Skip to main content
Log in

Toward an Organic Theory for the Cultural-Historical Sciences

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In present-day cultural-historical sciences, explanations of activity are provided in terms of thing-like, independent, and self-actional entities including subject, object, tool, sign, mind, culture, meaning, and community. In this theory-building contribution, I instead suggest an organic theory to theorize activity in terms of events, characterized by actuality and becomingness. Organic theories have radical consequences for the cultural sciences in that cherished notions—e.g. mediation, identity, intersubjectivity, and cause–effect relation—no longer have a place in organic theories of human activity. This study describes the foundations of an organic approach, provides an analysis exemplifying an organic view, and develops some of its implications for the cultural-historical sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I use the term cultural-historical sciences and cultural-historical theories to refer to the complex of communities and theories that somehow anchor their origins in Vygotsky, Leont’ev, Luria, and others using varying labels to distinguish themselves from others.

  2. In some indigenous languages, animals, for example, are named by what they do, like a fish taking bate easily or disappearing into the woods quickly.

  3. Involuntary remembering similarly is to be understood as event that arises from and accompanies the events of material life, in which it has an organic function, as living memory, rather than being some static form: memory (Zinchenko 2008).

  4. Conscious awareness itself is theorized in terms of the specious present, that is, as a temporally extended phenomenon in which the past and future are part of the present.

  5. Dewey (1929) uses the example of a bullet entering the heart of a person. He shows why “the mere firing of the shot” (p. 448) cannot be the cause of death; and the entering of the bullet in the vital organs (e.g. the heart) cannot be the cause of dying because it is a constituent of it.

  6. The self-avowed intellectualism of Vygotsky’s work likely was one of the conditions why he never realized the aspirations of a “concrete human psychology” outlined in an eponymously entitled, fragmentary text (Vygotsky 1989).

References

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Dialogical imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1908). L’évolution créatrice [Creative evolution]. Paris: Félix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertau, M.-C. (2014). Inner form as a notion migrating from west to east: Acknowledging the Humboldtian tradition in cultural-historical psychology. In A. Yasnitsky, R. van der Veer, & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Handbook of cultural-historical theory (pp. 247–271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, A., & Rogoff, B. (2013). “On being indigenous” as a process. Human Development, 56, 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2008). Later works vol. 10: Art as experience. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University press. 

  • Dewey, J., & Tufts, J. H. (1936). Ethics (rev. ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1999). Knowing and the known. In R. Handy & E. E. Hardwood, Useful procedures of inquiry (pp. 97–209). Great Barrington, MA: Behavioral research council. 

  • Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ercikan, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2014). Limits of generalizing in education research: Why criteria for research generalization should include population heterogeneity and users of knowledge claims. Teachers College Record, 116(5), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional “trans-action”: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). System der Wissenschaft: Erster Theil, die Phänomenologie des Geistes [system of science: Part 1, the phenomenology of spirit]. Bamberg: Joseph Anton Goebhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il’enkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays on its history and theory. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longmans, Green.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1909). A pluralistic universe. New York: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1911). Some problems of philosophy: A beginning of an introduction to philosophy. New York: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1912). Essays in radical empiricism. New York: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1956). Werke II: Kritik der reinen Vernunft [works vol. 2: Critique of pure reason]. Wiesbaden: Insel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1978). Autrement qu’être ou au-delà de l’essence [Otherwise than being or beyond essence]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1962). Werke Band 23 [Works vol. 23]. Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). Werke Band 3 [Works vol. 3]. Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1932). Philosophy of the present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception [Phenomenology of perception]. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, R. (2001). Artifact mediation in Dewey and in cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8, 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1922). Nachgelassene Werke: Zweite Abteilung Band XVI [Unpublished works. Part 2 vol. 16]. Leipzig: Alfred Kröner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2016). Culture and participation: A paradigm shift. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 182–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2018). The invisible subject in educational science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50, 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2019). Transactional psychology of education: Toward the social in a strong sense. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation 1964–1972, Volume I & II. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J. (1999). The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, B. Pachoud, & J.-M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 266–329). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vološinov, V. N. (1930). Marksizm i filosofija jazyka: osnovnye problemy sociologičeskogo metoda v nauke o jazyke [Marxism and philosophy of language: Application of the sociological method in linguistics]. Leningrad: Priboj.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. (2006). Grundmotive einer Phänomenologie des Fremden [fundamental ideas of a phenomenology of the alien]. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1919). An enquiry concerning the principles of natural knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1920). The concept of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1926). Science and the modern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York: The free press. 

  • Zavershneva, E. J. (2010). The way to freedom. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(1), 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavershneva, E., & van der Veer, R. (Eds.). (2018). Vygotsky’s notebooks. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinchenko, V. (2008). Living memory. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 46(6), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolff-Michael Roth.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roth, WM. Toward an Organic Theory for the Cultural-Historical Sciences. Integr. psych. behav. 54, 286–307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09510-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09510-6

Keywords

Navigation