Ecocertification of Ecuadorian Bananas: Prospects for Progressive North–South Linkages

Article

Abstract

Results of our 2003 survey of Ecuadorian banana producers’ farming practices indicate that firms engaged in labeling schemes generate lower environmental risks than uncertified firms. Certified firms exhibit relatively comprehensive environmental management systems, while noncertified farms exhibited limited, uneven, and unstructured adoption of best management practices. We explore the specific circumstances that differentiate the more environmentally friendly firms from their conventional counterparts, and we identify the sustainability pathways available to differently situated firms engaged in banana production. We find that small certified operations mobilize social capital to engage alternative markets and add value to their products, while large certified firms rely on financial backing of international organizations to modernize their operations. For both large and small firms producing bananas in Ecuador, the sustainability gains we observe are premised on mobilization of external resources from actors in the industrialized world. We demonstrate that improved environmental performance of commodity production cannot be attributed to local resources, local dynamics, and local institutions. Our analysis also points to the limits of export of sustainability from rich nations to developing nation firms. Only a fraction of the industry participates in certification programs, and large segments of the population of firms are likely to remain unattractive and inaccessible to external resource providers. In this context, it appears that the state must define and enforce minimum environmental standards to progressively raise performance.

Keywords

Ecuadorian bananas Ecocertification Ecuador 

References

  1. AEBE. Asociacion de Exportadores de Banano del Ecuador [Association of Ecuadorian Banana Exporters]. AEBE, 2005. <http://www.aebe.com.ec/Desktop.aspx?Id=7> (accessed September 14 2007).
  2. AEBE. Lista de Socios [List of Members]. AEBE, 2007. <http://www.aebe.com.ec/Desktop.aspx? Id=8> (accessed September 14, 2007).
  3. Agrofair. Agrofair Europe BV: 2004 Annual Report. Agrofair, 2004. <http://www.fairtradefruit.com/upload/cms/AgroFair_English%20Annual%20 Report%202004.pdf> (accessed May 14, 2006).
  4. Altieri M. Sustainable agricultural development in Latin America: exploring the possibilities. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1992;39(1):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett C, Brandon K, Gibson K, Gjertson H. Conserving tropical biodiversity among weak institutions. Bioscience 2001;51(6):497–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartley T. Certifying forests and factories: states, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields. Polit Soc 2003;31(3):433–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonita Bananas. Agricultural practices. Bonita Bananas, 2007. <http://www.bonitaeurope.com/Paginas/Agricultural.htm> (accessed September 10, 2007).
  8. Brenes E, Madrigal K. Banana trade in Latin America. In: Josling T, Taylor T, editors. Banana wars: the anatomy of a trade dispute. Wallingford and Cambridge: CABI Publishing; 2003. p. 97–123.Google Scholar
  9. Bryant R, Goodman M. Consuming narratives: the political ecology of ‘alternative’ consumption. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2004;29(3):344–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler S. Supermarkets switch to fairtrade bananas. The Times, December 13, 2006. <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,5-2500985,00.html> (accessed December 20, 2006).
  11. Campbell H. The rise and rise of EurepGAP: European (re)invention of colonial food relations. Int J Sociol Agric Food 2005;13(2):1–19.Google Scholar
  12. Cashore B. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 2002;15(4):503–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D. Governing through markets: forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven: Yale University; 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Castillo L, Ruepert C, Solis E. Pesticide residue in the aquatic environment of banana plantation areas in the North Atlantic zone of Coast Rica. Environ Toxicol Chem 2000;19(8):429–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chambers R, Pacey A, Thrupp LA. Farmer first: farmer innovation and agricultural research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications; 1989.Google Scholar
  16. Chiquita Brands International. Case studies: human rights watch—child labor and freedom of association in Ecuador. Chiquita Brands International 2002 Corporate Responsibility Report. Chiquita Brands International, 2002. <http://www.chiquita.com/chiquitacr02/casestudies_01.htm> (accessed December 20 2006).
