Advertisement

East Asia

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 163–176 | Cite as

Asia’s Security Triangles: Maritime Minilateralism in the Indo-Pacific

  • Troy Lee-Brown
Article

Abstract

Since the early years of the twenty-first century, a number of key regional governments have consciously chosen to alter the way they talk about the region, and have now largely shifted from using the ‘Asia-Pacific’ to the ‘Indo-Pacific’ construct. But after three decades of utilising the ‘Asia-Pacific’ concept, why has this been the case and how might this shift in geographical conceptualisation alter the strategic framework of the region? This paper argues that the ‘Indo-Pacific’ is a regional reconceptualisation utilised by Japan, Australia, India and the USA to address deficiencies in Asia’s maritime security and institutional architecture, which are being simultaneously influenced by a more assertive Chinese posture and waning U.S. influence. Additionally, the Indo-Pacific concept has developed in tandem with a transformation in the regional security architecture. The utilisation of maritime minilateralism between Japan, India, Australia and the USA supplements Asia’s bilateral American alliances, with an array of trilateral security dialogues or ‘security triangles’. The Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific shift is really an instance of an emerging minilateral security regionalism, rather than the predominant forms of bilateral and multilateral security and economic regionalism that have dominated Asia in recent decades.

Keywords

Indo-Pacific Regionalism Minilateralism Security architecture Maritime Asia 

References

  1. 1.
    Abe, S. (2006) Towards of Beautiful Country: My Vision for Japan, New York: Vertical.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abe, S. (2007) “Confluence of the Two Seas’ – Speech by H. E. Mr. Shinzo Abe, Prime Minister of Japan at the Parliament of the Republic of India, 22 August’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/pmv0708/speech-2.html
  3. 3.
    Abe, S. (2012) 'Asia’s Democratic Security Diamond', Project Syndicate, December 27.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Acharya, A. (2001) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aso, T. (2006) ‘Arc of Freedom and Prosperity: Japan’s Expanding Diplomatic Horizons’, Minister of Foreign Affairs, November 30, Tokyo: Japan Institute of International Affairs Summit.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Attina, F. (2010) ‘Global Power Competition and the Rise of Minilateralism in Peace Operations’, in D. Imera and F. Attina (eds.), Multilateral Security and ESDP Operations, London: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Auslin, M. (2012) ‘The Struggle For Power in the Indo-Pacific’, Turkish Policy Quarterly, 10(3), 145–151.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Australia-Japan-US Joint Statement (2015) Japan-United States-Australia Defence Ministers Meeting, May 30, Canberra: Minister for Defence.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Australia-Japan-US Joint Statement (2016) Japan-United States-Australia Trilateral Strategic Dialogue, July 25, Canberra: Minister for Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bisley, N. (2007) ‘Asian Security Architectures’ in A. J. Tellis and M. Wills (eds.), Strategic Asia: Domestic Political Change and Grand Strategy, Washington: National Bureau of Asian Research.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bisley, N. (2016) ‘Indo-Pacific: The Maritime and the Continental’, ASPI, November 21.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brewster, D. (2010) ‘The Australia-India Security Declaration: The Quadrilateral Redux?’, Security Challenges, 6(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brewster, D. (2016) ‘Security in the Indo-Pacific Needs India’s Helping Hand’, The Wire, September 5. https://thewire.in/64160/trilateral-security-the-best-option-for-indo-pacific-relations/
  14. 14.
    Buzan, B. and O. Waever (2003) Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buzan, B. (2011) ‘The South Asian Security Complex in a Decentring World Order: Reconsidering Regions and Powers Ten Years On’, International Studies, 48(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carter, A. (2016), ‘The Rebalance and Asia-Pacific Security: Building a Principled Security Network’, Foreign Affairs, 95(6), November/December.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cha, V. D. (2010) ‘Powerplay: Origins of the US Alliance System in Asia’, International Security, 34(3), 158–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chellaney, B. (2008) ‘Obstacles to Overcome in the Development of a Concert of Asia-Pacific Democracies’, The Japan Times, February 20. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/eo20080220bc.html
  19. 19.
    Clinton, H. (2010) ‘America’s Engagement in the Asia-Pacific’, 28 October, U.S. Department of State, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Department of Defence (Australia) (2013) Defence White Paper 2013, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Department of Defence (Australia) (2016) Defence White Paper 2013, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Department of State (United States) (2015) ‘Inaugural U.S.-India-Japan Trilateral Ministerial Dialogue’, 29 September, Washington.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dirlik, A. (1998) ‘The Asia-Pacific Idea: Reality and Representation in the Invention of a Regional Structure’, in A. Dirlik (ed.), What Is in a Rim? Critical Perspectives on the Pacific Region Idea, New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    George, V. K. (2015) ‘India, U.S., Japan say Interests in Indo-Pacific Converge’, The Hindu, October 1. http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/trilateral-meeting-of-foreign-ministers-of-india-united-states-and-japan/article7708442.ece
