Skip to main content

The happiest and the saddest autobiographical memories and aging

Abstract

The present study investigated autobiographical memories of younger, middle-aged and older adults for the events that made them the happiest and the saddest in their lives. Participants generated these memory types and provided ratings about how positive and how negative the memory makes them feel when they currently think about it, and the positivity of the emotional content of the memory. Participants provided the age at which the event happened and rated the importance and effectiveness of the event in who they have become presently, and their perceived control over the event. Results provided supporting evidence for the positivity effect, by showing that older adults felt more positive about their memories. Middle-aged adults’ ratings resembled older adults’ for the happiest and younger adults’ for the saddest memories. Two young independent raters rated all descriptions of older adults’ memories. Results showed that young raters’ positive emotion ratings were lower than older adults, for both the happiest and the saddest memories. This result indicated that older adults do not access less negatively emotional memories or describe the memories more positively, but they just evaluate these memories more positively. Results showed a reminiscence bump for the happiest but not for the saddest memories, supporting the predictions of the Life Script Account. Additionally, results provided partial and rather weak support for the Life Story Account in younger and middle-aged adults, but not in older adults. The results indicate that older adulthood may be characterized by a more positive evaluation of life experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    Based on an alpha level of .05, we report marginally significant results as well. Research shows an increased tendency to report such results in articles in the last decade (for a discussion, see Pritschet et al. 2016). However, we interpret these marginally significant results cautiously in the discussion.

  2. 2.

    For the t-test comparisons in middle-aged adults, Levene’s Test was significant, and thus the values with non-equal variance assumption are reported.

References

  1. Akça-Kalem, Ş., Öktem, Ö., & Emre, M. (2002). Kısa Blessed oryantasyon-bellek- konsantrasyon testi (BOMC) ve standardize mini mental test (SMMT) betimsel istatistik değerlerinin bir normal erişkin Türk örnekleminde saptanması. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, 39, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2002). Emotionally charged autobiographical memories across the life span: The recall of happy, sad, traumatic and involuntary memories. Psychology and Aging, 17(4), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2004). Cultural life scripts structure recall from autobiographical memory. Memory & Cognition, 32(3), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanchard-Fields, F., Jahnke, H. C., & Camp, C. (1995). Age differences in problem-solving style: The role of emotional salience. Psychology and Aging, 10(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.10.2.173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckner, R. L. (2004). Memory and executive function in aging and AD: multiple factors that cause decline and reserve factors that compensate. Neuron, 44, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.006.

  6. Carstensen, L. L., & Mikels, J. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x.

  7. Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024569803230.

  9. Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2007). Emotion regulation and aging. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 307–327). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charles, S. T., Reynolds, C. A., & Gatz, M. (2001). Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Charles, S. T., Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Comblain, C., D'Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2005). Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for emotional and neutral events in older and younger adults. Experimental Aging Research, 31(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730590915010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Age-related changes in human memory. In D. C. Park & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 75–92). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Craik, F. I. M., & Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Demiray, B., Gülgöz, S., & Bluck, S. (2009). Examining the life story account of the reminiscence bump: Why we remember more from young adulthood. Memory, 17(7), 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210902939322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Erdoğan, A., Baran, B., Avlar, B., Taş, A. Ç., & Tekcan, A. İ. (2008). On the persistence of positive events in life scripts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Erikson, E. H., & Erikson, J. M. (1998). Major stages in psychosocial development. In E. H. Erikson (Ed.), The life cycle completed (pp. 55–82). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ford, J. H., DiBiase, H. D., Ryu, E., & Kensinger, E. A. (2018). It gets better with time: Enhancement of age-related positivity effect in the six months following a highly negative public event. Psychology and Aging, 33(3), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000250 supp (Supplemental).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fung, H. H., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Sending memorable messages to the old: Age differences in preferences and memory for advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gallo, D. A., Korthauer, L. E., McDonough, I. M., Teshale, S., & Johnson, E. L. (2011). Age-related positivity effects and autobiographical memory detail: Evidence from a past/future source memory task. Memory, 19(6), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.595723.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gatz, M., & Karel, M. J. (1993). Individual change in perceived control over 20 years. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502549301600211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gençöz, T. (2000). Positive and negative affect schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(46), 19–28. Retrieved from http://bproxy.bahcesehir.edu.tr:2062/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2001-17472-002&site=ehost-live.

  23. Gil, S., & Gilbar, O. (2001). Hopelessness among cancer patients. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 19(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1300/J077v19n01_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gluck, J., & Bluck, S. (2007). Looking back across the life span: A life story account of the reminiscence bump. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1928–1939. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271.

