Skip to main content
Log in

Erving Goffman as Sorcerer’s Apprentice

A Reappraisal of the Schelling-Goffman Relationship

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thomas Schelling and Erving Goffman: who influenced whom, when and to what effect? Was there “influence” at all or, as Tom Burns suggests, independent discovery and convergence? These are the questions that this paper is meant to answer. Using available archival material and historical and textual analysis, the paper takes a fresh look at Goffman’s interest in and contribution to game theory. It charts the important first meeting in the late 1950s, their subsequent dialogue through publications, and the critical 1964 conference on “Strategic Interaction and Conflict,” where Goffman encountered an assembly of defense and nuclear strategists associated with the RAND Corporation. These include Daniel Ellsberg, who was a sharp critic of Goffman’s conference presentation, Albert Wohlstetter and, of course, Tom Schelling. During the heated discussion that accompanied Goffman’s presentation, the session chairman gave Goffman the sobriquet sorcerer’s “apprentice.” Ever the ally, Schelling said that he was sympathetic to Goffman’s “style of

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The author is most grateful to Dr. Winkin for sharing this letter (Schelling 1991).

  2. See Schelling (1980 [1960]: 115-16n20, 128n8, and 149n22).

  3. In his survey of sociology and game theory, Richard Swedberg (2001: 315) identifies Jessie Bernard as a “pioneer” in the field and Goffman as someone who had offered “scattered but lively discussions” of game theory in his works.

  4. For a discussion of the conversation that took place during the session on “The Concept of Rationality,” see (Erickson et al. 2013: 16–26).

  5. Goffman’s phrase “massive interdependence” offered an unfortunate echo of John Foster Dulles’s principle of “massive retaliation,” a cornerstone of the Eisenhower-era nuclear strategy that had been rejected by the defense intellectuals attending the 1964 conference. In Strategic Interaction, Goffman (1969: 136) changes the phrase to “full interdependence.”

  6. Balderston’s precise words were, “Can we get Erving to make a magnificent peroration and then have a discussion (Archibald 1966: 208)?

  7. Goffman gave Robert Jervis a prepublication copy of Strategic Interaction and Jervis keeps it in his Columbia University office with his other books by Goffman directly across from his desk. The author thanks Professor Jervis for showing me this and other books in his personal library.

References

  • Archibald, K. (Ed.). (1966). Strategic Interaction and Conflict: Original Papers and Discussion. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, K. (1968). The utilization of social research and policy analysis. Washington University: Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayson, R. (2004). Thomas Schelling and the Nuclear Age: Strategy as Social Science. New York: Frank Cass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, R. C. (1991). Jessie Bernard: The Making of a Feminist. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, A. (1953). Communication Pattern in Task-Oriented Groups. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics (pp. 443–506). Evanston, IL: Paterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1954). The Theory of Games of Strategy as a Modern Sociology of Conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 59, 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. (1992). Erving Goffman. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1981). Sociology Since Midcentury: Essays in Theory Cumulation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. (2017). The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, P., et al. (2013). How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, P. (2015). The World the Game Theorists Made. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. (1961). A Theory of Coalition Formation. American Sociological Review, 26, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. (1975). The strategy of social protest. New York: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. (2009). “Remembering Erving Goffman: A Stranger Determined to Remain One.” Bios Sociologicus: The Erving Goffman Archives, ed. by Dmitri N. Shalin (UNLV: CDC Publications, 2009).http://cdclv.unlv.edu/archives/interactionism/goffman/gamson_09.html. Accessed 7 Jan 2019

  • Goffman, E. (1952). On Cooling the Mark Out: Some Aspects of Adaptation to Failure. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 15(4), 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1955). On face work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes., 19(3), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, J. E. (1970). Letter to Miss Marilyn Sale (January 23). In Mike Keen Papers, Box 7, Folder 7. Special Collections Research Center: University of Chicago Library.

  • Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2015). The Social Thought of Erving Goffman. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, G. D. (2000). Erving Goffman: The Reluctant Apprentice. Symbolic Interaction, 23/3, 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, F. (1983). The Wizards of Armageddon. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M. (1999). Stalking the Sociological Imagination: J. Edgar Hoover's FBI Surveillance of American Sociology. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milnor, J. (1951). Games Against Nature. September 4. RM-679. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. and E. W. Burgess. (1969 [1921]). Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Roberts, S. (2017). “Morton Deutsch, Expert on Conflict Resolution, Dies at 97. The New York Times (March 21): B15.

  • Rapoport, A. (1960). Fights, Games and Debates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, M. (1970). Letter to J. Edgar Hoover (January 15). Mike Keen Papers, Box 7, Folder 7, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.

  • Schelling, T. C. (1958a). “The Reciprocal Fear of Surprise Attack.” P-1342. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1958b). The Strategy of Conflict: Prospectus for a Reorientation of Game Theory. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 203–264.

  • Schelling, T. C. (1980 [1960]). The strategy of conflict. Harvard: University of Harvard Press.

  • Schelling, T. (1991). April 30. Letter to Dr. Yves Winkin.

  • Schelling, T. (2015). Remembering Erving Goffman. Bios Sociologicus: The Erving Goffman Archives http://cdclv.unlv.edu/archives/interactionism/goffman/schelling_15.html. Accessed 3 Dec 2018

  • Swedberg, R. (2001). Sociology and Game Theory: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives. Theory and Society, 30, 301–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Q., Evan, W. M., & Deutsch, M. (Eds.). (1962). Preventing World War III: Some Proposals. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Yves Winkin and Paul Erickson for encouragement and counsel during formative stages of writing this paper. The author also thanks Robert Ayson for critical reading of the paper and Robert Jervis for sharing his remembrances of Schelling and Goffman during his years at UC Berkeley and Harvard. Material from the Mike Keen Papers is quoted with permission of the Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaworski, G.D. Erving Goffman as Sorcerer’s Apprentice. Am Soc 50, 387–401 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-09418-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-09418-z

Keywords

Navigation