Determination of Antimicrobial Residues in Honey by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
- 5 Downloads
Antibiotics are generally used worldwide against bacterial diseases in the treatment of food-producing animals. Since the residues of active agents or their metabolites can appear in these foods, the European Union, for instance, has set maximum residue limit concentrations for authorised veterinary drugs in foodstuffs. However, as yet, regulatory limits have not been established for honey and thus far, only recommendations exist. The aim of this study is to present a multiscreening method for residues in honey for the determination of 36 antimicrobial residues associated with several antibiotics of the B1 group (sulfonamides, trimethoprim, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, quinolones and lincomycin) as well as the antibiotic griseofulvin. During the screening analysis, samples are hydrolysed in an acidified medium, purified on polymeric solid-phase extraction cartridges and subsequently analysed by reversed phase ion pair liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The liquid chromatographic separation was optimised by computer simulation with DryLab software. The positive identification of target compounds in suspicious samples was confirmed using earlier developed antibiotic class specific methods of which the aminoglycoside method is herein described in detail. The developed approaches were then applied to samples in the national monitoring program after their successful validation. Moreover, the screening and confirmatory methods were applied to proficiency test samples resulting in satisfactory identification and quantification. However, the analysis of real samples revealed that co-eluting target compounds can have considerable influence on the accuracy of this semi-quantitative multiscreening method.
KeywordsAntimicrobial residues Honey Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry Screening Confirmation Proficiency test
We wish to acknowledge the assist of Éva Pálffi, Tímea Kremniczky and Viktória Lipcsei in the sample preparations. Authors would like to thank Szabolcs Fekete for improving the paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Consent for Publication
Publication has been approved by all individual participants.
- Bargańska Ż, Namieśnik J, Ślebioda M (2011) Determination of antibiotic residues in honey. TrAC-Trend Anal Chem 30:1035–1041Google Scholar
- CRL Guidance Paper (2007) CRLs view on state of the art analytical methods for the national residue control plans. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaaldepot/crlguidance2007.pdf
- CRL (2010) Guidelines for the validation of screening methods for residues of veterinary medicines (Initial validation and transfer). Community Reference Laboratories 20/1/2010. http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/residues/Guideline Validation Screening en.pdf Accessed 10 June 2017
- Commission Decision of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results 2002/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results (2002/657/EC) (2002) Off J Eur Commun L221Google Scholar
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin (2010) Off J EU Legis L 15/1Google Scholar
- Fekete S, Fekete J, Molnár I, Ganzler K (2009) Rapid high performance liquid chromatography method development with high prediction accuracy, using 5cm long narrow bore columns packed with sub-2μm particles and Design Space computer modeling. J Chromatogr A 1216(45):7816–78EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.09.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fyfe L, Okoro P, Paterson E, Coyle S, McDougall GJ (2017) Compositional analysis of Scottish honeys with antimicrobial activity against antibiotic-resistant bacteria reveals novel antimicrobial components. Food Sci Technol 79:52–59Google Scholar
- Gaugain-Juhel M, Delépine B, Gautier S, Fourmond MP, Gaudin V, Hurtaud-Pessel D, Verdon E, Sanders P (2009) Validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry screening method to monitor 58 antibiotics in milk: a qualitative approach. Food Addit Contam 26(11):1459–1471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030903150575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hawari KE, Mokh S, Doumyati S, Iskandarani MA, Verdon E (2017) Development and validation of a multiclass method for the determination of antibiotic residues in honey using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam Part A 34(4):582–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2016.1EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results 20022491
- JECFA (2013) Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee On Food Additives. Seventy-eighth meeting (Residues of veterinary drugs); 2013 Nov 5–14; Geneva. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agns/pdf/jecfa/JECFA_78_Summary_report_Version_final.pdf
- Kivrak I, Kivrak S, Harmandar M (2016) Development of a rapid method for the determination of antibiotic residues in honey using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.. Food Sci Technol (Campinas) vol. 36 online version Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.0037
- Lafontaine C, Shi Y, Espourteille FA (2009) Multi-class antibiotic screening of honey using Online Extraction with LC-MS/MS. Thermo Scientific application note: 464. Available from: https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/brochures/AN464-multi-class-antibiotic-screening-of-honey-using-online-extraction-with-lc-msms.pdf
- Lopez MI, Pettis JS, Barton Smith I, Chu P-S (2008) Multiclass determination and confirmation of antibiotic residues in honey using LC-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem 56(5):1553–1559. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf073EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results 20026w
- Louppis AP, Kontominas MG, Papastephanou C (2017) Determination of antibiotic residues in honey by high-performance liquid chromatography with electronspray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Food Anal Methods In press 10(10):3385–3397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-017-0899-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Núñez O, Moyano E, Galceran MT (2005) LC–MS/MS analysis of organic toxics in food. TrAC 24:683–703Google Scholar
- Orso D, Floriano L, Ribeiro LC, Bandeira NMG, Prestes OD, Zanella R (2016) Simultaneous determination of multiclass pesticides and antibiotics in honey samples based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Anal Methods 9(6):1638–1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0339-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spaggiari D, Mehl F, Desfontaine V, Perrenoud AGG, Fekete S, Rudaz S, Guillarme D (2014) Comparison of liquid chromatography and supercritical fluid chromatography coupled to compact single quadrupole mass spectrometer for targeted in vitro metabolism assay. J Chromatogr A 1371:244–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.10.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tölgyesi Á, Berky R, Békési K, Fekete S, Fekete J, Sharma VK (2013) Quantitative analysis of sulfonamide residues in real honey using high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence and tandem mass spectrometric detection. J Liq Chromatogr Rel Tech 36:1105–1125Google Scholar
- Tölgyesi Á, Tölgyesi L, Békési K, Sharma VK, Fekete J (2014) Determination of tetracyclines in pig and other meat samples using liquid chromatography coupled with diode array and tandem mass spectrometric detectors. Meat Sci 96(3):1332–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhu WX, Yang JZ, Wei W, Liu YF, Zhang SS (2008) Simultaneous determination of 13 aminoglycoside residues in foods of animal origin by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry with two consecutive solid-phase extraction steps. J Chromatogr A 1207(1–2):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.08.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar