Purpose of Review
Expanded indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have raised awareness of associated complications, including periprosthetic fractures. The purpose of this article was to provide a comprehensive update on how, when, and why RSA-related periprosthetic fractures occur, as well as to describe the current treatment strategies.
Periprosthetic acromial and scapular spine fractures occur in up to 4.3% of cases and periprosthetic humeral fractures occur in approximately 3.5% of RSA procedures. Fractures of the coracoid process and clavicle have also been reported. Current literature has identified several risk factors for intraoperative or postoperative fracture, including underlying osteoporosis, revision arthroplasty, use of a superiorly placed screw during metaglene fixation, and disruption of the scapular ring by transection of the coracoacromial ligament.
Periprosthetic fracture associated with RSA is a clinically significant event that warrants prolonged postoperative vigilance, timely diagnosis, and shared patient decision-making regarding treatment. Further research is needed to identify optimal treatment strategies and characterize long-term clinical outcomes following RSA-related periprosthetic fracture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Garcia-Fernandez C, Lopiz-Morales Y, Rodriguez A, Lopez-Duran L, Martinez FM. Periprosthetic humeral fractures associated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: incidence and management. Int Orthop. Germany. 2015;39:1965–9.
Wajnsztejn A, Foni NO, Oizerovici D, Pires RES, Ejnisman B. Periprosthetic humeral fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Case report. Einstein (Sao Paulo). Brazil. 2018;16:eRC4037.
Saltzman BM, Leroux T, Collins MJ, Arns TA, Forsythe B. Short stem reverse total shoulder arthroplasty periprosthetic type a fracture. Orthopedics. United States. 2017;40:e721–4.
Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, Craig EV, Gulotta LV. National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2015;24:91–7.
Day JS, Paxton ES, Lau E, Gordon VA, Abboud JA, Williams GR. Use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2015;24:766–72.
Palsis JA, Simpson KN, Matthews JH, Traven S, Eichinger JK, Friedman RJ. Current trends in the use of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. Orthopedics. United States. 2018;41:e416–23.
Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. United States. 2011;93:2249–54.
•• Kennon JC, Lu C, McGee-Lawrence ME, Crosby LA. Scapula fracture incidence in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using screws above or below metaglene central cage: clinical and biomechanical outcomes. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2017;26:1023–30 This study demonstrated improved biomechanical strength was achieved in cadaveric scapulae when metaglene fixation was performed with screws placed inferior to the central axis of the glenoid, as compared with a screw configuration in which screws were placed above and below the central axis. In a retrospective review of 318 RSA cases, the study further established a correlation between inferior-only metaglene fixation and a reduced incidence of scapula fractures.
Farshad M, Gerber C. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop. Germany. 2010;34:1075–82.
Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2011;20:146–57.
Bohsali KI, Bois AJ, Wirth MA. Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. United States. 2017;99:256–69.
Rugg CM, Coughlan MJ, Lansdown DA. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanics and indications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. United States. 2019;12:542–53.
Mayne IP, Bell SN, Wright W, Coghlan JA. Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elb. United States. 2016;8:90–100.
•• Taylor SA, Shah S, Chen X, Gentile J, Gulotta LV, Dines JS, Dines DD, Cordasco FA, Warren RF, Kontaxis A. Scapular ring preservation: coracoacromial ligament transection increases scapular spine strains following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;(In press). Through biomechanical testing of RSA performed in 8 cadaveric shoulders, this study demonstrated that transection of the coracoacromial ligament during RSA increases the forces transmitted to the scapular spine. The findings suggest that preservation of the coracoacromial ligament may reduce the risk of periprosthetic scapular spine fracture.
King JJ, Dalton SS, Gulotta LV, Wright TW, Schoch BS. How common are acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. England. 2019;101-B:627–34.
Ascione F, Kilian CM, Laughlin MS, Bugelli G, Domos P, Neyton L, et al. Increased scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a humeral onlay short stem: an analysis of 485 consecutive cases. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2018;27:2183–90.
Liou W, Yang Y, Petersen-Fitts GR, Lombardo DJ, Stine S, Sabesan VJ. Effect of lateralized design on muscle and joint reaction forces for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2017;26:564–72.
•• Zmistowski B, Gutman M, Horvath Y, Abboud JA, Williams GRJ, Namdari S. Acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: incidence and predictors. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States; 2019; This retrospective analysis of 1,170 RSA cases performed at a single institution over a six-year period demonstrated a 4.2% incidence of acromial stress fractures and 6.4% incidence of acromial stress reactions. The study identified female sex, a reduced deltoid length, and increased glenohumeral center-of-rotation medialization as predictors of acromial stress pathology.
•• Neyton L, Erickson J, Ascione F, Bugelli G, Lunini E, Walch G. Grammont Award 2018: Scapular fractures in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (Grammont style): prevalence, functional, and radiographic results with minimum 5-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2019;28:260–7 This retrospective study reported clinical outcomes data on 1035 RSAs at a minimum five-year follow-up. They reported a periprosthetic scapular fracture incidence of 1.3% and demonstrated worse clinical outcomes in patients who sustained a scapular spine fracture in comparison with a control cohort of patients who underwent RSA.
Cho C-H, Jung J-W, Na S-S, Bae K-C, Lee K-J, Kim D-H. Is acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty a negligible complication?: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Surg. Korea (South). 2019;11:427–35.
• Patterson DC, Chi D, Parsons BO, Cagle PJJ. Acromial spine fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2019;28:792–801.
Teusink MJ, Otto RJ, Cottrell BJ, Frankle MA. What is the effect of postoperative scapular fracture on outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2014;23:782–90.
• Levy JC, Anderson C, Samson A. Classification of postoperative acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. United States. 2013;95:e104.
Combes D, Lancigu R, Desbordes de Cepoy P, Caporilli-Razza F, Hubert L, Rony L, et al. Imaging of shoulder arthroplasties and their complications: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. Germany. 2019;10:90.
Dekker TJ, Steele JR, Vinson EV, Garrigues GE. Current peri-operative imaging concepts surrounding shoulder arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. Germany. 2019;48:1485–97.
Hess F, Zettl R, Smolen D, Knoth C. Anatomical reconstruction to treat acromion fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop. Germany. 2018;42:875–81.
Casp AJ, Montgomery SRJ, Cancienne JM, Brockmeier SF, Werner BC. Osteoporosis and implant-related complications after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. United States. 2020;28:121–7.
Otto RJ, Virani NA, Levy JC, Nigro PT, Cuff DJ, Frankle MA. Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2013;22:1514–21.
Walch G, Mottier F, Wall B, Boileau P, Mole D, Favard L. Acromial insufficiency in reverse shoulder arthroplasties. J shoulder. Elb Surg. United States. 2009;18:495–502.
Werner BC, Gulotta LV, Dines JS, Dines DM, Warren RF, Craig EV, et al. Acromion compromise does not significantly affect clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a matched case-control study. HSS J. United States. 2019;15:147–52.
Smith CD, Guyver P, Bunker TD. Indications for reverse shoulder replacement: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. England. 2012;94:577–83.
Phadnis J, Huang T, Watts A, Krishnan J, Bain GI. Cemented or cementless humeral fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review. Bone Joint J. England. 2016;98-B:65–74.
Wong MT, Langohr GDG, Athwal GS, Johnson JA. Implant positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has an impact on acromial stresses. J shoulder. Elb Surg. United States. 2016;25:1889–95.
Giles JW, Langohr GDG, Johnson JA, Athwal GS. The rotator cuff muscles are antagonists after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2016;25:1592–600.
•• Eno J-JT, Kontaxis A, Novoa-Boldo A, Windsor E, Chen X, Erickson BJ, et al. The biomechanics of subscapularis repair in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: the effect of lateralization and insertion site. J Orthop Res. United States. 2020;38:888–94 In this biomechanical study, 9 shoulder models were used to compare native, inferior, and superior subscapularis repair sites during RSA on subscapularis tension. The study demonstrated that repairing the subscapularis tendon to a more superior location on the lesser tuberosity can prevent overtensioning of the subscapularis, thereby improving its function.
• Werner BC, Wong AC, Mahony GT, Craig EV, Dines DM, Warren RF, et al. Clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without subscapularis repair: the importance of considering glenosphere lateralization. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. United States. 2018;26:e114–9.
Daalder MA, Venne G, Sharma V, Rainbow M, Bryant T, Bicknell RT. Trabecular bone density distribution in the scapula relevant to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Open Access. Netherlands. 2018;2:174–81.
Merolla G, Walch G, Ascione F, Paladini P, Fabbri E, Padolino A, et al. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2018;27:701–10.
Crosby LA, Hamilton A, Twiss T. Scapula fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: classification and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. United States. 2011;469:2544–9.
Stevens CG, Murphy MR, Stevens TD, Bryant TL, Wright TW. Bilateral scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2015;24:e50–5.
•• Wagner ER, Houdek MT, Elhassan BT, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH, Sperling JW. What are risk factors for intraoperative humerus fractures during revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty and do they influence outcomes? Clin Orthop Relat Res. United States. 2015;473:3228–34 This study retrospectively analyzed 230 shoulders that underwent conversion from an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to a RSA. Eighty-one percent of identified humerus fractures occurred during component removal. The study identified female sex, a history of instability, and prior hemiarthroplasty as factors predisposing to intraoperative periprosthetic humerus fracture.
Atoun E, Van Tongel A, Hous N, Narvani A, Relwani J, Abraham R, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a short metaphyseal humeral stem. Int Orthop Germany. 2014;38:1213–8.
Athwal GS, Sperling JW, Rispoli DM, Cofield RH. Periprosthetic humeral fractures during shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. United States. 2009;91:594–603.
• Bacle G, Nove-Josserand L, Garaud P, Walch G. Long-term outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a follow-up of a previous study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. United States. 2017;99:454–61.
Petkovic D, Kovacevic D, Levine WN, Jobin CM. Management of the ffailed arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. United States. 2019;27:39–49.
Collins DN. CORR insights((R)): what are risk factors for intraoperative humerus fractures during revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty and do they influence outcomes? Clin Orthop Relat Res. United States. 2015;473:3635–7.
Van Thiel GS, Halloran JP, Twigg S, Romeo AA, Nicholson GP. The vertical humeral osteotomy for stem removal in revision shoulder arthroplasty: results and technique. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 2011;20:1248–54.
Schnetzke M, Coda S, Walch G, Loew M. Clinical and radiological results of a cementless short stem shoulder prosthesis at minimum follow-up of two years. Int Orthop. Germany. 2015;39:1351–7.
• Jost PW, Dines JS, Griffith MH, Angel M, Altchek DW, Dines DM. Total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing mini-stem humeral components: technique and short-term results. HSS J. United States. 2011;7:213–7.
Wright TW, Cofield RH. Humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. United States. 1995;77:1340–6.
Kumar S, Sperling JW, Haidukewych GH, Cofield RH. Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. United States. 2004;86:680–9.
• Campbell JT, Moore RS, Iannotti JP, Norris TR, Williams GR. Periprosthetic humeral fractures: mechanisms of fracture and treatment options. J Shoulder Elb Surg. United States. 1998;7:406–13.
Cameron B, Iannotti JP. Periprosthetic fractures of the humerus and scapula: management and prevention. Orthop Clin North Am. United States. 1999;30:305–18.
Mineo GV, Accetta R, Franceschini M, Pedrotti Dell’Acqua G, Calori GM, Meersseman A. Management of shoulder periprosthetic fractures: our institutional experience and review of the literature. Injury. Netherlands. 2013;44(Suppl 1):S82–5.
Anakwenze OA, Pifer MA, Singh A. Clavicle stress fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J shoulder. Elb Surg. United States. 2014;23:e170–2.
Kim YS, Wang S-I, Lee JH. Clavicle fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a case report with literature review. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. Turkey. 2016;50:111–4.
Mufty S, Milants P, Reynaert P, Mulier T. Clavicular stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a case report. JBJS Case Connect. United States. 2016;6:e18.
Anakwenze OA, Kancherla VK, Carolan GF, Abboud J. Coracoid fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a report of 2 cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). United States. 2015;44:E469–72.
Conflict of Interest
Christopher Brusalis declares that he has no conflict of interest. Samuel Taylor declares that he has the following potential conflict of interest: paid consultant for DJO Global.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
About this article
Cite this article
Brusalis, C.M., Taylor, S.A. Periprosthetic Fractures in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts and Advances in Management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 13, 509–519 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09654-8
- Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
- Humeral fracture
- Scapular fracture
- Coracoid process