Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Climate and Innovative Work Behavior, the Mediating Role of the Learning Potential of the Workplace

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to explore the relationship between learning climate, in the dimensions of learning facilitation and error avoidance, learning potential of the workplace (task-related and interactional) and innovative work behavior. Survey data were collected from a sample of 374 employees and their supervisors from an automatic food distribution company in central Italy. Structural equation models have been conducted to empirically test the hypotheses. Results showed that both dimensions of learning climate were related interactional and task-related learning potential and that task-related learning potential mediated the relationship between climate and innovative behavior. Furthermore, the climatic dimension of learning facilitation had a direct relationship with innovative work behavior. Advancing from existing organizational behavior and individual learning literature, this article contributes to extend knowledge about the role of learning climate and workplace learning potential in innovative work behavior. The findings offer guidance for organizations that aim to strengthen employee-driven innovation, highlighting the importance of learning climate and potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity (Vol. 87). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Schlosser, F. (2011). Perceived organizational membership and the retention of older workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 319–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2005). Organizational learning culture, learning transfer climate and perceived innovation in Jordanian organizations. International Journal of Training and Development, 9(2), 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battistelli, A., Montani, F., & Odoardi, C. (2013). The impact of feedback from job and task autonomy in the relationship between dispositional resistance to change and innovative work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(1), 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battistelli, A., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., Di Napoli, G., & Piccione, L. (2019). Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work-based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (1994). Situated learning: a workplace experience. [Developed from a conference paper presented at the 'After Competence' Conference (1993: Brisbane)]. Australian Journal of Adult and Community Education, 34(2), 112.

  • Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practices: Co–participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 312–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., Foss, N. J., & Lyngsie, J. (2018). The “human side” of open innovation: The role of employee diversity in firm-level openness. Research Policy, 47(1), 218–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantner, U., Joel, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). The use of knowledge management by innovators: Empirical evidence for Germany (No. 2008, 002). Jena economic research papers.

  • Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Tishler, A., & Edmondson, A. C. (2012). CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organization, 10(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, W., & Jacobs, R. L. (2011). Influences of formal learning, personal learning orientation, and supportive learning environment on informal learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(3), 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzer, A. (2007). Employee perceptions of their workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(7), 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzer, A., Susomrith, P., & Ampofo, E. T. (2019). Opportunities to participate in formal and informal vocational learning activities and work-related outcomes in small professional services businesses. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 1–27.

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334.

  • Darrah, C. N. (1995). Workplace training, workplace learning: A case study. Human Organization, 31–41.

  • De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2002). Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams (pp. 255-275). Cambridge, MA: Division of research, Harvard Business School.

  • Einarsen, S., Skogstad, A., Rørvik, E., Lande, Å. B., & Nielsen, M. B. (2018). Climate for conflict management, exposure to workplace bullying and work engagement: A moderated mediation analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(3), 549–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldor, L. (2017). The relationship between perceptions of learning climate and employee innovative behavior and proficiency. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1454–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldor, L., & Harpaz, I. (2016). A process model of employee engagement: The learning climate and its relationship with extra-role performance behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellinger, A. D., & Bostrom, R. P. (2002). An examination of managers' beliefs about their roles as facilitators of learning. Management Learning, 33(2), 147–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P. E. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M., Alderton, J., Cole, G., & Senker, P. (1998). Development of knowledge and skills in employment (research report no. 5). Sussex: University of Sussex, Institute of Education.

  • Evers, C. W. (2012). Organisational contexts for lifelong learning: Individual and collective learning configurations. In Second international handbook of lifelong learning (pp. 61–76). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Foss, N. J., Lyngsie, J., & Zahra, S. A. (2013). The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1453–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. Cassell Educational Limited: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerken, M., Beausaert, S., & Segers, M. (2016). Working on professional development of faculty staff in higher education: Investigating the relationship between social informal learning activities and employability. Human Resource Development International, 19(2), 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govaerts, N., Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., & Baert, H. (2011). Influence of learning and working climate on the retention of talented employees. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23(1), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grangeat, M., & Gray, P. (2008). Teaching as a collective work: Analysis, current research and implications for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(3), 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). SEM: Confirmatory factor analysis (pp. 770–842). Upper Saddle River: Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirak, R., Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, A., Brekelmans, M., Beijaard, D., & Korthagen, F. (2009). Experienced teachers' informal learning: Learning activities and changes in behavior and cognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 663–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2004). Technology learning principles for preservice and in-service teacher education. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 4(3), 345–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jashapara, A. (2003). Cognition, culture and competition: An empirical test of the learning organization. The Learning Organization, 10(1), 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, S. J., & Joo, B. K. (2011). Knowledge sharing: The influences of learning organization culture, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(3), 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, B. K. (2010). Organizational commitment for knowledge workers: The roles of perceived organizational learning culture, leader–member exchange quality, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, B. K., & Lim, T. (2009). The effects of organizational learning culture, perceived job complexity, and proactive personality on organizational commitment and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16(1), 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessel, M., Kratzer, J., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). The process of experiential learning. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, 20–38.

  • Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., & Nijs, H. (2009). Learning conditions for non-formal and informal workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C. E., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., & Hoffman, B. J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 435–455.

  • Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning & Technology.

  • Lee, J. Y., Yoo, S., Lee, Y., Park, S., & Yoon, S. W. (2019). Individual and Organisational factors affecting knowledge workers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of informal learning: A multilevel analysis. Vocations and Learning, 1–23.

  • Lundkvist, A. H., & Gustavsson, M. (2018). Conditions for employee learning and innovation–interweaving competence development activities provided by a workplace development programme with everyday work activities in SMEs. Vocations and Learning, 11(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., Volpe, M., & Watkins, K. E. (1999). Theory and practice of informal learning in the knowledge era. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 1(3), 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, T. J. (2002). Employee learning and development orientation: Toward an integrative model of involvement in continuous learning. Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), 9–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, T. J., Mitchell, D. R., & Barbeite, F. G. (2002). Predictors of attitudes toward a 360-degree feedback system and involvement in post-feedback management development activity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2015). Reflection as a facilitator of teachers' innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(2), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montani, F., Battistelli, A., & Odoardi, C. (2017). Proactive goal generation and innovative work behavior: The moderating role of affective commitment, production ownership and leader support for innovation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(2), 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montani, F., Odoardi, C., & Battistelli, A. (2014). Individual and contextual determinants of innovative work behaviour: Proactive goal generation matters. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 645–670.

  • Nieuwenhuis, L. F., & Van Woerkom, M. (2007). Goal rationalities as a framework for evaluating the learning potential of the workplace. Human Resource Development Review, 6(1), 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhof, W. J., & Nieuwenhuis, L. (2008). The learning potential of the workplace. SENSE publishers.

  • Nikolova, I., Van Ruysseveldt, J., De Witte, H., & Syroit, J. (2014). Work-based learning: Development and validation of a scale measuring the learning potential of the workplace (LPW). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolova, I., Van Ruysseveldt, J., Van Dam, K., & De Witte, H. (2016). Learning climate and workplace learning. Journal of Personnel psychology.

  • Noe, R. A., Tews, M. J., & Marand, A. D. (2013). Individual differences and informal learning in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odoardi, C., Montani, F., Boudrias, J. S., & Battistelli, A. (2015). Linking managerial practices and leadership style to innovative work behavior: The role of group and psychological processes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(5), 545–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ-Eft, D. (2002). A typology of training design and work environment factors affecting workplace learning and transfer. Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1993). On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1990). Organizational climate and culture. Pfeiffer.

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2012). Knowing when to set learning versus performance goals. Organizational Dynamics, 1(41), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The art and practice of the learning organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipton, H., Fay, D., West, M., Patterson, M., & Birdi, K. (2005). Managing people to promote innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taverniers, J., Smeets, T., Van Ruysseveldt, J., Syroit, J., & von Grumbkow, J. (2011). The risk of being shot at: Stress, cortisol secretion, and their impact on memory and perceived learning during reality-based practice for armed officers. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(2), 113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 130–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukko, J., Hildén, S., Saunila, M., & Tikkamäki, K. (2017). Comprehensive performance measurement and management–innovativeness and performance through reflective practice. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 13(3), 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1228–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). lnnovation and creativity at work: Psychological and Organizational Strategjes. NY: John Wiley & Sons, 265-267.

  • Wielenga-meijer, E. G., Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A., & Wigboldus, D. H. (2010). From task characteristics to learning: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(5), 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2016). Ambidextrous leadership and employees' self-reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Nicola Cangialosi & Carlo Odoardi

  2. Department of Psychology EA4139, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux Cedex, France

    Adalgisa Battistelli

Authors
  1. Nicola Cangialosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlo Odoardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adalgisa Battistelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Cangialosi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cangialosi, N., Odoardi, C. & Battistelli, A. Learning Climate and Innovative Work Behavior, the Mediating Role of the Learning Potential of the Workplace. Vocations and Learning 13, 263–280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09235-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09235-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation