The examination of conformity to social gender norms provides one approach that researchers may adopt to explore gendered selves and the influence of the gendered self in a range of contexts. Two measures that are often used to describe conformity to feminine and masculine social gender norms are the Conformity to Feminine Norms-45 and Conformity to Masculine Norms-46. However, the recommended structure of these instruments is inconsistent amongst the literature. Using Rasch modelling, the current study examines the psychometric properties of these instruments based on responses of both female and male Australian undergraduate university students. A total of 602 participants completed both instruments and the responses analysed to ensure the utility of each instrument to measure conformity to gender norms in the Australian context. An analysis of the transformed responses showed that both females and males show variability in their conformity to both feminine and masculine gender norms. However, differential item functioning showed that females and males differed in their understanding of items from the male and female forms of the inventory, respectively. The results are discussed in terms of the usefulness of each instrument to explain choices and action.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: Cluster Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983648
American Psychological Association. (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
Andrich, D. (1999). Rating scale analysis. In G. N. Masters & J. P. Keeves (Eds.), Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment (pp. 85–97). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.
Beutel, A. M., Burge, S. W., & Borden, B. A. (2018). Femininity and choice of college major. Gender Issues, 35(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-017-9195-8.
Beutel, A. M., Burge, S. W., & Borden, B. A. (2019). Masculinity and men’s choice of college major. Gender Issues. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-019-09236-0.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
Cano, A. G., Martínez, C. M., Bleda, C. P., & Parent, M. C. (2017). Adaptación al español del Inventario de Conformidad con las Normas de Género Femeninas-45. Uaricha, 14(32), 1–10.
Chambers, S. K., Hyde, M. K., Oliffe, J. L., Zajdlewicz, L., Lowe, A., Wootten, A. C., et al. (2016). Measuring masculinity in the context of chronic disease. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000018.
Chatfield, C., & Collins, A. J. (1980). Introduction to multivariate analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Clatworthy, J., Buick, D., Hankins, M., Weinman, J., & Horne, R. (2005). The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10(3), 329–358.
De Beauvoir, S. (1997). The second sex. London: Vintage.
De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in social research (5th ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
DiDonato, L., & Strough, J. (2013). Do college students’ gender-typed attitudes about occupations predict their real-world decisions? Sex Roles, 68(9–10), 536–549.
Eccles, J. S. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles' et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398185.
Epstein, C. F. (1997). The multiple realities of sameness and difference: Ideology and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 53(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02443.x.
Fox, J., & Tang, W. Y. (2014). Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.014.
Franko, D. L., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Rodgers, R. F., Holmqvist Gattario, K., Frisén, A., Diedrichs, P. C., Shingleton, R. M. (2015). Internalization as a mediator of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and body image attitudes and behaviors among young men in Sweden, US, UK, and Australia. Body Image, 15, 54–60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.05.002
Gattario, K. H., Frisén, A., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Ricciardelli, L. A., Diedrichs, P. C., Yager, Z., et al. (2015). How is men’s conformity to masculine norms related to their body image? Masculinity and muscularity across Western countries. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16(3), 337–347https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038494
Griffiths, S., Murray, S. B., & Touyz, S. (2015). Extending the masculinity hypothesis: An investigation of gender role conformity, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating in young heterosexual men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16(1), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035958.
Hammer, J. H., Heath, P. J., & Vogel, D. L. (2018). Fate of the total score: Dimensionality of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory-46 (CMNI-46). Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(4), 645–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000147.
Hayley, A., Cox, E., Zinkiewicz, L., Graham, K., Wells, S., Zhou, J., et al. (2017). Barroom aggression perpetration by Australian women: Associations with heavy episodic drinking, trait aggression, and conformity to gender norms. Journal of Substance Use. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2016.1271040.
Hsu, K., & Iwamoto, D. K. (2014). Testing for measurement invariance in the conformity to masculine norms-46 across white and Asian American college men: Development and validity of the CMNI-29. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(4), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034548.
Iwamoto, D. K., Cheng, A., Lee, C. S., Takamatsu, S., & Gordon, D. (2011). “Man-ing” up and getting drunk: The role of masculine norms, alcohol intoxication and alcohol-related problems among college men. Addictive Behaviors, 36(9), 906–911.
Kaya, A., Iwamoto, D. K., Grivel, M., Clinton, L., & Brady, J. (2016). The role of feminine and masculine norms in college women's alcohol use. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(2), 206–214.
Kling, J., Holmqvist Gattario, K., & Frisén, A. (2017). Swedish women's perceptions of and conformity to feminine norms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(3), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12361.
Levant, R. F., Hall, R. J., Weigold, I. K., & McCurdy, E. R. (2015). Construct distinctiveness and variance composition of multi-dimensional instruments: Three short-form masculinity measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(3), 488.
Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103–122.
Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.
Linacre, J. M. (2017). Winsteps®Rasch measurement computer program User's Guide. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.
Linacre, J. M. (2017). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.
Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
Lyócsa, I., Bašistová, A., & Lyócsa, S. (2013). Conformity to feminine norms and religiousness: A study of helping professionals in Slovakia. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(4), 1172–1189. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct191.
Lyócsa, I., & Lyócsa, S. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis of the abbreviated Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory. Social Work Research, 37(4), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svt034.
Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P., Gottfried, M., et al. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9126.96.36.199.
Mahalik, J. R., Morray, E. B., Coonerty-Femiano, A., Ludlow, L. H., Slattery, S. M., & Smiler, A. (2005). Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles, 52(7–8), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3709.
Miller, P., Wells, S., Hobbs, R., Zinkiewicz, L., Curtis, A., & Graham, K. (2014). Alcohol, masculinity, honour and male barroom aggression in an Australian sample. Drug and Alcohol Review, 33(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12114.
Miller, P., Zinkiewicz, L., Hayley, A., Sonderlund, A., Litherland, S., Medew-Ewen, T., …, Graham, K. (2016). Barroom aggression among Australian men: Associations with heavy episodic drinking, conformity to masculine norms, and personal and perceived peer approval of barroom aggression. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 77(3), 421-430https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2016.77.421
Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the conformity to masculine norms inventory and development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory-46. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10(3), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015481.
Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of the conformity to feminine norms inventory and the development of an abbreviated version: The CFNI-45. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01545.x.
Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2011). An abbreviated tool for assessing conformity to masculine norms: Psychometric properties of the conformity to masculine norms inventory-46. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12(4), 339.
Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2011). An abbreviated tool for assessing feminine norm conformity: Psychometric properties of the conformity to feminine norms inventory-45. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 958–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024082.
Parent, M. C., Moradi, B., Rummell, C. M., & Tokar, D. M. (2011). Evidence of construct distinctiveness for conformity to masculine norms. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12, 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023837.
Parent, M. C., Kalenkoski, C. M., & Cardella, E. (2018). Risky business: Precarious manhood and investment portfolio decisions. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(2), 195.
Parent, M. C., & Smiler, A. P. (2013). Metric invariance of the conformity to masculine norms inventory-46 among women and men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(3), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027642.
Pulerwitz, J., Blum, R., Cislaghi, B., Costenbader, E., Harper, C., Heise, L., …, Lundgren, R. (2019). Proposing a conceptual framework to address social norms that influence adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(4), S7–S9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.014
Risman, B. J. (2018). Where the millennials will take us: A new generation wrestles with the gender structure. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Rochelle, T. L., & Yim, K. H. (2015). Assessing the factor structure of the Chinese conformity to masculine norms inventory. The Journal of Psychology, 149(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2013.837023.
Smiler, A. P., & Epstein, M. (2010). Measuring gender: Options and issues. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 133–157). New York: Springer.
Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Psychology and gender (Vol. 32, pp. 59–96). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076857.
Thompson, E. H., & Bennett, K. (2015). Measurement of masculinity ideologies: A (critical) review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038609.
Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29(5), 531–543.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
Whitehead, J. M. (1996). Sex stereotypes, gender identity and subject choice at A-level. Educational Research, 38(2), 147–160.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee, Project ID 5803) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lafferty, K., Phillipson, S.N. & Jacobs, K. Conforming to Male and Female Gender Norms: A Characterisation of Australian University Students. Gend. Issues 38, 79–99 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-020-09259-y
- Gender norms