  17. Christmann P, Taylor G. Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China. J Int Bus Stud 2001;32(3):439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clay J. World agriculture and the environment: a commodity-by-commodity guide to impacts and practices. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  19. Cleuren HM, Henkemans AB. Development of the bamboo sector in Ecuador: harnessing the potential of Guadua angustifolia. J Bamboo and Rattan 2003;2(2):179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Constance D, Bonanno A. Regulating the global fisheries: the World Wildlife Fund, Unilever, and the Marine Stewardship Council. Agric Human Values 2000;17(2):125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dryzek J. The politics of the earth: environmental discourses. Cambridge, New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  22. Dusal Fruit. Organic products. Dusal Fruit, 2007. http://www.dusalfruits.com/organic.html (accessed September 10, 2007).
  23. El Guabo. PROMESA: Area ambiental. Asociación de Pequenos Productores de Banano El Guabo, 2006. <http://www.asoguabo.com.ec/espanol/promesa/promesambiental.htm> (accessed June 15, 2006).
  24. Euraque D. Reinterpreting the banana republic: regions and state in Honduras, 1870–1972. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  25. Evans P, Timberlake M. Dependence, inequality, and the growth of the tertiary: a comparative analysis of less developed countries. Am Sociol Rev 1980;45(4):531–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Excelban. Certificacion [Certification]. Excelban, 2005. <http://www.excelban.com/certificacion/ default.html> (accessed September 14, 2007).
  27. Fairtrade Foundation. Annual Review 2000/2001. Fairtrade Foundation, 2002. <http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/downloads/pdf/annreview1.pdf> (accessed May 15, 2006).
  28. Fairtrade Labeling Organizations (FLO). About FLO: Frequently Asked Questions. Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International, 2006a. <http://www.fairtrade.net/sites/aboutflo/faq.html> (accessed May 15, 2006).
  29. Fairtrade Labeling Organizations (FLO). 2006b. News Bulletin April 2006: FLO and SNV, a strategic partnership. Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International, 2006b. <http://www.fairtrade.net/sites/news/ News%20Bulletin%20April%202006.pdf> (accessed May 15, 2006).
  30. Fairtrade Labeling Organizations (FLO). About US: FLO’s Structure. Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International, 2006c. <http://www.fairtrade.net/structure.html> (accessed January 2, 2006).
  31. FAO. Contribution of bananas to income, employment and food security in Ghana and Ecuador. CCP: BA/TF01/4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Committee on commodity problems, Intergovernmental group on bananas and on tropical fruits, December/2001. FAO 2001. <http://www.fao.org/unfao/bodies/ccp/ba-tf/2001/default.htm> (accessed June 12, 2006).
  32. Favorita. Reseña de la Compañía. Favorita Fruit Company, 2003. <http://www.favoritafruitcompany.com/html/repons.htm#> (accessed May 20, 2006).
  33. Favorita. News of the Conference on the Sustainability of Certification Programs in IFC (sic). Favorita Fruit Company, 2004. <http://www.favoritafruitcompany.com/ ingles/htm/noticia_info.asp?sec=26> (accessed December 16, 2006).
  34. Favorita. BANANO, world wide high quality product: Certifications. Favorita Fruit Company, 2006. <http://www.favoritafruitcompany.com/ingles/htm/banano.htm> (accessed September 01, 2007).
  35. Feral M, Fisher H, Nielsen J, Smith A, Coats S. 2006. Dole, behind the smoke screen: an investigation into Dole’s banana plantations in Latin America. International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations (IUF), 2006. <http://www.iufdocuments.org/ www/documents/DoleReport-e.pdf> (accessed June 05, 2006).
  36. Frundt H. Central American unions in the era of globalization. Lat Am Res Rev 2003;37(3):7–48.Google Scholar
  37. Frundt H. Toward a hegemonic resolution in the banana trade. Int Polit Sci 2005;26(2):215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fruta Rica. Certificaciones Internacionales [Internacional Certifications]. Fruta Rica, 2007. <http://www.fruta-rica.com/frutarica/certificaciones.html> (accessed September 14, 2007).
  39. Goodland R. The concept of environmental sustainability. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1995;26(1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goodland R, Daly H. Environmental sustainability: universal and non-negotiable. Ecol Appl 1996;6(4):1002–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goodman D. Organic and conventional agriculture: materializing discourse and agro-ecological managerialism. Agric Human Values 2000;17(3):215–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grossman L. The political ecology of bananas: contract farming, peasants, and agrarian change in Eastern Caribbean. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  43. GTZ. 2003. Produktion von Biodünger im Bananenanbau ECU-01.1.009: Proyecto GTZ-IICA-FOMRENA. [Production of Compost in Banano]. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, 2003. <http://www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/de-inf-elguabo.pdf> (accessed June 13 2006).
  44. Hart S. The natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manage Rev 1995;20(4):986–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Henriques W, Jeffers R, Lacher T, Kendall R. Agrochemical use on banana plantations in Latin America: perspectives on ecological risk. Environ Toxicol Chem 1997;16(1):91–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Human Rights Watch (HRW). Tainted harvest. New York: Human Rights Watch; 2002.Google Scholar
  47. International Finance Corporation (IFC). 1998. Summary of project information. International Finance Corporation, Mar 31, 1998. <http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/lac.nsf/ Content/SelectedProject? OpenDocument&UNID=4232C5EB9F05B66B85256 88E00741372> (accessed June 6, 2006).
  48. Jannsen B. 2000. IFC-financed company first recipient of environmental certification. In International Finance Corporation Latin America and Caribbean Press Release, Washington, June 30 2000. <http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/LAC.nsf/Content/ SelectedPR?OpenDocument&UNID=053B12A2E8AFCDF1852569830068D9C6> (accessed June 6, 2006).
  49. Jansen K. Greening bananas and institutionalizing environmentalism: self-regulation by fruit corporations. In: Jansen K, Vellema S, editors. Agribusiness and society: corporate responses to environmentalism, markets opportunities and public regulation. London: Zed Books; 2004. p. 145–75.Google Scholar
  50. Kaplinsky R, Morris M, Readman J. The globalization of product markets and immiserizing growth: lessons from the South African furniture industry. World Dev 2002;30(7):1159–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kärnä J, Hansen E, Juslin H. Environmental activity and forest certification in marketing of forest products—a case study in Europe. Silva Fenn 2003;37(2):253–67.Google Scholar
  52. Key N, Runsten D. Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World Dev 1999;27(2):381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kydd J, Dorward A. The Washington consensus on poor country agriculture: analysis, prescription and institutional gaps. Dev Policy Rev 2001;19(4):467–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Le Fruit. Certifications. Le Fruit, 2007. <http://www.lefruit.com/contenido_in/ certificaciones_in.asp> (accessed September 10, 2007).
  55. Levi M, Linton A. Fair trade: a cup at a time. Polit Soc 2003;31(3):407–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. MAG. 2002. Operadoras del Programa de Modernizacion de Servicios Agricolas (PROMSA). Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderia, December 20, 2002. <http://www.mag.gov.ec/ promsa/operadoras_del_promsa.htm> (accessed June 10, 2006).
  57. Mazmanian D, Kraft M, editors. Toward sustainable communities: transition and transformations in environmental policy. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  58. McCarthy J, Prudham W. Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum 2004;35(3):275–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Melo C, Wolf S. Empirical assessment of eco-certification: the case of Ecuadorian bananas. Organ Environ 2005;18(3):287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moberg M. Fairtrade and Eastern Caribbean banana farmers: rhetoric and reality in the anti-globalization movement. Human Organ 2005;64(1):4–15.Google Scholar
  61. Mol P, Spaargaren G. From additions and withdrawals to environmental flows: reframing debates in the environmental social sciences. Organ Environ 2005;18(1):91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Muños-Carpena R, Ritter A, Socorro A, Perez N. Nitrogen evolution and fate in a Canary Islands (Spain) sprinkler fertigated banana plot. Agric Water Manag 2002;52(2):93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Murray D, Raynolds L. Alternative trade in bananas: obstacles and opportunities for progressive social change in the global economy. Agric Human Values 2000;17(1):65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mutersbaugh T. The number is the beast: a political economy of organic-coffee certification and producer unionism. Environ Plann A 2002;34(7):1165–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. OECD. Eco-labelling: actual effects of selected programmes. OECD Working Paper 1997; 5.Google Scholar
  66. OECD. Voluntary approaches for environmental policy: environmental effectiveness, economic efficiency, and usage in policy mixes. Paris: OECD Publications Service; 2003.Google Scholar
  67. Ott R, Longnecker M. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Pacific Grove: Duxbury; 2001.Google Scholar
  68. Peet R, Watts M. Introduction: development theory and environment in an age of market triumphalism. Econ Geogr 1993;69(3):227–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pfeffer J, Salancik J. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row; 1978.Google Scholar
  70. Porter G. Trade competition and pollution standards: race to the bottom or stuck at the bottom. J Environ Dev 1999;8(2):133–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Porter ME, van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 1995;9(4):97–118.Google Scholar
  72. Rainforest Alliance. Profiles in Sustainable Agriculture: Favorita’s Standard of Excellence. Rainforest Alliance, April 26, 2005. <http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/profiles/documents/FavoritaProfilewithhorizon.pdf> (accessed June 10 2006).
  73. Rainforest Alliance. Certified Farms List. Rainforest Alliance, August 01, 2007. <http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/agriculture/documents/ rainforest_alliance_certified_farms.pdf> (accessed September 02 2007).
  74. Reardon T, Codron J, Bush L, Bingen J, Harris C. Global change in agrifood grades and standards: agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries. Int Food Agribusiness Manag Rev 2001;2(3,4):421–35.Google Scholar
  75. Redaccion Guayaquil. Nuevos negocios se ponen en el negocio bananero. [New opportunities for banana businesses]. El Comercio, November 28, 2003a. <http://www.elcomercio.com.ec/solo_texto_search.asp?id_noticia=79727&anio=2003&mes=11&dia=28> (accessed May 15, 2006).
  76. Redaccion Guayaquil. Hoy se inicia el paro nacional de los bananeros. [Today begins “bananeros” nacional strike]. El Comercio, May 19 2003b. <http://www.elcomercio.com.ec/solo_texto_search.asp?id_noticia=61441&anio=2003&mes=5&dia=19> (accessed May 15, 2006).
  77. Redaccion Quito. La paralización bananera concluyo. [The banana strike comes to an end] El Comercio, October 20 2003. <http://www.elcomercio.com.ec/solo_texto_search.asp?id_noticia=76211&anio=2003&mes=10&dia=20> (accessed May 15, 2006).
  78. Ryan B, Joiner B. Minitab handbook. Pacific Grove: Duxbury; 2001.Google Scholar
  79. SICA. Resultados del Tercer Censo Agropecuario. Servicio de Informacion y Censo Agropecuario del Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderia. SICA 2002. <http://www.sica.gov.ec/censo/index.htm> (accessed May 16, 2006).
  80. SNV. Some Cases from the SNV/SSU RG on Trade in Agricultural Products. Reference Guide to Integrated Land and Water Resources Management. SNV 2004. <http://www.snvworld.org/cds/RGILWM/cases.htm> (accessed December 10, 2006).
  81. Soluri J. People, plants and pathogens: the eco-social dynamics of export banana production in Honduras, 1875–1950. Hisp Am Rev 2000;80(3):463–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Striffler R. In the shadows of state and capital: the united fruit company, popular struggle, and agrarian restructuring in Ecuador, 1900–1995. Durham: Duke University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  83. Talbot J. Where does your coffee dollar go?: The division of income and surplus along the coffee commodity chain. Stud comp int dev 1997;32(1):56–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Taylor J, Scharlin P. Smart Alliance: how a global corporation and environmental activists transformed a tarnished brand. New Haven and London: Yale University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  85. Torres Zorilla J. Agricultural modernization and resource deterioration in Latin America. San Jose (Costa Rica): Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA); 1994. Program Paper Series 45.Google Scholar
  86. UN. Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian and disaster relief assistance of the United Nations, including special economic assistance: strengthening of the coordination of emergency humanitarian assistance of the UN A/53/139 - E/1998/67. United Nations, June 12 1998. <http://www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/docs/1998/e1998-67.htm> (accessed May 25, 2006) 1998.
  87. United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP). Integrated assessment of trade liberalization and trade-related policies: a country study on the banana sector in Ecuador. New York and Geneva: United Nations; 2002.Google Scholar
  88. Willie C. [Rainforest Alliance, Chief of Sustainable Agriculture Programmes]. 2006. Phone interview by the author. Rainforest Alliance office, Costa Rica, June, 15 2006.Google Scholar
  89. Wilson G, Riggs J. Post productivist agricultural regimes and the South: discordant concepts. Prog hum geogr 2003;27(6):681–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wolf S, Hufnagl-Eichiner S. External resources and development of forest landowner collaboratives. Soc nat resour 2007;20(8):675–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wong R. Favorita Fruit Company: Speech by Rafael Wong at the Royal Botanical Gardens, Surry, UK. September 19, 2001. Archives of Rainforest Alliance, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  92. Wong R. 2003. La reputacion de la empresa a partir del uso de la Responsabilidad Social como instrumento de la Competitividad [Company’s reputation using Social Responsability as a competitive benchmark]. Inter-American Development Bank: The IDB and Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean, October 23, 2003. <http://www.iadb.org/csramericas/2003/doc/wong.pdf> (accessed June 15, 2006).

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International RelationsFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural ResourcesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations