Optimization of an Analytical Method for Determination of Pyrene in Smoked Meat Products
- 172 Downloads
In the present study, an analytical method was optimized for determination of pyrene by solid-phase extraction in Turkish foodstuffs including chicken and grilled meat samples. In accordance with this purpose, all of the parameters that may affect the signal of pyrene during analysis processes were optimized using high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry system. The optimized parameters for column temperature, injection volume, mobile-phase flow rate, and fragmentor potential were found to be 45 °C, 60 μL, 0.6 mL min−1, and 130 V, respectively. The optimized high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method was applied for the determination and evaluation of pyrene in food samples that include chicken and grilled meat. The pyrene amount in meat samples was obtained in the range from 2.3 to 4.4 μg kg−1 for the normal grilled meat and chicken samples and from 12 to 135 μg kg−1 for exceedingly grilled samples. The results show that the concentration of pyrene is significantly dependent on the type of meat sample and cooking source. The limit of detection and quantitation was found to be 0.5 μg L−1 and 1.53 μg L−1, respectively.
KeywordsPyrene Solid-phase extraction High-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry Food Grilled meat Chicken
This research was a part of the Firat University Research Fund with grant no. 1533.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Muharrem Ince declares that he has no conflict of interest. Olcay Kaplan Ince declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mehmet Yaman declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Muharrem Ince declares that he has not received any honoraries from any commercial companies.
Olcay Kaplan Ince declares that she has not received any honoraries from any commercial companies.
Mehmet Yaman declares that he has not received any honoraries from any commercial companies.
Muharrem Ince declares that this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal subjects.
Olcay Kaplan Ince declares that this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal subjects.
Mehmet Yaman declares that this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal subjects.
- (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. Agriculture and Consumer Protection Department (2013) Meat & meat products [Internet]; [cited 2013 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/en/meat/home.html
- Commission Regulation (EU) No. 1881/2006 of 19 December (2006) Setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffsGoogle Scholar
- European Commission. Commision Regulation No. 208/2005 of 4 February (2005) Amending regulation (EC) no 466/2001 as regards polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Off J Eur Union L34:3–5Google Scholar
- Ince M, Yaman M (2012) High performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for determination of benzo[a]pyrene in grilled meat foods. Asian J Chem 24:3391–3395Google Scholar
- (IARC) International Agency for Research on Cancer (1983) Polynuclear aromatic compounds, Part 1, chemical, environmental and experimental data. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum 32:1–453. PMID:6586639Google Scholar
- Janoszka B, Warzecha L, Blaszczyk U, Bodzek D (2004) Organic compounds formed in thermally treated high-protein food. Part I: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Acta Chromatogr 14:115–128Google Scholar
- Moret S, Conte LS (2000) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in edible fats and oils: occurrence and analytical methods. J Chromatogr A 882:245–248Google Scholar
- Perelló G, Martí-Cid R, Castell V, Llobet JM, Domingo JL (2009) Concentrations of polybrominated diphenyl ethers, hexachlorobenzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in various foodstuffs before and after cooking. Food Chem Toxicol 47(4):709–15Google Scholar
- Perera F, Tang DL, Whyatt R, Lederman SA, Jedrychowski W (2005) DNA damage from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons measured by benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts in mothers and newborns from northern Manhattan, the world trade center area, Poland, and China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 14:709–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reinik M, Tamme T, Roasto M, Juhkam K, Tenno T, Kiis A (2007) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in meat products and estimated PAH intake by children and the general population in Estonia. Food Addit Contam 24(4):429–37Google Scholar
- Suranová M, Semanová J, Skláršová B, Simko P (2015) Application of accelerated solvent extraction for simultaneous isolation and pre-cleaning up procedure during determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in smoked meat products. Food Anal Methods 8:1014–1020. doi: 10.1007/s12161-014-9977-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (USEPA) United States Environmental Protection Agency (1984) Review and evaluation of the evidence for cancer associated with air pollution. EPA-540/5-83-006R. US Environmental Protection Agency, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
- Veyrand B, Brosseaud A, Sarcher L, Varlet V, Monteau F, Marchand P, Andre F, Le Bizec B (2007) Innovative method for determination of 19 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food and oil samples using gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry based on an isotope dilution approach. J Chromatogr A 1149:333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar