Advertisement

Overseas study experience and global processing style

  • Jiansheng Li
  • Siya Wang
  • Hao Zheng
  • Defu Pan
  • Yue Wang
  • Yang Yang
Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

The current study explored whether overseas study experience is associated with global processing style. In Experiment 1, thirty students had overseas study experience and thirty students had not studied abroad were asked to complete a Navon task. The results showed that, compared to the students without overseas study experience, the students with overseas study experience tended to respond faster towards global letters. In Experiment 2, forty students had overseas study experience and forty students had not studied abroad were asked to look for similarities and differences between the two videos. The results revealed that, compared to students without overseas study experience, students with overseas study experience could find more similarities between objects. These findings indicated that there is a positive relationship between overseas study experience and global processing style.

Keywords

Global processing style Local processing style Processing styles Multicultural experience Overseas study experience 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Chi-yue Chiu, a professor of management and marketing at Nanyang Technological University. This research is supported by the Foundation for Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (1506RJYA120), the Gansu Provincial Social Science Foundation (YB027), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31760282).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Research Involving Human Participants

The study was conducted after obtaining Institutional Review Board approval from the department of Psychology at Northwest Normal University. We received the written consent of all participants before testing began. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. P., Segall, M. H., et al. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 501–520.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497964.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), Heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167–196). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G., Winkler, J., Buchel, C., & May, A. (2006). Temporal and spatial dynamics of brain structure changes during extensive learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6314–6317  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4628-05.2006.
  6. Förster, J., & Dannenberg, L. (2010). GLOMOsys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 175–197.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.487849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Förster, J., & Denzler, M. (2012). Sense creative! The impact of global and local vision, hearing, touching, tasting, and smelling on creative and analytic thought. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 108–117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611410890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477–492.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gasper, K. (2004). Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 405–421.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34–40.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Henderson, M. D. (2013). When seeing the forest reduces the need for trees: The effect of abstraction on attraction to choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 676–683.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492–499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00011-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leung, A. K. Y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. Y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1047–1061.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiack, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1999). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 4398–4403.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070039597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (2007). Mental construal processes: The inclusion/exclusion model. In D. Stapel & J. Suls (Eds.), Assimilation and contrast in social psychology (119–141). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & P. Ruzgis (Eds.), Personality and intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2007). Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1470–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wan, M., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., & Li, J. (2016). Do multicultural experiences facilitate global processing style? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 209–214.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthwest Normal UniversityLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Medicine Training CenterAir Force Dalian AeronauticalDalianPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Criminal Science and TechnologyNanjing Forestpolice CollegeNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations