Using a mixed methods approach this study compared young people’s reflections on their initial experience of coitus, exploring similarities and differences from a gender perspective, with regard to a reported desire to change, or not change, any aspect of the event. The sample population was comprised of 318 university students in the northeastern region of the United States (women n = 200, men n = 118). Thematic analysis was used to evaluate the open-ended question, “If you could go back in time to your first sexual intercourse, would you want to change anything? If so, what would you change and why?” Responses were subsequently transformed into quantitative measures for additional analyses. T-tests or chi-square tests were conducted to evaluate gender differences. Notable findings included a majority of both males (66.95%) and females (54.00%) reporting they would not want to change anything about their first coital experience. Among respondents who reported a desired change the three primary desired change themes were partner (15.72%), age (8.18%), and location (5.03%), although the percentages differed by gender. Qualitative responses to the most frequently reported desired change categories are presented to contextualize the quantitative data. The novelty of understanding what young people would change about their first sexual intercourse provides important contextual information to the research on the feelings experienced at first coitus.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The code for this study is not publicly available.
The data for this study is not publicly available.
Abma, J. C., Martinez, G. M., & Copen, C. E. (2010). Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, national survey of family growth 2006–2008. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 23. Data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 30, 1–47.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Ethier, K. A., Kann, L., & McManus, T. (2018). Sexual intercourse among high school students—29 states and United States Overall, 2005–2015. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(5152), 1393.
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2014). Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008. American Journal of Public Health, 104(S1), S43–S48.
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(9), 843–852.
Fortenberry, J. D. (2013). The evolving sexual health paradigm: transforming definitions into sexual health practices. AIDS, 27, S127–S133.
Fortenberry, J. D. (2014). Sexual learning, sexual experience, and healthy adolescent sex. In E. S. Lefkowitz & S. A. Vasilenko (Eds.), Positive and negative outcomes of sexual behaviors. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 144, 71–86.
Harvey, J. H., Flanary, R., & Morgan, M. (1986). Vivid memories of vivid loves gone by. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3(3), 359–373.
Higgins, J. A., Trussell, J., Moore, N. B., & Davidson, J. K. (2010). Virginity lost, satisfaction gained? Physiological and psychological sexual satisfaction at heterosexual debut. Journal of Sex Research, 47(4), 384–394.
Kreager, D. A., Staff, J., Gauthier, R., Lefkowitz, E. S., & Feinberg, M. E. (2016). The double standard at sexual debut: Gender, sexual behavior and adolescent peer acceptance. Sex Roles, 75(7–8), 377–392.
Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J. K., Driscoll, A. K., & Drake, P. (2018). Births: final data for 2016. National Vital Statistics Reports, 67, 1–55.
Mathews, T. J., & Hamilton, B. E. (2016). Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000–2014. NCHS Data Brief, no 232. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Meier, A. M. (2007). Adolescent first sex and subsequent mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1811–1847.
Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4), 477–507.
Rapsey, C. M. (2014). Age, quality, and context of first sex: associations with sexual difficulties. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(12), 2873–2881.
Reissing, E. D., Andruff, H. L., & Wentland, J. J. (2012). Looking back: the experience of first sexual intercourse and current sexual adjustment in young heterosexual adults. Journal of Sex Research, 49(1), 27–35.
Schwartz, I. M. (1993). Affective reactions of American and Swedish women to their first premarital coitus: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Sex Research, 30(1), 18–26.
Schwartz, I. M., & Coffield, E. (2020). A two dimension approach to understanding negative and positive affective reactions to first coitus. Sexuality & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09693-5.
Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000–2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 242–255.
Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Wells, B. E. (2017). Sexual inactivity during young adulthood is more common among US Millennials and iGen: age, period, and cohort effects on having no sexual partners after age 18. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 433–440.
Twenge, J. M., & Park, H. (2019). The decline in adult activities among US adolescents, 1976–2016. Child Development, 90(2), 638–654.
Wight, D., Parkes, A., Strange, V., Allen, E., Bonell, C., & Henderson, M. (2008). The quality of young people’s heterosexual relationships: A longitudinal analysis of characteristics shaping subjective experience. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 40(4), 226–237.
The authors did not receive any external funding for this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. (per instructions).
Human and Animals rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (include name of committee + reference number) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.” (per instructions).
The institutional review board of the authors’ organization approved the research.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.” (per instructions). Respondents were informed (through the survey text) that participation was regarded as giving consent.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Schwartz, I.M., Coffield, E. "If I Could Turn Back Time": Female and Male Reflections on Their Initial Experience of Coitus. Sexuality & Culture 25, 1308–1320 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09826-9
- First sexual intercourse
- Sexual development
- Reflections on first coitus
- Adolescent sexuality