Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is Emotional Suppression Always Bad? A Matter of Flexibility and Gender Differences

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although emotional suppression has usually been considered to be associated to psychopathological symptoms and aggression, different studies yielded controversial findings and highlighted possible gender differences in these relationships. In an attempt to cast light on this issue, we administered to a sample of 380 community-dwelling individuals the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Aggression Questionnaire and the Symptom CheckList-90-Revised. Gender differences (favoring women) emerged on the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Interestingly, associations of emotional suppression were only significant among females, and mainly regarded psychological distress. In an attempt to test whether the flexibility in the use of emotion regulation strategies was more important for psychological well-being, we tested interaction effects between reappraisal and suppression on psychopathological diseases and aggression measures. Significant interaction effects were found among men and only on aggressive measures. Such results confirmed gender differences in emotion regulation and the relevance of flexibility in the use of emotional regulation strategies as part of adaptive emotional functioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2011). When are adaptive strategies most predictive of psychopathology? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 276–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balzarotti, S., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2010). An Italian adaptation of the emotion regulation Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardeen, J. R., & Stevens, E. N. (2015). Sex differences in the indirect effects of cognitive processes on anxiety through emotion regulation difficulties. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., Lalande, K., Westphal, M., & Coifman, K. (2004). The importance of being flexible: the ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment. Psychological Science, 15(7), 482–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, B. H. (2010). Understanding the gender differences in pathways to social deviancy: relational aggression and emotion regulation. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 24(1), 27–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., & Lazarus, L. (1994). SCL-90—R, brief symptom inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. In M. E. Maruish & M. E. Maruish (Eds.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 217–248). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, J. J., Goranson, A. C., McClure, K. S., & Van Male, L. M. (2014). Emotion dysregulation, negative affect, and aggression: a moderated, multiple mediator analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. J., Hollenstein, T., & Mackey, A. (2010). The effect of suppressing and not accepting emotions on depressive symptoms: is suppression different for men and women? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 582–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossati, A., Maffei, C., Acquarini, E., & Di Ceglie, A. (2003). Multigroup confirmatory component and factor analyses of the Italian version of the aggression Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, R., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: the case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 427–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, C., & Velotti, P. (2015). Alcohol misuse in psychiatric patients and nonclinical individuals: the role of emotion dysregulation and impulsivity. Addiction Research and Theory, 23(4), 294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, C., Holden, C. J., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Velotti, P. (2016). Understanding the connection between self-esteem and aggression: the mediating role of emotion dysregulation. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 3–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., Paulson, A., Jakupcak, M., & Tull, M. T. (2009). Exploring the relationship between childhood maltreatment and intimate partner abuse: gender differences in the mediating role of emotion dysregulation. Violence and Victims, 24(1), 68–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1998). Mapping the domain of expressivity: multimethod evidence for a hierarchical model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 170–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Muñoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2(2), 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. Journal of Personality, 72, 1301–1333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundh, L.-G., Wikström, J., & Westerlund, J. (2001). Cognitive bias, emotion, and somatic complaints in a normal sample. Cognition and Emotion, 15(3), 249–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2012). Emotion regulation and psychopathology: the role of gender. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 161–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prunas, A., Sarno, I., Preti, E., Madeddu, F., & Perugini, M. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the SCL-90-R: a study on a large community sample. European Psychiatry, 27(8), 591–597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberton, T., Daffern, M., & Bucks, R. S. (2014). Maladaptive emotion regulation and aggression in adult offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(10), 933–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. P., DiLillo, D., Maldonado, R. C., & Watkins, L. E. (2015). Negative urgency and emotion regulation strategy use: associations with displaced aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 41(5), 502–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subic-Wrana, C., Beutel, M. E., Knebel, A., & Lane, R. D. (2010). Theory of mind and emotional awareness deficits in patients with somatoform disorders. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72(4), 404–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: a meta-analytic review and examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 2–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 775–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizia Velotti.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rogier, G., Garofalo, C. & Velotti, P. Is Emotional Suppression Always Bad? A Matter of Flexibility and Gender Differences. Curr Psychol 38, 411–420 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9623-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9623-7

Keywords

Navigation