Abstract
This study of humanities and social science dissertations published by university presses considers revised dissertations [RD’s] and their salient characteristics. Often dissertations in the humanities and social sciences become the sine qua non for advancement in academia; therefore, it is instructive to ascertain the ecology of dissertations published by university presses. Only revised dissertations [RD’s], and English language presses were surveyed from proprietary data provided by a North American book distributor [Yankee Book Peddler, Inc.] and were triaged for bibliographic aspects as well as for intellectual coverage. Disciplinary alignment, subject specializations, geographical distribution, as well degree of interdisciplinarity, and series publication highlight findings. Library of Congress Classification further articulated disciplinary orientation. Oxford and Cambridge University Presses, but presses are specialized by subject emphases. A significant number of RD’s are interdisciplinary, Eurocentric in subject and geographical coverage, historically oriented across LC Classes, and appear as titles in monographic series.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The author expresses thanks and acknowledges the permission and assistance in retrieving the necessary proprietary and gross data for this study, especially Jen Legier and her colleagues at Yankee Book Peddler, without which this study would be impossible.
LC Code A—General works; B—Philosophy, psychology, religion; C—Auxiliary sciences of history (general); D—World history (except American history); E—American history; F—Local history of the United States and British, Dutch, French, and Latin America; G—Geography, anthropology, recreation; H—Social sciences; J—Political science; K—Law; L—Education; M—Music; N—Fine arts; P—Language and literature; Q—Science; R—Medicine; S—Agriculture; T—Technology; U—Military science; V—Naval science; Z—Bibliography, library science.
References
Armstrong R. The dissertation’s deadly sins. Sch Publ. 1972;3:241–7.
Boyer CJ. The doctoral dissertation as an information source: a study of scientific information flow. Metuchen: Scarecrow Press; 1973.
Buchanan AL, Hérubel J-PVM. The doctor of philosophy degree: a selective, annotated bibliography. Westport: Greenwood Press; 1995.
Cronin B, La Barre K. Mickey Mouse and Milton: book publishing in the humanities. Learn Publ. 2004;17:85–98.
Dowling W. Avoiding the warmed-over dissertation. Sch Publ. 1973;4:235–8.
Estabrook L. The book as the gold standard for tenure and promotion in the humanistic disciplines. (2003). http://cirss.lis.illinois.edu/pdf/BookGoldStandard.pdf.
Germano WP. From dissertation to book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
Hérubel JPVM. Observations on revised art history dissertations published by University Press. J Sch Publ. 2016;47:336–46.
Hérubel J-PVM. Dissertations into books: bibliographic and scholarly considerations of revised history dissertations published by University Presses,” for 12th international conference on webometrics, informetrics, and scientometrics (WIS) and the 17th COLLNET meeting 2016, 12–15th December, Nancy, France (2016).
Jagodzinski CM. The University Press in North America: a brief history. J Sch Publ. 2008;40:1–20.
Mulholland J. What I’ve learned about revising a dissertation. J Sch Publ. 2011;43:39–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hérubel, JP.V.M. Humanities and Social Science Dissertations Published by University Presses: 2010–2014, Exploratory Observations. Pub Res Q 33, 445–455 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-017-9536-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-017-9536-1