Elsevier’s (Scopus) CiteScore, a journal-based metric (JBM), has been assigned to more journals than Clarivate Analytics’ Journal Impact Factor (JIF), including journals indexed by Scopus that do not carry a JIF. Unlike JIFs, CiteScore values are openly accessible. The advertisement of CiteScore, like other metrics, by journals or publishers may be in violation of DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) principles. While use of the CiteScore can provide interesting information about how a journal is being cited, the use of this JBM as a “quality” metric is cautioned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Select examples: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/12/12/citescore-flawed-but-still-a-game-changer/; https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/01/11/the-measure-of-all-things-some-notes-on-citescore/ (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
WoS also indexes conference proceedings, but it is unclear if a JIF has been assigned to any of them: http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience/cpci/ (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/blog/citescore-a-non-rival-for-the-journal-impact-factor/ (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
It would be important to understand how applications for indexing are handled by WoS (including ESCI (Emerging Sources Citation Index)) and Scopus, as well as the transparency behind delisting.
https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/318284/ACAD_RM_FS_CiteScoremetrics_WEB.pdf (of these, 289 are in library and information sciences, with Scientometrics ranked 20th) (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
https://www.scopus.com/sources (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
Data drawn from SCIE + SSCI data in 2018 JIF dataset released by JCR in June of 2019.
https://www.elsevier.com/?a=91173 (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/postharvest-biology-and-technology/ (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
https://twitter.com/schneiderleonid/status/1005002314183299072 (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
Curiously, they only invoked the use of other Scopus-based metrics (Source-Normalised Impact per Paper (SNIP) and Scimago Journal Rank (SJR)) to support their argument, ignoring the JIF totally, supporting arguments that CiteScore is JIF’s arch-rival among JBMs . The same group repositioned their comparison by including the JIF .
https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/239078/CiteScore_TermsAndConditions.pdf (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/aaaj.htm (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
Clause 6, for publishers: “Greatly reduce emphasis on the journal impact factor as a promotional tool, ideally by ceasing to promote the impact factor or by presenting the metric in the context of a variety of journal-based metrics (e.g., 5-year impact factor, EigenFactor , SCImago , h-index, editorial and publication times, etc.) that provide a richer view of journal performance.” (last accessed: May 15, 2020).
Teixeira da Silva JA. The Journal Impact Factor (JIF): science publishing’s miscalculating metric. Acad Quest. 2017;30(4):433–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12129-017-9671-3.
Roldan-Valadez E, Salazar-Ruiz SY, Ibarra-Contreras R, Rios C. Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Ir J Med Sci. 2019;188:939–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1936-5.
Teixeira da Silva JA, Memon AR. CiteScore: a cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric? Scientometrics. 2017;111(1):553–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2250-0.
Fernandez-Llimos F. Differences and similarities between Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore. Pharm Pract. 2018;16(2):1282. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.02.1282.
Moed HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. J Inform. 2010;4(3):265–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002.
Waltman L, van Eck NJ, van Leeuwen TN, Visser MS. Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator. J Inform. 2013;7(2):272–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.011.
Teixeira da Silva JA, Bernès S. Clarivate Analytics: continued omnia vanitas impact factor culture. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(1):291–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9873-7.
de Keyser P. Indexing the web. In: Indexing. From Thesauri to the Semantic Web. Chandos Publishing. 2012; p. 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-292-2.50011-8.
Teixeira da Silva JA. Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies? Scientometrics. 2017;112(3):1853–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2430-y.
Shu F, Quan W, Chen B-K, Qiu J-P, Sugimoto CR, Larivière V. The role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure system. Scientometrics. 2020;122(3):1683–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03339-x.
Quan W, Chen B-K, Shu F. Publish or impoverish: an investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999-2016). Aslib J Inf Manag. 2017;69(5):486–502. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0014.
Li J-T. On the advancement of highly cited research in China: an analysis of the Highly Cited database. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4):e0196341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196341.
Johnson R, Watkinson A, Mabe M. The STM Report: an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing, October, 5th edition, by the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands. 2018. p. 213. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2020.
Xie Q-N, Freeman RB. Bigger than you thought: China’s contribution to scientific publications and its impact on the global economy. China World Econ. 2019;27(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12265.
Chua SK, Qureshi AM, Krishnan V, Pai DR, Kamal LB, Gunasegaran S, Afzal MZ, Ambawatta L, Gan J-Y, Kew P-Y, Winn T, Sood S. The impact factor of an open access journal does not contribute to an article’s citations. F1000Research. 2017;6:208. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10892.1.
James C, Colledge L, Meester W, Azoulay N, Plume A. CiteScore metrics: creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index. Learned Publishing. 2019;32(4):367–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1246.
van Noorden R. Controversial impact factor gets a heavyweight rival. Nature. 2016;540(7633):325–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.21131.
Asadi H, Mostafavi E. The productivity and characteristics of Iranian Biomedical Journal (IBJ): a scientometric analysis. Iran Biomed J. 2018;22(6):362–6. https://doi.org/10.29252/.22.6.362.
Atayero AA, Popoola SI, Egeonu J, Oludayo O. Citation analytics: data exploration and comparative analyses of CiteScores of open access and subscription-based publications indexed in Scopus (2014–2016). Data Brief. 2018;19:198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.005.
Ivar do Sul JA, Tagg AS, Labrenz M. Exploring the common denominator between microplastics and microbiology: a scientometric approach. Scientometrics. 2018;117(3):2145–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2936-y.
Okagbue HI, Atayero AA, Adamu PI, Bishop SA, Oguntunde PE, Opanuga AA. Exploration of editorial board composition, Citescore and percentiles of Hindawi journals indexed in Scopus. Data Brief. 2018;19:743–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.066.
Brown T, Gutman SA. Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals. Scand J Occup Therapy. 2019;26(7):475–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2018.1473489.
Brown T, Gutman SA. A comparison of bibliometric indicators in occupational therapy journals published in English. Can J Occup Ther. 2019;86(2):125–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417419831453.
Krueger TM, Lelkes A-MT. Bibliometric measures and journal characteristics of leading accounting and finance journals. J Account Financ. 2019;19(7):87–101. https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v19i7.2564.
Okagbue HI, Adamu PI, Bishop SA, Obasi ECM, Akinola AO. Curve estimation models for estimation and prediction of impact factor and citescore using the journal percentiles: a case study of telecommunication journals. Int J Online Biomed Eng. 2019;15(14):31–40. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i14.11373.
Okagbue HI, Bishop SA, Adamu PI, Opanuga AA, Obasi ECM. Analysis of percentiles of computer science, theory and methods journals: Citescore versus impact factor. DESIDOC J Library Inf Technol. 2020;40(1):359–65. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.1.14866.
Zhang Y, Thenkabail PS, Wang P. A bibliometric profile of the Remote Sensing open access journal published by MDPI between 2009 and 2018. Remote Sens. 2019;11(1):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11010091.
Villaseñor-Almaraz M, Islas-Serrano J, Murata C, Roldan-Valadez E. Impact factor correlations with Scimago Journal Rank, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, Eigenfactor Score, and the CiteScore in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging journals. Radiol Med. 2019;124:495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-00996-z.
Okagbue HI, Bishop SA, Oguntunde PE, Adamu PI, Opanuga AA, Akhmetshin EM. Modified CiteScore metric for reducing the effect of self-citations. Telkomnika. 2019;17(6):3044–9. https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v17i6.12292.
Wei M-K. Research on impact evaluation of open access journals. Scientometrics. 2020;122(2):1027–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03306-6.
Dehghanbanadaki H, Khademsharif M, Aazami H, Azimi A. 32-year scientometric analysis of the Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:1. https://doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.1.
Okagbue HI, Teixeira da Silva JA. Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top-ranked library and information science journals. Scientometrics. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03457-x(in press).
Neff MW. How academic science gave its soul to the publishing industry. Issues Sci Technol. 2020;36(2):35–43.
Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J, Tsigaris P, Al-Khatib A. Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: an assessment. J Acad Librarianship. 2019;45(6):102071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071.
Meho LI. Using Scopus’s [sic] CiteScore for assessing the quality of computer science conferences. J Inform. 2019;13(1):419–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.006.
Teixeira da Silva JA, Sorooshian S, Al-Khatib A. Cost-benefit assessment of congresses, meetings or symposia, and selection criteria to determine if they are predatory. Walailak J Sci Technol. 2017;14(4):259–65.
Al-Hoorie AH, Vitta JP. The seven sins of L2 research: a review of 30 journals’ statistical quality and their CiteScore, SJR, SNIP, JCR Impact Factors. Lang Teach Res. 2019;23(6):727–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818767191.
Krauskopf E. Sources without a CiteScore value: more clarity is required. Scientometrics. 2020;122(3):1801–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03350-7.
Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J. Editors moving forward: stick to academic basics, maximize transparency and respect, and enforce the rules. Recenti Prog Med. 2018;109(5):263–6. https://doi.org/10.1701/2902.29244.
Ferrand É, Larivière V, Lebel D, Bussières J-F. Indicateurs de notoriété des revues scientifiques, des chercheurs et des articles publiés en santé: perspective pharmaceutique. Ann Pharm Françaises. 2019;77(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2018.09.001(in French with English abstract).
Colledge L, James C, Azoulay N, Meester W, Plume A. CiteScore metrics are suitable to address different situations—a case study. Eur Sci Edit. 2017;43(2):27–31. https://doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2017.43.003.
Cerpa N, Pejić-Bach M. Editorial: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research—CiteScore metric from Scopus. J Theor Appl Electron Commerce Res. 2018;13(3):1–2. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762018000300101.
Gedda M. Bibliometric indices and French-language physiotherapy journals. Kinesitherapie la Revue. 2018;18(198):9–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kine.2018.02.004.
Vrabel M. Beyond the impact factor. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019;46(2):143–5. https://doi.org/10.1188/19.ONF.143-145.
The author thanks Dr. Joseph P. Vitta (Rikkyo University, Japan) for kind input, comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the paper.
Conflicts of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest of relevance to this topic.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. CiteScore: Advances, Evolution, Applications, and Limitations. Pub Res Q (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09736-y
- Biomedical science
- DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment)
- Journal-based metric
- Journal Impact Factor (JIF)
- r (Pearson’s correlation coefficient)
- ρ (rs)
- Spearman’s correlation coefficient)