Skip to main content
Log in

Was 1992 a Turning Point for Homosexuals in Contemporary India?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For many familiar with contemporary India’s history of homosexuality, 1992 may be seen as a turning point. In 1992, activists protested against the infamous anti-sodomy law, Section 377 of the penal code, a provision which had been frequently employed by the police to harass the gay community. The public protest marked a historical point in the lives of the Indian homosexuals as the issue of homosexual citizenry entered public and popular discourse in contemporary Indian society. This paper seeks to establish the validity of 1992 as a historical point beyond the singular event of protest. It attempts to encourage one to consider the ways in which the increased political subjectivity of the homosexuals in contemporary India intersect with the historical emergence of the Hindu Right’s ideological hegemony from the 1990s. The added lens helps one to seek how the political and the personal can come together to identify, and invite discussion on, the varying statuses of different homosexual groups, ranging from lesbians to Muslim homosexuals, both of which tended to be marginally excluded from the emergence of a collective homosexual identity in the movement against Section 377.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Stein (2012, pp. 79–115).

  2. Dave (2012, p. 173).

  3. AIDS Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan (1991, p. 3).

  4. Lucknow (1992, p. 1135).

  5. For example, the 1973 declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association and the decriminalisation of homosexuality in the United Kingdom in 1967.

    See Stein (2012, pp. 143–181). 'The Cabinet Papers, 1915–1988' (2016).

  6. Altman (1997, pp. 417–436).

  7. See Vanita (2002, pp. 10–11).

  8. Section 377, Indian Penal Code (1860).

  9. See Scroll staff ‘Five excellent arguments for decriminalising gay sex that the Supreme Court ignored', Scroll, 29 January 2014. <scroll.in/article/655002/five-excellent-arguments-for-decriminalising-gay-sex-that-the-supreme-court-ignored> (15 April 2016).

  10. People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Karnataka (PUCL-K) (2001).

  11. See Foucault (2000, pp. 32–36).

  12. ABVA Memorandum to the Commissioner of Police (1992).

  13. Times of India (Bombay), 13 August 1992.

  14. Shahani (2008, p. 182).

  15. Narrain and Bhan (2005, p. 9).

  16. Ibid, pp. 9–11. See also, Tanna (1996). Shet (1995).

  17. Basu et al. (1993, pp. vii–ix).

  18. Jaffrelot (1996, pp. 449–481).

  19. Kapur and Cossman (1996, pp. 237–238).

  20. Jayaprasad (1991, p. 93).

  21. Bharatiya Janata Party (1998, p. 47).

  22. BJP Mahila Morcha (1991, p. 4).

  23. Kapur (2005), 60.

  24. Ibid, 40.

  25. BJP Mahila Morcha, ‘Women’s decade: Mahila Morcha Response’, 4.

  26. Bacchetta (1991, p. 160).

  27. Hansen (1999, p. 13).

  28. Paola Bacchetta, ‘When the (Hindu) Nation Exiles Its Queers’, pp. 141–166.

  29. Ibid, p. 148. See also, Golwalkar (1980, pp. 107–208).

  30. Golwalkar (1980, pp. 234–235).

  31. Ghosh (2010, p. 34).

  32. Ibid, 33–34.

  33. 'Shiv Sainiks strip to tease Dilip kumar over Fire' (1998).

  34. Pamesh Shahani, Gay Bombay, p. 281.

  35. Narrain and Gupta (2011, p. xxii).

  36. ABVA, Less Than Gay, p. 50.

  37. Sukthankas (2000).

  38. People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Karnataka (PUCL-K) (2003). See also Reddy (2005, pp. 17–43).

References

  • ABVA Memorandum to the Commissioner of Police, New Delhi. (November 8, 1992) (on file with the Alternative Law Forum).

  • AIDS Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan. (1991). Less than Gay: A Citizen’s Report on the status of homosexuality in India. New Delhi: Prince Offset Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, D. (1997). Global gaze/global gays. GLQ, 3(4), 417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchetta, P. (1991). When the (Hindu) Nation Exiles Its Queers. Social Text, 61, 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, T., et al. (1993). Khaki Shorts and Saffron Flags. Delhi: Orient Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharatiya Janata Party. (1998). Election Manifesto 1998.

  • BJP Mahila Morcha. (1991). ‘Women’s decade: Mahila Morcha Response. In Dashak Ke Jharokhe Mein. New Delhi: Bhartiya Janata Party.

  • Dave, N. N. (2012). Queer activism in India: A story in the anthropology of ethics. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000). The punitive society. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth/Michel foucault. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S. (2010). Fire: A queer film classic. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golwalkar, M. S. (1980). Bunch of thoughts. Bangalore: Sahitya Sindhu Prakashana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T. B. (1999). The Saffron wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffrelot, C. (1996). The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics: 1925 to the 1990s. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaprasad, K. (1991). RSS and Hindu Nationalism. New Delhi: Deep and Deep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, R. (2005). Erotic justice: Law and the new politics of postcolonialism. Oregon: Glass House Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, R., & Cossman, B. (1996). Subversive sites: Feminist Engagements with Law in India. New Delhi: Sage in Association with the Book Review Literary Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucknow, Z. (1992). India gets money to fight AIDS. British Medical Journal, 304(6835), 1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narrain, A., & Bhan, G. (2005). Introduction. In A. Narrain & G. Bhan (Eds.), Because i have a voice: Queer politics in India. New Delhi: Yoda Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narrain, A., & Gupta, A. (2011). Introduction. In A. Narrain & A. Gupta (Eds.), Law like love: Queer perspectives on law. New Delhi: Yoda Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Karnataka (PUCL-K). (2001). Human rights violations against sexual minorities in India: A case study of Bangalore.

  • People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Karnataka (PUCL-K). (2003). Human rights violations against the transgender community: A study of Kothi and Hijra sex workers in Bangalore.

  • Reddy, G. (2005). With respect to sex: Negotiating Hijra identity in South India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scroll staff. (15 April 2016). Five excellent arguments for decriminalising gay sex that the Supreme Court ignored, Scroll, 29 January 2014. scroll.in/article/655002/five-excellent-arguments-for-decriminalising-gay-sex-that-the-supreme-court-ignored.

  • Section 377, Indian Penal Code (1860).

  • Shahani, P. (2008). Gay Bombay: Globalisation, Love and (Be)longing in Contemporary India. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shet, S. (15 January 1995). ‘Helping for Men’, Mid-day, (Bombay).

  • Shiv Sainiks strip to tease Dilip kumar over. (13 December 1998). Hindustan Times.

  • Stein, M. (2012). Rethinking the gay and lesbian movement. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sukthankas, A. (2000). For people like us. In B. Bose (Ed.), Translating desire. New Delhi: Katha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanna, K. N. (22 March 1996). Elephantine Problems of the “Invisibles”. New Delhi: Hindustan Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Cabinet Papers, 1915–1988. (13 April 2016). The National Archives. www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/homosexuality.htm.

  • Vanita, R. (2002). Homosexuality in India: Past and present. Liberal Studies Faculty Publications, 29, 59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Tan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, N. Was 1992 a Turning Point for Homosexuals in Contemporary India?. Sexuality & Culture 23, 142–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9548-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9548-9

Keywords

Navigation