Gender Differences in Sex Secret Disclosure to a Romantic Partner

Abstract

This research investigated whether there are gender differences in revealing sex secrets to a romantic partner, including the number and type of secrets kept; method of disclosure; and outcome of that disclosure. Analysis of data from a 39-item Internet questionnaire completed by 195 undergraduate students revealed that over a third (36%) of respondents reported having one or more sex secrets, with gendered differences in the type of sex secrets being kept. Analyses revealed that women hid being the victim of sexual assault and/or that they had practiced or were interested in BDSM/kink play significantly more often than men. Men, by contrast, kept secret that they had engaged in sex with multiple partners at the same time (i.e., a ‘threesome’) significantly more often than women. Women hid their sex secrets because they feared their partners would not understand their past actions; men worried that their romantic partner would disapprove of their secret behaviors, whether understanding such experiences or not. Overall, both genders reported that disclosing sex secrets to their romantic partners had a positive outcome, individually and interpersonally.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data Availability

Data is available by request from the corresponding author.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Aldeis, D., & Afifi, T. D. (2015). Putative secrets and conflict in romantic relationships over time. Communication Monographs, 82(2), 224–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.986747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. (2015). Orgasm in college hookups and relationships. In B. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (2nd ed., pp. 280–296). W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23(5), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209345829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aylor, B., & Dainton, M. (2004). Biological sex and psychological gender as predictors of routine and strategic relational maintenance. Sex Roles, 50(9), 689–697. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000027570.80468.a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Azmoude, E., Firoozi, M., Sahebzad, E. S., & Asgharipour, N. (2016). Relationship between gender roles and sexual assertiveness in married women. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery, 4(4), 363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Balzarini, R. N., Campbell, L., Kohut, T., Holmes, B. M., Lehmiller, J. J., Harman, J. J., & Atkins, N. (2017). Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory. PloS One, 12(5), e0177841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks, T. R. (2019). Social-cognitive sexual scripts: measuring the sexual scripts of heterosexual men [Master's thesis]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

  10. Celik, G., Tahirogulu, A., Yoruldu, B., Varmis, D., Cekin, N., & Avci, A. (2018). Recantation of sexual abuse disclosure among child victims: Accommodation syndrome. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 27(6), 612–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020, January 17). Violence Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html

  12. Cowan, S. K. (2014). Secrets and misperceptions: The creation of self-fulfilling illusions. Sociological Science, 1, 466–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Montigny Gauthier, L., Vaillancourt-Morel, M. P., Rellini, A., Godbout, N., Charbonneau-Lefebvre, V., Desjardins, F., & Bergeron, S. (2019). The risk of telling: A dyadic perspective on romantic partners’ responses to child sexual abuse disclosure and their associations with sexual and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45(3), 480–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Easterling, B., Knox, D., & Brackett, A. (2012). Secrets in romantic relationships: Does sexual orientation matter? Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 8, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2011.623928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. (2008). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. The Gendered Society Reader, 3, 531–593.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fahs, B. (2010). Daddy’s little girls: On the perils of chastity clubs, purity balls, and ritualized abstinence. Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies, 31(3), 116–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fahs, B., & Plante, R. F. (2016). On ‘good sex’ and other dangerous ideas: Women narrate their joyous and happy sexual encounters. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fahs, B., & Swank, E. (2013). Adventures with the “Plastic Man”: Sex toys, compulsory heterosexuality, and the politics women’s sexual pleasure. Sexuality and Culture, 17(4), 666–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fielder, R. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Are hookups replacing romantic relationships? A longitudinal study of first-year female college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(5), 657–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frank, K. (2008). Not gay, but not homophobic’: Male sexuality and homophobia in the ’lifestyle. Sexualities, 11(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460708091743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hunter, S. (2007). Coming out and disclosures: LGBT Persons across the life span. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Hust, S. J., Rodgers, K. B., & Bayly, B. (2017). Scripting sexual consent: Internalized traditional sexual scripts and sexual consent expectancies among college students. Family Relations, 66(1), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iacovelli, A. M. (2011). Effects of emotional disclosure through face-to-face and Internet modalities on psychological and physiological adjustment (3421918) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

