Linking Necessity to Apriority
There is an important and fairly straightforward link between necessity and apriority which can shed light on our knowledge of the former, but initially plausible attempts to spell out what it is fall victim to counterexamples. Casullo (2003) discusses one such proposal, argues—following Anderson (Philosophical Topics 21(2):1–20, (1993))—that it fails, and suggests an alternative. In this paper, I argue that Casullo’s alternative also fails, before making a suggestion for which I can find no counterexamples and which, notably, handles some recent examples due to Kipper and Strohminger and Yli-Vakkuri.
KeywordsNecessity Apriority Epistemology
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Casullo, A. (2003). A priori justification. Oxford University Press USA.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, D. J. (2006a). Two-dimensional semantics. In E. Lepore & B. Smith (eds.), Oxford handbook of the philosophy of language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, D. J. (2006b). The foundations of two-dimensional semantics. In Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & J. Macia (eds.), Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications. Oxford University Press. pp. 55–140.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, D J. (2011). The nature of epistemic space. In Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic modality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kipper, J. (forthcoming). On what is a priori about necessities. Analysis.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S A. (1971). Identity and necessity. In Milton K. Munitz (ed.), Identity and individuation. New York University Press. pp. 135–164.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Peacocke, C. (1998). Being known. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Strohminger & Yli-Vakkuri (m.s.). (n.d.) On a priori knowledge of necessity. <https://philpapers.org/rec/YLIOAP> (Last accessed 18 March 2018.)