Veiling Between Denigration and Glorification in Algeria


Veiling is a cultural practice that has created controversial debates since colonial intervention in Algeria. Such debates either condemn veils as “oppressive” or deify them as markers of cultural authenticity, and women are often seen either as “victims” of an “oppressive” culture or as “dignified” guardians of a “glorious” culture. Informed by postcolonial feminist scholarship exposing the political motivations of the debates associating women with culture, this paper outlines the history of the controversies about veiling in Algeria, where women’s bodies still serve as a battlefield in power-motivated struggles. The ongoing interpretation of Algerian women’s experiences within dichotomized discourses has harmful consequences on both women and their cultural practice. While veiling is getting mystified due to denigration and glorification, women’s lives are affected in different ways by the polemical debates. The most tangible effect is the violence endured by women because of the growing tensions between the two sides of the debates, which have intangible effects that are also detrimental. These debates are shaping and distorting the attitudes of so many women about veiling. Examined sources show that women’s opinion is divided between advocates and detractors of veiling, and arguments are repetitive of the same inconsistencies created throughout the long history of the power-motivated debates. Interpreting women’s attitudes in the light of dissonance theory shows that both women who advocate veiling and those who condemn it repeat inconsistencies often motivated by defensive purposes, which obscure vision and undermine scrutiny and inquiry in what would help settle the conflictual issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    ‘Colonial discourse’ is the equivalent of what Edward Said calls “orientalist discourse” which he used to describe how colonialism relied not only on military intervention and political rule to dominate the colonized, but also on a large variety of texts from different disciplines, which associated the will to know the Other with the will to maintain colonial domination (1979).

  2. 2.

    The literature advocating veiling as a religious requirement is now available through multiple websites, and it is still influencing women’s attitudes to veiling.

  3. 3.

    A popular Islamist political party which won success in the 1990s but was dismantled later.

  4. 4.

    The translations from French are my own throughout the paper.

  5. 5.

    The literature about the perpetrators of violence in the 1990s is highly controversial. Many sources repeat the thesis of the Algerian authorities accusing the dismantled party FIS for all the atrocities against civilians and especially against unveiled women (Djerbal 2003; Salhi 2010; Ghanem 2019). Yet other sources emphasize the responsibility of the Algerian state and the military for much of the violence endured by women and all Algerians. Relying on the testimonies of the survivors of violence and officers deserting the army, this second thesis argues that the state and the military are largely responsible for that violence (Pennell 2019; Roberts 1917; Bedjaoui 1999; Ladewig 2014). Whoever the perpetrators were, it seems that once again, women’s bodies and their lives were enlisted as a battlefield for political struggles.

  6. 6.

    “Al-Azhar” is a prestigious university for Islamic studies in Egypt, “Fatwa” is the Arabic word for legal ruling. Al-Azhar Fatwa Global Center is an electronic religious center in charge of interpreting Islamic legal rules to Muslims around the world.

  7. 7.

    Ijtihad in “Islamic law is the independent or original interpretation of problems not precisely covered by the Quran, Hadith (traditions concerning the Prophet Muhammad’s life and utterances), and ijma’ (scholarly consensus)” (Britannica 2018).

  8. 8.

    The excerpt is translated from Arabic by the author.

  9. 9.

    The changes can be tracked in the history of modification on the Facebook page where the statement is published.


  1. Abes, T. C. (2011). Algerian women between french emancipation and religious domination on marriage and divorce from 1959 Ordonnance no. 59–274 to the 1984 Code de la Famille. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 12(3), 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abi-Mershed, O. W. (2010). The apostles of modernity: Saint Simonians and the civilizing mission in Algeria. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abou El Fadl, K. (2014). Speaking in God’s Name: Islam, Authority. London: Oneworld publications.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bedjaoui, Y., Arroua, A., & Ait-Larbi, M. (Eds.). (1999). An Inquiry into the Algerian Massacres. Genève: Hoggar.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bouchareb, M. S. (2017). ظاهرة الحجاب في الجزائر: وظائف ودلالات من الواقع The Hijab Phenomenon in Algeria: Functions and Implications from Reality.” مجلة البحث العلمي في التربية Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 10(18), 259–268.

  7. Branche, R. (2009). Sexual violence in the Algerian war. In D. Herzog (Ed.), Brutality and desire: War and sexuality in Europe’s twentieth century (pp. 247–261). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Britannica, T. E. (2018). Ijtihad. (E. Britannica, Ed.)

  9. Cazeaux, M. (2013). Algérie 2012. Célébrer l'Indépendance sans les Algériens. Open Edition Journals.

  10. De Beauvoir, S. (1956). The second sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans). London: Jonathan Cape.

  11. Djerbal, D. (2003). La violence islamiste contre les femmes. Naqd, 22–23, 103–142.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fanon, F. (1965). A dying colonialism (Haakon Chevalier, Trans). NY: Grove.

  13. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghanem, D. (1919). The Shifting Foundations of Political Islam in Algeria. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved December 14, 2019, from

  15. Griffiths, M. E. H. (1909). Behind the veil in Persia and Turkish Arabia. London: Seeley & Co. LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2019). Understanding the motivation underlying dissonance effects. In E. Harmon-Jones (Ed.), Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (pp. 63–89). Washingdon D.C: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (2019). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. In E. Harmon-Jones (Ed.), Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (pp. 3–24). Washingdon D.C: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khanna, R. (2008). Algeria cuts: Women and representation, 1830 to the present. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ladewig, N. (2014). Between worlds: Algerian women in conflict. In G. Groot & C. Peniston-Bird (Eds.), A soldier and a woman: Sexual integration in the military (pp. 240–255). Florence: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lalami, F. (2008). L’Enjeu du statut des femmes durant la période coloniale en Algérie. Nouvelles Questions Féministes, 27, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lazreg, M. (1988). Feminism and difference: the perils of writing as a woman on women in Algeria. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lazreg, M. (1994). The eloquence of silence, Algerian women in question. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lazreg, M. (2009). Questioning the Veil, open letters to Muslim women. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lazreg, M. (2016). Torture and the twilight of empire: from Algiers to Baghdad. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McGregor, I., Nash, K., & Prentice, M. (2010). Reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 148–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McGregor, I., Newby-Clark, I. R., & Zanna, M. P. (2019). Dissonance now: How accessible discrepancies moderate distress and diverse defenses. In E. Harmon-Jones (Ed.), Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (pp. 117–138). Washingdon D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McMaster, N. (2012). Burning the veil: The algerian war and the ‘emancipation’ of muslim women, 1954–62. Manchester University Press.

  28. Messaoudi, K., & Schmela, E. (1998). Unbowed: An Algerian woman confronts Islamic fundamentalism. Khalida Messaoudi: Interviews with Elisabeth Schmela (A. C. Vila, Trans). University of Pennsylvania Press.

  29. Middle East Watch (MEW) (1992). Human Rights in Algeria Since the Halt of the Electoral Process. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved December 25,2020, from

  30. Minces, J. (1980). The house of obedience, women in arab society. London: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Under western eyes, feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 51–80). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). ‘Under Western eyes’ revisited: feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(2), 499–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pennell, C. R. (2019). The Algerian State, Islamist Insurgents, and Civilians Caught in Double Jeopardy by the Violence of the Civil War of the 1990s. Terrorism and Political Violence.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Perego, E. (2015). The veil or a brother’s life: French manipulations of Muslim women’s images during the Algerian War, 1954–62. The Journal of North African Studies, 20(3), 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roberts, H. (1917). The battlefield: Algeria, 1988–2002: Studies in a broken polity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Salhi, Z. S. (2010). The Algerian feminist movement between nationalism, patriarchy and Islamism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Spivak, G. C. (1994). Can the subaltern speak. In P. W. Chrisman (Ed.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: a reader (pp. 66–111). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stora, B. (2001). La Guerre invisible. Algérie années 90. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

  40. Tamzali, W. (2009). Une femme en colère. Lettre d’Alger aux Européens désabusés. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Woodhull, W. (1993). Transfigurations of the Maghreb: Feminism, decolonization, and literatures. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malika Boussoualim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boussoualim, M. Veiling Between Denigration and Glorification in Algeria. Sexuality & Culture (2021).

Download citation


  • Veil
  • Algeria
  • Culture
  • Religion
  • Postcolonial feminism
  • Dissonance theory