Faculty perceptions of teaching diversity: Definitions, benefits, drawbacks, and barriers

Abstract

Many U.S. universities have committed to teaching topics of diversity as part of their core curriculum. The purpose of the present investigation is to identify faculty definitions of diversity and the perceived benefits, drawbacks, and barriers of incorporating diversity components in university level teaching. Few other studies have examined how higher education faculty subjectively define diversity or perceive the incorporation of diversity into the curriculum they are responsible for teaching. Instructors-of-record completed a survey asking how they defined diversity as well as the benefits, drawbacks, and barriers of incorporating diversity issues into their teaching. Results show what is meant by the term “diversity” is not cohesively communicated to faculty, and faculty need additional training to prepare them to teach about these issues. Further, data also show the need for institutional-level support for faculty via training, preparation, and providing time to ensure faculty can adequately carry out the university’s directive in the courses they teach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Astin, A. W. (1993). Diversity and multiculturalism on the campus: How are students affected? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 25(2), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, M. J. (1984). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bigatta, S. M., Sanchez Gibau, G., Boys, S., Grove, K., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Khaja, K., & Thorington Springer, J. (2012). Faculty perceptions of multicultural teaching in a large urban university. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 78–93 Retrieved from www.iupui.edu/~josotl.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Billups, F. D. (2021). Qualitative data collection tools: Design, development, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, S. (2016). Diversity courses are in high demand: Can they make a difference? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 7, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, C., Fasching-Varner, K. J., & Brimhall-Vargas, M. (Eds.). (2012). Occupying the academy: Just how important is diversity work in higher education? Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deardorff, D. K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. In J. D. Penn (Ed.), Assessing complex general education student learning outcomes (pp. 65–79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dumas-Hines, F. A., Cochran, L. L., & Williams, E. U. (2001). Promoting diversity: Recommendations for recruitment and retention of minorities in higher education. College Student Journal, 35(3), 433.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, W., & Mager, G. (2011). Enhancing preservice teachers' sense of efficacy and attitudes toward school diversity through preparation: A case of one US inclusive teacher education program. International Journal of Special Education, 26(2), 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Griffith, R.L., Wolfed, L., Armon, B.K., Rios, J., & Liu, O.L. (2016). Assessing intercultural competence in higher education: Existing research and future directions (report no. ETS RR-16-25). Princeton, NJ: ETS.

  12. Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact of educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 9–42. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.01151786u134n051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2003). Diversity experiences and college student learning and personal development. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 320–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hurtado, S., Milem, J., Clayton-Pedersen, A., & Allen, W. (1999). Enacting diverse learning environments: Improving the climate for racial/ethnic diversity in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 26(8) Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED430514.pdf.

  16. Lee, J.J., & Espino, M.M. (2010). Diversity and service-learning: Beyond individual gains and toward social change College Student Affairs Journal, 29(1), 1-16. :

  17. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maruyama, G., Moreno, L. F., Gudeman, R. H., & Marin, P. (Eds.) (2000). Does diversity make a difference? Three research studies on diversity in college classrooms. Retrieved August I, 2002 from American Council on Education Web site: http://www.acenet.edu.

  19. Mayhew, M. J., & Grunwald, H. E. (2006). Factors contributing to faculty incorporation of diversity-related course content. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 148–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Milem, J. F., Chang, M. J., & Antonio, A. L. (2005). Making diversity work on campus: A research-based perspective. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moses, M., & Chang, M. (2006). Toward a deeper understanding of the diversity rationale. Educational Researcher, 35(1), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Plaut, V. C., Garnett, F. G., Buffardi, L. E., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2011). “What about me?” perceptions of exclusion and whites’ reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ryder, A. J., Reason, R. D., Mitchell, J. J., Gillon, K., & Hemer, K. M. (2016). Climate for learning and students’ openness to diversity and challenge: A critical role for faculty. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(4), 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sciame-Giesecke, S., Roden, D., & Parkison, K. (2009). Infusing diversity into the curriculum: What are faculty members actually doing? Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2(3), 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Valentine, K., Prentice, M., Torres, M. F., & Arellano, E. (2012). The importance of student cross-racial interactions as part of college education: Perceptions of faculty. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(4), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah R. Gordon.

Ethics declarations

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All gathered data was confidential, and participants were informed about all the proper details about the study and their role in it, including that they can withdraw at any point. Attaining formal and written informed consent was not regarded as necessary as voluntary completion of the questionnaires was regarded as providing consent, and no medical information was gathered.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University institutional review board (IRB approval number ED-17-23).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gordon, S.R., Yough, M., Finney-Miller, E.A. et al. Faculty perceptions of teaching diversity: Definitions, benefits, drawbacks, and barriers. Curr Psychol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01406-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Diversity
  • Teaching
  • Higher education
  • Curriculum