  25. 25.
    Green, M. J. (2011) ‘Japan, India & the Strategic Triangle with China’, in A. J. Tellis, T. Tanner and J. Keough (eds.), Asia Responds to its Rising Powers: China and India, Washington: National Bureau of Asian Research, pp. 131–160.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Green, M. J. (2014) ‘Strategic Asian Triangles’ in S. Pekkanen, J. Ravenhill & R. Foot (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grossman, M. (2005) ‘The Tsunami Core Group: A Step Toward a Transformed Diplomacy in Asia and Beyond’, Security Challenges, 1(1).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haider, S. (2015) ‘India-Japan-Australia forum not anti-China: Peter Varghese’, The Hindu, June 9. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/chinas-actions-cause-for-concern-australia/article7295709.ece
  29. 29.
    Hall, I. (2017) ‘The Australia–India–Japan trilateral: converging interests and converging perceptions?’, The Strategist, March 17.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hu, R. W. (2009) Building Asia-Pacific Regional Architecture: The Challenge of Hybrid Regionalism, Washington: The Brookings Institution, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ikenberry, G. J. (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major War, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    India-Japan (2006) ‘Joint Statement Towards Japan-India Strategic and Global Partnership’, 15 December, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khurana, G. (2007) ‘Security of Sea Lines: India-Japan Cooperation’, Strategic Analysis, 31:1, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lang, D. (2015) ‘The Not-Quite-Quadrilateral: Australia, Japan & India’, ASPI Strategic Insights Series, July.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lang, D. (2015a) ‘Security interests draw Japan, Australia and India closer’, Japan Times, July 8. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2015/07/08/commentary/japan-commentary/security-interests-draw-japan-australia-india-closer/
  36. 36.
    Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994) ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, 19(3), 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Medcalf, R. (2014) ‘In Defence of the Indo-Pacific: Australia's New Strategic Map’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(4), 470–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miller, J. B. (2016) ‘US-Japan-India Trilateral Relations: Opportunities and Challenges’, The Asan Forum, December 8.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Japan) (2017) ‘Japan-Australia-India Trilateral Dialogue Senior Officials Meeting’, 29 April, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Modi, N. (2016) ‘PM Narendra Modi’s Speech in US Congress’, The Indian Express, June 10.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mohan, C. R. and R. Medcalf (2017) ‘Delhi, Tokyo, Canberra: They Could Build the First of Multiple Middle Power Coalitions for Regional Resilience in Trump’s World’, The Indian Express, February 10.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mulgan, A. G. (2008) ‘Breaking the Mould: Japan’s Subtle Shift from Exclusive Bilateralism to Modest Minilateralism’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(1), 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nagao, S. (2015) ‘The Japan-India-Australia “Alliance” as Key Agreement in the Indo-Pacific’, ISPSW Strategy Series, No. 375, September.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Naim, M. (2009) ‘Minilateralism: The magic number to get real international action’, Foreign Policy, June 21.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pan, C. (2014) ‘The ‘Indo-Pacific’ and Geopolitical Anxieties About China’s Rise in the Asian Regional Order, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(4), 456–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Phillips, A. (2016) ‘From Hollywood to Bollywood?: Recasting Australia’s Indo/Pacific Strategic Geography’, Strategy, ASPI.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Raghuvanshi, V. (2015) ‘Japan To Join Malabar as Permanent Participant’, Defense News, October 13. http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/naval/navy/2015/10/13/japan-join-malabar-permanent-participant/73828110/
  48. 48.
    Ravenhill, J. (2001) APEC and the Construction of Pacific Rim Regionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rogin, J. (2011) ‘Inside the First Ever US-Japan-India Trilateral Meeting’, Foreign Policy, December 23.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sahashi, R. (2009) ‘Conceptualising the Three-Tier Approach to Analyse the Security Arrangements in the Asia-Pacific’, Working Paper 415, Canberra: Strategic & Defence Studies Center.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sharma, A. (2010) ‘The Quadrilateral Initiative: An Evaluation’, South Asian Survey, 17(2), 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tillerson, R. (2017) ‘Remarks on Defining Our Relationship with India for the Next Century’, 18 October, CSIS, Washington D.C. https://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2017/10/274913.htm
  53. 53.
    Tow, W. (2009) ‘Assessing the Trilateral Strategic Dialogue’, East Asia Forum, February 12.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    White, H. (2016) ‘The Indo-Pacific: Talking About It Doesn’t Make It Real’. ASPI, November 22.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yoshihara, T. (2013) ‘The US Navy’s Indo-Pacific Challenge’, Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 9(1), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social SciencesUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations