is why, in this paper, the children with Finnish backgrounds born in the former USSR are, depending on their reported native language, assigned to the groups “former USSR, Finnish language” or “former USSR, Russian language”.
In order to avoid the collinearity between arrival cohorts and immigrant groups, children born in the countries that gained independence in the 1990s are also assigned to the group defined by the borders of former countries, i.e., the USSR or Yugoslavia. For instance, an Estonian-speaking child born in Estonia in 1995 is classified as “former USSR, Estonian language”.
Results not reported, but can be obtained upon request
Andersen, H. S., Turner, L. M., & Søholt, S. (2013). The special importance of housing policy for ethnic minorities: Evidence from a comparison of four Nordic countries. International Journal of Housing Policy, 13(1), 20–44.
Auspurg, K., Schneck, A., & Hinz, T. (2019). Closed doors everywhere? A meta-analysis of field experiments on ethnic discrimination in rental housing markets. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(1), 95–114.
Blomgren, J., Hiilamo, H., Kangas, O., et al. (2012). Growing inequalities and their impact in Finland. Country Report for Finland. GINI. Amsterdam: AIAS.
Bradbury, B., & Jäntti, M. (2001). Child poverty across twenty-five countries. In B. Bradbury, S. P. Jenkins, & J. Micklewright (Eds.), The dynamics of child poverty in industrialised countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bradbury, B., Jenkins, S. P., & Micklewright, J. (2001). Beyond the snapshot. In B. Bradbury, S. P. Jenkins, & J. Micklewright (Eds.), The dynamics of child poverty in industrialised countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Busk, H., Jauhiainen, S., Kekäläinen A., Nivalainen, S., & Tähtinen, T. (2016). Immigrants on the labour market – a study of the working lives of immigrants arriving in Finland in different years. [in Finnish] Finnish Centre for Pensions, Studies 06/2016.
Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Corak, M. (2006). Principles and practicalities for measuring child poverty. International Social Security Review, 59(2), 3–35.
Dhalmann, H., & Vilkama, K. (2009). Housing policy and the ethnic mix in Helsinki, Finland: Perceptions of city officials and Somali immigrants. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(4), 423–439.
Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development. Child Development, 71(1), 188–196.
Eskelä, E. (2018). Housing pathways of skilled migrants: Indian professionals in Helsinki, Finland. Housing, Theory and Society, 35(4), 474–494.
Evans, G. W., Saegert, S., & Harris, R. (2001). Residential density and psychological health among children in low-income families. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 165–180.
Eurostat (2012). Ad hoc module “housing conditions”. Access method: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/File:Average_size_of_dwelling_by_tenure_status,_2012.png
Eurostat (2017). Housing conditions. Access method: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Housing_conditions
Eurostat (2019). Housing price statistics – house price index. Access method: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Housing_price_statistics_-_house_price_index#Long_term_trends_in_House_prices_and_rents
Galloway, T. A., Gustafsson, B., Pedersen, P. J., & Österberg, T. (2015). Immigrant child poverty–the Achilles heel of the Scandinavian welfare state. Measurement of poverty, deprivation, and economic mobility (pp. 185–219). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Gornick, J. C., & Jäntti, M. (2012). Child poverty in cross-national perspective: Lessons from the Luxembourg income study. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(3), 558–568.
Gulan, A., Haavio, M., & Kilponen, J. (2014). Kiss me deadly: From Finnish great depression to great recession. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper, (24).
Gustafsson, B., & Österberg, T. (2018). How are immigrant children in Sweden faring? Mean income, affluence and poverty since the 1980s. Child Indicators Research, 11(1), 329–353.
Heikkilä, E. (2005). Mobile vulnerabilities: Perspectives on the vulnerabilities of immigrants in the Finnish labour market. Population, Space and Place, 11(6), 485–497.
Jenkins, S. P., & Schluter, C. (2003). Why are child poverty rates higher in Britain than in Germany? A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Human Resources, 38(2), 441–465.
Karvonen, S., & Salmi, M. (Eds.). (2016). Lapsiköyhyys Suomessa 2010-luvulla. Työpaperi 30/2016. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos.
Katila, S., & Wahlbeck, Ö. (2012). The role of (transnational) social capital in the start-up processes of immigrant businesses: The case of Chinese and Turkish restaurant businesses in Finland. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 294–309.
Kauppinen, T. M., & Vilkama, K. (2016). Entry to homeownership among immigrants: A decomposition of factors contributing to the gap with native-born residents. Housing Studies, 31(4), 463–488.
Kauppinen, T. M., & van Ham, M. (2019). Unravelling the demographic dynamics of ethnic residential segregation. Population, Space and Place, 25(2), e2193.
Kuivalainen, S., & Nelson, K. (2012). Eroding minimum income protection in the Nordic countries? Reassessing the Nordic model of social assistance. In J. Kvist, J. Fritzell, B. Hvinden, et al. (Eds.), Changing social equality: The Nordic welfare model in the 21st century (pp. 69–88). Bristol: Policy Press.
Larja, L., Warius, J., Sundbäck, L., Liebkind, K., Kandolin, I., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2012). Discrimination in the Finnish labor market: An overview and a field experiment on recruitment. Publications of the ministry of employment and the economy, employment and entrepreneurship 12/2012.
Leventhal, T., & Newman, S. (2010). Housing and child development. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(9), 1165–1174.
Lichter, D. T. (1997). Poverty and inequality among children. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 121–145.
Liebkind, K., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2000). The influence of experiences of discrimination on psychological stress: A comparison of seven immigrant groups. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10(1), 1–16.
Liebkind, K., Larja, L., & Brylka, A. A. (2016). Ethnic and gender discrimination in recruitment: Experimental evidence from Finland. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(1), 403–426.
Lindquist, M. J., & Lindquist, G. S. (2012). The dynamics of child poverty in Sweden. Journal of Population Economics, 25(4), 1423–1450.
Moisio, P., Lehtelä, K. M., & Mukkila, S. (2016). Poverty reduction effects of taxation and benefit policies in Finland, 1993–2013. European Journal of Social Security, 18(1), 30–45.
Nelson, K. (2013). Social assistance and EU poverty thresholds 1990–2008. Are European welfare systems providing just and fair protection against low income? European Sociological Review, 29(2), 386–401.
Nyby, J., Nygård, M., Autto, J., & Kuisma, M. (2017). Freedom of choice, gender equality, or employment promotion? Finnish party positions on childcare in the light of election manifestos 2015. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(3), 279–297.
Obućina, O. (2014). Paths into and out of poverty among immigrants in Sweden. Acta Sociologica, 57(1), 5–23.
Öblom, A., & Antfolk, J. (2017). Ethnic and gender discrimination in the private rental housing market in Finland: A field experiment. PLoS One, 12(8), e0183344.
OECD. (2011). Divided we stand why inequality keeps rising: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2018a). OECD economic surveys: Finland. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2018b). Working together: Skills and labour market integration of immigrants and their children in Finland. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Saarela, J., & Finnäs, F. (2009). Return migrant status and employment in Finland. International Journal of Manpower, 30(5), 489–506.
Sarvimäki, M. (2011). Assimilation to a welfare state: Labor market performance and use of social benefits by immigrants to Finland. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(3), 665–688.
Sarvimäki, M. (2017). Labor market integration of refugees in Finland. Helsinki: VATT Institute for Economic Research. VATT research reports, 185.
Seccombe, K. (2000). Families in poverty in the 1990s: Trends, causes, consequences, and lessons learned. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1094–1113.
Solari, C. D., & Mare, R. D. (2012). Housing crowding effects on children’s wellbeing. Social Science Research, 41(2), 464–476.
Statistics Finland (2019). Foreign-language speakers. Access method: https://www.stat.fi/tup/maahanmuutto/maahanmuuttajat-vaestossa/vieraskieliset_en.html
TARKI. (2010). Child poverty and child wellbeing in the European Union. Report prepared for the DG employment, social affairs and equal opportunities (unite E.2) of the European Commission. Budapest: TARKI.
Adamson P. (2012). Measuring child poverty – new league tables of child poverty in the world’s rich countries. Innocenti Research Centre, Report Card, 10.
Vaalavuo, M. (2015). Poverty dynamics in Europe: From what to why. In DG EMPL working paper 03/2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Van Hook, J., Brown, S. I., & Kwenda, M. N. (2004). A decomposition of trends in poverty among children of immigrants. Demography, 41(4), 649–670.
Vilkama, K. (2011). Yhteinen kaupunki, eriytyvät kaupunginosat?: Kantaväestön ja maahanmuuttajataustaisten asukkaiden alueellinen eriytyminen ja muuttoliike pääkaupunkiseudulla. Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus, Tutkimuksia, 2011, 2.
Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82.
This work was supported by the Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland, decision number 293103, for the research consortium Tackling Inequality in Time of Austerity (TITA), by the Academy of Finland Flagship Programme, decision number 320162, and by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working life and Welfare (FORTE), grant number 2016-07105. The paper benefited from the comments of two anonymous reviewers, and from a presentation at the European Population Conference in Brussels in 2018.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Obućina, O., Ilmakunnas, I. Poverty and Overcrowding among Immigrant Children in an Emerging Destination: Evidence from Finland. Child Ind Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09743-7
- Child poverty
- Child migrants
- Immigrant housing