Abstract
A multiresidue method for the analysis of over 140 multiclass pesticides in fruiting vegetables, based on quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation procedure followed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS), was established. In the validation study, the overall recoveries from spiked samples were 102 ± 7, 95 ± 7, and 95 ± 7 % with RSD values of 7 ± 3, 7 ± 4, and 7 ± 3 % at the spiking levels of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.5 mg kg−1, respectively, demonstrating fitness for purpose of the method. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.01 mg kg−1 for more than 90 % of the target compounds. The analysis of over 300 samples of tomatoes, sweet peppers, and cucumbers was carried out in 2006–2014. Of these samples, 52 % contained pesticide residues but the results of the assessment of dietary exposure supported the conclusion that the presence of pesticide residues was unlikely to have a negative effect on the health of consumers. Although some of the pesticides detected in years 2006–2009 are no longer approved in the European Union member countries (namely endosulfan, oxadixyl, procymidone, propargite, and tolylfluanid), the consumer dietary exposure was low and did not exceed 12 % of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) considering both adults’ and children’s diet. Regarding short-term exposure (acute), in only one case of procymidone in sweet pepper, the acute reference dose (ARfD) for children was exceeded by 139.6 % of the ARfD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambrus Á (2015) International harmonization of food safety assessment of pesticide residues. J Agric Food Chem. doi:10.1021/jf505854w
Anasassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int 86:412–431
Botitsi HV, Garbis SD, Economou A, Tsipi DF (2011) Current mass spectrometry strategies for the analysis of pesticides and their metabolites in food and water matrices. Mass Spectrom Rev 30:907–939. doi:10.1002/mas.20307
Bruzzoniti MC, Checchini L, De Carlo RM, Orlandini S, Rivoira L, Del Bubba M (2014) QuEChERS sample preparation for the determination of pesticides and other organic residues in environmental matrices: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:4089–4116. doi:10.1007/s00216-014-7798-4
Drogué S, DeMaria F (2012) Pesiticide residues and trade, the apple of discord? Food Policy 37:641–649. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.06.007
Fenik J, Tankiewicz M, Biziuk M (2011) Properties and determination of pesticides in fruits and vegetables. Trends Anal Chem 30:814–826. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2011.02.008
González-Curbelo MÁ, Herrera-Herrera AV, Ravelo-Pérez LM, Hernández-Borges J (2012) Sample preparation methods for pesticide residue analysis in cereals and derivatives. Trends Anal Chem 38:32–51. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2012.04.010
González-Curbelo MÁ, Socas-Rodríguez B, Herrera-Herrera AV, González-Sálamo J, Hernández-Borges J, Rodríguez-Delgado MÁ (2015) Evolution and applications of the QuEChERS method. Trends Anal Chem. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2015.04.012
Handford CE, Elliott CT, Campbell K (2015) A review of the global pesticide legislation and the scale of challenge in reaching the global harmonization of food safety standards. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9999:1–12. doi:10.1002/ieam.1635
Hernández F, Cervera MI, Portolés T, Beltrán J, Pitarch E (2013) The role of GC-MS/MS with triple quadrupole in pesticide residue analysis in food and the environment. Anal Methods 5:5875–5894. doi:10.1039/C3AY41104D
Lehotay SJ (2011) QuEChERS sample preparation approach for mass spectrometric analysis of pesticide residues in food. Methods Mol Biol 747:65–91. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-136-9_4
Lehotay SJ, Maštovská K, Lightfield AR (2005) Use of buffering and other means to improve results of problematic pesticides in a fast and easy method for residue analysis of fruits and vegetables. J AOAC Int 88:615–629
Lehotay SJ, Son KA, Kwon H, Koesukwiwat U, Fu W, Mastovska K, Hoh E, Leepipatpiboon N (2010) Comparison of QuEChERS sample pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. J Chromatogr A 1217:2548–2560. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.044
MacLachlan DJ, Hamilton D (2010) Estimation methods for maximum residue limits for pesticides. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58:208–218. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.05.012
Maštovská K, Lehotay SJ (2004) Evaluation of common solvents for gas chromatographic analysis and stability of multiclass pesticide residues. J Chromatogr A 1040:259–272. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2004.04.017
Matyjaszczyk E (2015) Prevention methods for pest control and their use in Poland. Pest Manag Sci 71:485–491. doi:10.1002/ps.3795
Nougadère A, Merlo M, Héraud F, Réty J, Truchot E, Vial G, Cravedi J-P, Leblanc J-C (2014) How dietary risk assessment can guide risk management and food monitoring programmes: the approach and results of the French observatory on pesticide residues (ANSES/ORP). Food Control 41:32–48. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.025
Payá P, Anastassiades M, Mack D, Sigalova I, Tasdelen B, Oliva J, Barba A (2007) Analysis of pesticide residues using the quick easy cheap effective rugged and safe (QuEChERS) pesticide multiresidue method in combination with gas and liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometric detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:697–1714. doi:10.1007/s00216-007-1610-7
Popp J, Pető K, Nagy J (2013) Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:243–255. doi:10.1007/s13593-012-0105-x
Renwick AG (2002) Pesticide residue analysis and its relationship to hazard characterization (ADI/ARfD) and intake estimations (NEDI/NESTI). Pest Manag Sci 58:1073–1082. doi:10.1002/ps.544
Solecki R, Davies L, Dellarco V, Dewhurst I, van Raaij M, Trischer A (2005) Guidance on setting of acute reference dose (ARfD) for pesticides. Food Chem Toxicol 43:1569–1593. doi:10.1015/j.fct.2005.04.005
Szpyrka E, Kurdziel A, Słowik-Borowiec M, Grzegorza M, Matyaszek A (2013) Consumer exposure to pesticide residues in apples from the region of south-eastern Poland. Environ Monit Assess 185:8873–8878. doi:10.1007/s10661-013-3219-y
Walorczyk S (2012) Gas chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric analysis of pesticides residues in produce using concurrent solvent recondensation-large volume injection. J Chromatogr A 1222:98–108. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2011.12.012
Walorczyk S (2014) Validation and use of a QuEChERS-based gas chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method for multiresidue pesticide analysis in blackcurrants including studies of matrix effects and estimation of measurement uncertainty. Talanta 120:106–113. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2013.11.087
Walorczyk S, Drożdżyński D (2012) Improvement and extension to new analytes of a multi-residue method for the determination of pesticides in cereals and dry animal feed using gas chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry revisited. J Chromatogr A 1251:219–231. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2012.06.055
Acknowledgments
Skillful assistance of laboratory technical staff is greatly appreciated.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
ᅟ
Funding
This work was supported in part by Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego (Ministry of Science and Higher Education), project IDs POZ-03 and POZ-07.
Conflict of Interest
Stanisław Walorczyk declares that he has no conflict of interest. Izabela Kopeć declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ewa Szpyrka declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walorczyk, S., Kopeć, I. & Szpyrka, E. Pesticide Residue Determination by Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry as Applied to Food Safety Assessment on the Example of Some Fruiting Vegetables. Food Anal. Methods 9, 1155–1172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0292-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0292-6