  26. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gross, J. J., Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Tsai, J., Skorpen, C., & Hsu, A. Y. C. (1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12(4), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Katzman, R., Brown, T., Fuld, P., Peck, A., Schechter, R., & Schimmel, Η. (1983). Validation of a short orientation-memory-concentration test of cognitive impairment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.140.6.734.

  29. Kennedy, Q., Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2004). The role of motivation in the age-related positivity effect in autobiographical memory. Psychological Science, 15(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503011.x.

  30. Klencklen, G., Després, O., & Dufour, A. (2012). What do we know about aging and spatial cognition? Reviews and perspectives. Ageing Research Reviews, 11(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.10.001.

  31. Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125.

  32. Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view". In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), The place of inhibition in cognition (pp. 145–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces. Psychological Science, 14(5), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moylan, K., & Lin, T. L. (Eds.). (2004). The Washington manual geriatrics subspecialty consult. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Orgeta, V. (2009). Specificity of age differences in emotion regulation. Aging & Mental Health, 13(6), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860902989661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parks, S. L., & Dollinger, S. (2014). The positivity effect and auditory recognition memory for musical excerpts in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 24(4), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pasupathi, M. (2001). The social construction of the personal past and its implications for adult development. Psychological Bulletin, 127(5), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.5.651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Phifer, J. F. (1990). Psychological distress and somatic symptoms after natural disaster: Differential vulnerability among older adults. Psychology and Aging, 5(3), 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Phillips, L. H., Henry, J. D., Hosie, J. A., & Milne, A. B. (2006). Age, anger regulation and well-being. Aging & Mental Health, 10(3), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860500310385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pritschet, L., Powell, D., & Horne, Z. (2016). Marginally significant effects as evidence for hypotheses: Changing attitudes over four decades. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645672.

  41. Reed, A. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2012). The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ritchie, T. D., Skowronski, J. J., Wood, S. E., Walker, W. R., Vogl, R. J., & Gibbons, J. A. (2006). Event self-importance, event rehearsal, and the fading affect bias in autobiographical memory. Self and Identity, 5(2), 172–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860600591222.

  43. Robertson, S. M. C., & Hopko, D. R. (2013). Emotional expression during autobiographical narratives as a function of aging: Support for the socioemotional selectivity theory. Journal of Adult Development, 20(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-013-9158-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (2002). Age and the gender gap in the sense of personal control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(2), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090097.

  45. Rubin, D. C., & Berntsen, D. (2003). Life scripts help to maintain autobiographical memories of highly positive, but not highly negative, events. Memory & Cognition, 31(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rubin, D. C., & Schulkind, M. D. (1997). The distribution of autobiographical memories across the lifespan. Memory & Cognition, 25(6), 859–866. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Salthouse, T. A. (2000). Aging and measures of processing speed. Biological Psychology, 54(1–3), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00052-1.

  48. Shiota, M. N., & Levenson, R. W. (2009). Effects of aging on experimentally instructed detached reappraisal, positive reappraisal, and emotional behavior suppression. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017896.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Tekcan, A. I., Kaya-Kızılöz, B., & Odaman, H. (2012). Life scripts across age groups: A comparison of adolescents, young adults, and older adults. Memory, 20(8), 836–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.710431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Walker, W. R., & Skowronski, J. J. (2009). The fading affect bias: But what the hell is it for? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 1122–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1614.

  51. Walker, W. R., Vogl, R. J., & Thompson, C. P. (1997). Autobiographical memory: Unpleasantness fades faster than pleasantness over time. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(5), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<399::AID-ACP462>3.0.CO;2-E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Ebru Arslanhan, Pelin Alpay, Hümeyra Minel Aykut, Zeynep Karataş, Hande Deveci, Şeyma Hilal Kaanoğlu, Ecem Akgül and Melike Alyurt for their help with data collection and data entry. We also thank Aylin Topçu and Berk Erdinç for their contributions to data collection.

Datasets are available from the first author upon request.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simay Ikier.

Ethics declarations

The authors state that there are no potential conflicts of interest about the manuscript. The study complies with the ethical standards of research involving human participants and informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study does not have financial support.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethics board of the previous institution of the first author (Yeditepe University Humanities and Social Research Ethics Review Board, Document Reference Number: 75078252–9000-0045/289) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ikier, S., Duman, Ç. The happiest and the saddest autobiographical memories and aging. Curr Psychol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00993-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Autobiographical memory
  • Aging
  • Positivity effect
  • Life script account
  • Life story account