Zusammenfassung
Patienten mit akutem Brustschmerz stellen sich sowohl in der Praxis als auch in der Notaufnahme eines Krankenhauses häufig vor. Die Differenzialdiagnose umfasst neben kardialen Ursachen multiple andere Ursachen. Die Brustschmerzambulanzen in kardiologischen Praxen/Kliniken sind Ergänzung und wichtige Kooperationspartner der klinischen Chest-Pain-Units im Rahmen eines integrierten regionalen Versorgungskonzeptes für Patienten mit akuter Brustschmerzsymptomatik. Dort sollen akute Brustschmerzen im Hinblick auf mögliche kardiale oder thorakal-vaskuläre Ursachen zeitnah und mit hoher fachlicher Kompetenz abgeklärt werden. In diesem Konsensuspapier werden die organisatorischen Strukturmerkmale und Versorgungspfade für die Etablierung von Brustschmerzambulanzen und ihre Zertifizierung durch die DGK beschrieben.
Abstract
Chest pain is one of the most common problems in ambulatory settings as well as in emergency rooms of hospitals. The so-called “Brustschmerz-Ambulanzen”, which is the German translation of “outpatient clinics for chest pain”, are the ambulatory correlates of clinical chest pain units. The Brustschmerz-Ambulanzen complement clinical chest pain units in establishing fast ambulatory triage pathways for patients with acute chest pain. This consensus paper describes the organisational structures and pathways for the establishment of Brustschmerz-Ambulanzen and their accreditation by the German Cardiac Society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Breuckmann F, Post F, Giannitsis E et al (2008) Kriterien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung für „Chest-Pain-Units“. Kardiologe 2(5):389–394
Ruigomez A, Rodriguez LA, Wallander MA et al (2006) Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality. Fam Pract 23:167–174
Ruigomez A, Masso-Gonzalez EL, Johansson S et al (2009) Chest pain without established ischaemic heart disease in primary care patients: associated comorbidities and mortality. Br J Gen Pract 59:e78–e86
Dietz R, Rauch B (2003) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic coronary heart disease. Issued by the executive committee of the German Society of Cardiology – Heart Circulation Research in cooperation with the German Society for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiac Diseases and the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Z Kardiol 92:501–521
Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ et al (2007) Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1109–1127
Mason JW, Hancock EW, Gettes LS (2007) Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part II: Electrocardiography diagnostic statement list. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1128–1135
Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, Gettes LS (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part III: Intraventricular conduction disturbances. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:976–981
Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part IV: The ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval. A Sscientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:982–991
Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirvis DM et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part V: Electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:992–1002
Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part VI: Acute ischemia/infarction. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1003–1011
Muller-Bardorff M, Rauscher T, Kampmann M et al (1999) Quantitative bedside assay for cardiac troponin T: a complementary method to centralized laboratory testing. Clin Chem 45:1002–1008
Douglas P, Khandheria B, Steinback R, Weissmann N (2007) ACCF/ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 Appropriateness criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:187–204
Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA et al (2008) ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices). Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:e1–e62
Trappe HJ, Lollgen H (2000) Guidelines for ergometry. German Society of Cardiology – Heart and Cardiovascular Research. Z Kardiol 89:821–831
Douglas PS, Khandheria B, Stainback RF et al (2008) ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 Appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:1127–1147
Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1475–1497
Bandoh T, Mitani H, Niihashi M et al (2000) Fluvastatin suppresses atherosclerotic progression, mediated through its inhibitory effect on endothelial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, and macrophage deposition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 35:136–144
Bassand J, Hamm C, Ardissino D et al (2007) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28:1598–1660
Scheike M, Nilsson S, Nylander E (2007) Exercise testing and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in primary care patients with chest pain of new onset. Scand J Prim Health Care 25:117–122
Hamm CW (2009) Kommentar zu den Leitlinien der European Society of Cardiology (ESC) zur Diagnose und Therapie des akuten Koronarsyndroms ohne ST-Strecken-Hebung (NSTE-ACS). Kardiologe 3:81–100
Siebens K, Moons P, De GS et al (2007) The role of nurses in a chest pain unit. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 6:265–272
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Additional information
___ ___
Die Autoren S. Perings und N. Smetak tragen gleichermaßen zu dieser Arbeit bei.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perings, S., Smetak, N., Block, M. et al. Konsensuspapier der Task Force „Brustschmerz-Ambulanz“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung. Kardiologe 4, 208–213 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-010-0266-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-010-0266-2
Schlüsselwörter
- Brustschmerz
- Brustschmerzambulanzen
- Chest-Pain-Units
- Task Force „Brustschmerz-Ambulanz“
- Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung