Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Survey of Bioenergy Research in Forest Service Research and Development

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest biomass represents 25–30 % of the annual biomass available in the USA for conversion into bio-based fuels, bio-based chemicals, and bioproducts in general. The USDA Forest Service Research and Development (R&D) has been focused on producing products from forest biomass since its inception in 1905, with direct combustion, solid sawn lumber, pulp and paper, ethanol as fuel, and silvichemicals all among the mission areas of product research and development. The renewed national interest in biomass conversion to fuels and chemicals is supportive of the most critical need of USDA Forest Service R&D, uses for small-diameter trees and other forest biomass that needs to be removed in the fuel mitigation–fire suppression and forest restoration work of the USDA Forest Service. This paper will summarize the recent USDA Forest Service research on direct combustion, fuel pellets, and conversion of forest biomass to ethanol, both as stand-alone biorefinery processes and as an addition to the traditional wood pulping process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DE-FG36-06GO16108, M001, Value prior to pulping, final report. October 8, 2010

  2. Houtman C, Horn E (2011) Pilot trials of hemicelluloses extraction prior to thermomechanical pulp production. Part 1. TAPPI J 10(5):21–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Atack D, Heitner C, Karnis A (1978) Ultra-high yield pulping of eastern black spruce. Part 2. Sven Pap 81(5):164–141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bilek EM, Houtman C, Ince P (2011) Evaluation of a value prior to pulping-thermomechanical pulp business concept. Part 2. TAPPI J 10(5):31–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris EE, Kline AA (1949) Hydrolysis of wood cellulose with hydrochloric acid and sulfur dioxide and the decomposition of its hydrolytic products. J Phys Chem 53(3):344–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wayman M, Tallevi A, Winsborrow B (1984) Hydrolysis of biomass by sulfur dioxide. Biomass 6:183–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mamers H, Menz DN (1984) Explosion pretreatment of Pinus radiate woodchips for the production of fermentation substrates. Appita 37(8):644–649

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boussaid AL, Esteghlalian AR, Gregg DJ, Lee LH, Saddler JN (2000) Steam pretreatment of Douglas-fir wood chips. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:693–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu JY, Zhu W, O’Bryan P, Dien BS, Tian S, Gleisner R, Pan XJ (2010) Ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine: preliminary evaluation of mass balance and process energy efficiency. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:1355–1365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng J, Leu SY, Zhu JY, Gleisner R (2015) High titer and yield of ethanol production from undetoxified whole slurry Douglas fir forest residue using pH profiling in SPORL. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou H, Lan T, Dien BS, Hector RE, Zhu JY (2014) Comparison of five Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine. Biotechnol Prog 30(5):1076–1083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou H, Zhu JY, Luo X, Leu S-Y, Wu X, Gleisner R, Dien BS, Hector RE, Yang D, Qiu X, Horn E, Negron J (2013) Bioconversion of beetle-killed lodgepole pine using SPORL: process scale-up design, lignin coproduct, and high solids fermentation without detoxification. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:16057–16065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou H, Lou H, Yang D, Zhu JY, Qiu X (2013) Lignosulfonate to enhance enzyme saccharification of lignocelluloses: role of molecular weight and substrate lignin. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:8464–8470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu JY, Chandra MS, Gu F, Gleisner R, Reiner R, Sessions J, Marrs G, Gao J, Anderson D (2015) Using sulfite chemistry for robust conversion of Douglas-fir forest residue to bioethanol at high titer and lignosulfonate: a pilot-scale evaluation. Bioresour Technol 179:390–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lamers P, Jacobson J Mohammad R Wright C (2014) Expected international demand for woody and herbaceous feedstock. Idaho National Laboratories Report No. EXT-14-33968. 35 p

  16. Elder T, Groom LH (2011) Pilot-scale gasification of woody biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3522–3528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dogru M, Howarth C, Akay RG, Keskinler B, Malik AA (2002) Gasification of hazelnut shells in a downdraft gasifier. Energy 27(5):415–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zainal ZA, Rifau A, Quadir GA, Seetharamu KN (2002) Experimental investigation of a downdraft biomass gasifier. Biomass Bioenergy 23(4):283–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tinaut FV, Melgar A, Pérez JF, Horrillo A (2008) Effect of biomass particle size and air superficial velocity on the gasification process in a downdraft fixed bed gasifier. An experimental and modelling study. Fuel Process Technol 89(11):1076–1089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gai C, Dong Y (2012) Experimental study on non-woody biomass gasification in a downdraft gasifier. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(6):4935–4944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanaoka T, Inoue S, Uno S, Ogi T, Minow T (2005) Effect of woody biomass components on air-steam gasification. Biomass Bioenergy 28(1):69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Elder T, Groom LH, Labbé N, Bhattacharya P (2013) Gasification of southern forest resources. Proceedings from Sun Grant National Conference: Science for Biomass Feedstock Production and Utilization, New Orleans

  23. Eberhardt TL, Pan H, Groom LH, So CL (2011) Characterization and partitioning of the char ash collected after the processing of pine wood chips in a pilot-scale gasification unit. In: Shelly JR, Ed. Woody biomass utilization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Woody Biomass Utilization, Forest Products Society, Starkville, MS (August 4–5, 2009); pp. 33–38

  24. Eberhardt TL, Pan H (2012) Elemental analyses of chars isolated from a biomass gasifier fly ash. Fuel 98:600–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eberhardt TL, Pan H (2013) Analysis of the fly ash from the processing of wood chips in a pilot-scale downdraft gasifier: comparison of inorganic constituents determined by PIXE and ICP-AES. Biomass Bioenergy 51:163–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson MA, Eberhardt TL, Boateng AA, Mullen CA, Groom LH (2013) Evaluation of biochars by temperature programmed oxidation/mass spectrometry. BioResources 8(4):5461–5474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pan H, Eberhardt TL (2011) Characterization of fly ash from the gasification of wood and assessment for its application as a soil amendment. Bioresources.com 6;4:3987-4004

  28. Jeong CY, Wang JJ, Dodla SK, Eberhardt TL, Groom L (2012) Effect of biochar amendment on tylosin adsorption-desorption and transport in two different soils. J Environ Qual 41:1185–1192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma P, Elder T, Groom L, Spivey JJ (2014) Effect of structural promoters on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of biomass derived syngas. Top Catal 57:526–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mai K, Elder T, Groom LH, Spivey JJ (2015) Fe-based Fischer Tropsch synthesis of biomass-derived syngas: effect of synthesis method. Catal Commun 65:76–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Anderson N, Jones JG, Page-Dumroese D, McCollum D, Baker S, Loeffler D, Chung W (2013) A comparison of producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon from two distributed scale thermochemical conversion systems used to process forest biomass. Energies 6:164–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brar JS, Singh K, Zondlo J (2013). Technical challenges and opportunities in cogasification of coal and biomass. In: Miller, Gary W.; Schuler, Thomas M.; Gottschalk, Kurt W.; Brooks, John R.; Grushecky, Shawn T, Spong BD, Rentch JS, eds. Proceedings, 18th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 2012 March 26-28; Morgantown, WV; Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-117. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 5-13

  33. Aguilar FX, Goerndt ME, Song N, Shifley S (2012) Internal, external and location factors influencing cofiring of biomass with coal in the U.S. northern region. Energy Econ 34:1790–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Goerndt ME, Aguilar FX, Skog KE (2015) Potential for coal power plants to co-fire with woody biomass in the U.S. North, 2010-2030: a technical document supporting the Northern Forest Futures Project. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, General Technical Report, FPL-GTR-237, 2015; 24 p

  35. Goerndt ME, Aguilar FX, Skog K (2013) Drivers of biomass co-firing in U.S. coal-fired power plants. Biomass Bioenergy 58:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Goerndt ME, Aguilar FX, Miles P, Shifley S, Song N, Stelzer H (2012) Regional assessment of woody biomass- physical availability as an energy feedstock for combined combustion in the US northern region. J For 2012:138–148

    Google Scholar 

  37. Goerndt ME, Aguilar FX, Skog K (2013) Resource potential for renewable energy generation from co-firing of woody biomass with coal in the Northern U.S. Biomass Bioenergy 59(2013):348–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Loeffler D, Anderson N (2014) Emissions tradeoffs associated with cofiring forest biomass with coal: a case study in Colorado, USA. Appl Energy 113:67–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitchell D, Rummer R (2007) Processing woody debris biomass for co-milling with pulverized coal. In: ASABE 2007 Annual International Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 17–20 June 2007. 6 p.

  40. Nicholls DL, Patterson SE, Uloth E (2006) Wood and coal cofiring in interior Alaska: utilizing woody biomass from wildland defensible-space fire treatments and other sources. Res. Note PNW-RN-551. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 15 p

  41. Nicholls D, Zerbe J (2012) Cofiring biomass and coal for fossil fuel reduction and other benefits—status of North American facilities in 2010. PNW-GTR-867. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 22 p

  42. Mitchell D, Elder T (2010) Torrefaction? What’s that? In: Proceedings of 2010 COFE: 33rd Annual Meeting of the Council on Forest Engineering. Auburn, AL: June 6–9, 2010. [CD-ROM] 1–7

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan W. Rudie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rudie, A.W., Houtman, C.J., Groom, L.H. et al. A Survey of Bioenergy Research in Forest Service Research and Development. Bioenerg. Res. 9, 534–547 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9731-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9731-5

Keywords

Navigation