A review of mallet finger and jersey finger injuries in the athlete
Purpose of review
The purposes of this review are to discuss the diagnosis and management of mallet and jersey finger injuries in athletes and to highlight how treatment impacts return to play.
Mallet finger: although numerous non-operative and operative techniques have been described, there continues to be little consensus regarding the optimal procedure. Jersey finger: ultrasound appears to be a cost-effective imaging modality that may be useful for preoperative planning. Wide-awake surgery offers optimal intraoperative assessment of the tendon repair. Tendon repair with volar plate augmentation has been shown to improve the strength of the repair in the laboratory, and early clinical results are encouraging.
Most mallet finger injuries will heal with non-operative treatment over a period of 8–12 weeks, even when treatment is delayed up to 3–4 months. An acute diagnosis of jersey finger requires surgical treatment and generally means 8–12 weeks of inability to compete in most contact sports.
KeywordsAthlete Distal phalanx Jersey finger Mallet finger Tendon avulsion
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights and informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 10.Seymour N. Juxta-epiphysial fracture of the terminal phalanx of the finger. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1966;48:347–9.Google Scholar
- 11.Doyle J. Extensor tendons-acute injuries. In: Green D, editor. Green’s operative hand surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993.Google Scholar
- 13.Burton RI. Extensor tendons—late reconstruction. In: Green DP, editor. Operative hand surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988.Google Scholar
- 15.• Altan E, Alp NB, Baser R, Yalçın L. Soft-tissue mallet injuries: a comparison of early and delayed treatment. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2014;39:1982–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.140. The authors note that conservative management of tendinous mallet finger injuries that have been neglected for 2 to 4 weeks are treated as effectively as those presenting within 2 weeks of injury, with low long-term complication rates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.• Toker S, Türkmen F, Pekince O, Korucu İ, Karalezli N. Extension block pinning versus hook plate fixation for treatment of mallet fractures. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2015;40:1591–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.027. In this level III retrospective study, the authors compare clinical outcomes between extension block pinning and open reduction and internal fixation with a hook plate. The study had a small sample size of 22 patients in total and noted no statistical differences in outcomes. The authors concluded that extension pinning was less expensive than hook plate fixation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.•• Lalonde DH, Martin AL. Wide-awake flexor tendon repair and early tendon mobilization in zones 1 and 2. Hand Clin. 2013;29:207–13. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.009. A thorough discussion of wide-awake flexor tendon repair is presented, including technical considerations related to the use of local anesthesia and intraoperative assessment of the tendon repair.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Bunnell S. Surgery of the hand. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1948.Google Scholar
- 32.• Al-Qattan MM. Use of the volar plate of the distal interphalangeal joint as a distally based flap in flexor tendon surgery. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2016;41:287–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.004. This manuscript discusses the distal interphalangeal joint volar plate as a distally based flap for zone I tendon repair. Its advantages and potential complications are also discussed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Chu JY, Chen T, Awad HA, Elfar J, Hammert WC. Comparison of an all-inside suture technique with traditional pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques for flexor digitorum profundus attachment to bone. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2013;38:1084–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.• Brar R, Owen JR, Melikian R, Gaston RG, Wayne JS, Isaacs JE. Reattachment of flexor digitorum profundus avulsion: biomechanical performance of 3 techniques. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2014;39:2214–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.054. In this cadaveric study of FDP suture anchor repair, volar plate incorporation conferred a significant advantage in strength relative to suture anchor fixation alone.CrossRefGoogle Scholar