  25. Jackson, S. (1978). The social context of rape. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 1(4), 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaradat, A. M. (2020). An exploratory study of gender differences in self-disclosure: The case of college students in Jordan. North American Journal of Psychology, 22(3), 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kar, S., Choudhury, A., & Singh, A. (2015). Understanding normal development of adolescent sexuality: A bumpy ride. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 8(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.158594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Katz, J. N. (2005). The invention of heterosexuality. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Klinger, L. (2016). Hookup culture on college campuses: Centering college women, communication barriers, and negative outcomes. College Student Affairs Leadership, 3(2), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Knight, R., Shoveller, J. A., Oliffe, J. L., Gilbert, M., Frank, B., & Ogilvie, G. (2012). Masculinities, ‘guy talk’ and ‘manning up’: A discourse analysis of how young men talk about sexual health. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34(8), 1246–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(2), 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. LaFollette, H., & Graham, G. (1986). Honesty and intimacy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lindsey, L. L. (2015). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Malterud, K. B., & Bjorkman, M. (2016). The invisible work of closeting: A qualitative study about strategies used by lesbian and gay persons to conceal their sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(10), 1339–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mark, K. P., Garcia, J. R., & Fisher, H. E. (2015). Perceived emotional and sexual satisfaction across sexual relationship contexts: Gender and sexual orientation differences and similarities. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 24(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.242-A8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2013). Patterns of gender development. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 353–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Miller, L. (2016). Seeking the hiding: Working through parental infidelity. Clinical Social Work Journal, 44(3), 252–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Montemurro, B., Bartasavich, J., & Wintermute, L. (2015). Let’s (not) talk about sex: The gender of sexual discourse. Sexuality & Culture, 19(1), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Morehouse, R. K. (1977). Psychological androgyny and marital adjustment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. LSU Historical Dissertations and Thesis.

  40. Morgan, R. E., & Truman, J. L. (2018). Criminal victimization, 2017. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  41. Newman, C. E., Persson, A., Manolas, P., Schmidt, H. M., Ooi, C., Rutherford, A., & de Wit, J. (2018). “So much is at stake”: Professional view on engaging heterosexually identified men who have sex with men with sexual health care in Australia. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 15(3), 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Petronio, S. (1991). Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples. Communication Theory, 1(4), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00023.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Petronio, S., & Child, J. T. (2020). Conceptualization and operationalization: Utility of communication privacy management theory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pietromonaco, P. R., & Collins, N. L. (2017). Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rehman, U. S., Rellini, A. H., & Fallis, E. (2011). The importance of sexual self-disclosure to sexual satisfaction and functioning in committed relationships. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 3108–3115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Roggensack, K. E., & Sillars, A. (2014). Agreement and understanding about honesty and deception rules in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(2), 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sable, M. R., Danis, F., Mauzy, D. L., & Gallagher, S. K. (2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: Perspectives of college students. Journal of American College Health, 55(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.55.3.157-162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Siebenbruner, J. (2013). Are college students replacing dating and romantic relationships with hooking up? Journal of College Student Development, 54(4), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Thyer, B., & Myers, L. L. (1998). Social learning theory. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J137v01n01_03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ubando, M. (2016). Gender differences in intimacy, emotional expressivity, and relationship satisfaction. Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research, 4, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Walker, A. (2014). ‘Our little secret’: How publicly heterosexual women make meaning from their ‘undercover’ same-sex sexual experiences. Journal of Bisexuality, 14(2), 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Weiderman, M. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 209–232.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Whittier, D. K., & Simon, W. (2001). The fuzzy matrix of ‘my type’ in intrapsychic sexual scripting. Sexualities, 4(2), 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wong, W. C. W., Holroyd, E., Miu, H. Y. H., Wong, C. S., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, J. (2017). Secrets, shame and guilt: HIV disclosure in rural Chinese families from the perspective of caregivers. Vulnerable Children & Youth Studies, 12(4), 292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yu, T. (2014). Gender differences on self-disclosure in face-to-face versus E-mail communication. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication. https://doi.org/10.2991/icelaic-14.2014.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was garnered for this project. All work was completed voluntarily by researchers, with no incentives or profits provided by any university or external entity.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lacey J. Ritter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest with this project.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In addition, this project was approved by the university IRB prior to beginning the study.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Informed consent was established prior to beginning the survey. A statement was provided before questions were presented that detailed the goal of the study, the participant’s ability to stop the survey at any time, who to contact if the participant had any questions, and that by proceeding with the survey the participant agreed that they were over the age of 18.

Consent for Publication

The informed consent statement, mentioned in the above section, included consent for study participation and the publication of any significant or important findings from the research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fox, K., Ashley, A.M., Ritter, L.J. et al. Gender Differences in Sex Secret Disclosure to a Romantic Partner. Sexuality & Culture (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09880-3

Download citation

Keyword

  • Sex secrets
  • College students
  • Romantic relationships
  • Disclosure
  • Communication