Skip to main content
Log in

Five Ways to Improve Constructionist Craft in Social Problems Inquiries: Notes from an Apprenticeship

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

John Kitsuse’s views about the prospects for the constructionist analysis of social problems are distilled in summary form. As a mentor to the present author, Kitsuse expressed his appreciation for the continued growth and development of the tradition of sociological analysis that that he was instrumental in developing, while also believing that the perspective had been sidetracked in ways that were reminiscent of the morass that eventually undermined what was commonly called “labeling theory,” also known as the “societal reaction” perspective on deviance. Kitsuse’s positive vision for the constructionist tradition is framed in terms of the craft that imbues this mode of analysis with its vigor and perspicacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ibarra and Kitsuse (1993) has been widely taken as a statement about strict constructionism, but it was written as a call for investigating aspects of the social problem process that went beyond, or were independent of, “stages” and “cases” per se. Intending to hasten this work while moving on from objective-subjective questions, we argued for replacing the term “putative condition” with the term “condition-category” to indicate how the referents of claims-making activities are ultimately rooted in the systems of classification and categorization that are discussed in chapter one of CSP. Condition-categories, such as “roid rage” and “sexting,” are members’ terms (Emerson et al. 1995). They are constantly being invented, and hence provide perennial fodder for claims-making activities and the social problems process. “Putative” was ultimately too ambiguous for Kitsuse, in that it suggested the condition in question might or might not exist. Kitsuse was not interested in social problems as objective conditions at all, and he believed that investigating the social problems process did not entail independently taking a position on a putative condition’s factual existence.

  2. When teaching courses on deviance and social problems, Kitsuse assigned CW Mills’ famous (Mills 1943) article on “the professional ideology of social pathologists,” perhaps out of recognition of this impulse in his students.

  3. Kitsuse was aware of participatory action research and activist-oriented scholarship – indeed, the latter defines a core mission of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, for which he served as President in the early 1980s. Based on conversations with him, Kitsuse was not opposed in principle to activist-infused social problems analysis in a constructionist vein, so long as those undertaking such an approach carefully documented how they became involved with and shaped the process under study, through meticulous fieldnotes, for instance. First person documentation of claims-making activities would likely be of theoretical interest as well.

References

  • Bittner, E. (1967). The police on skid row: A study of peacekeeping. American Sociological Review, 32(5), 699–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A. V. (1968). The social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Rosso, J. (2011). The textual mediation of denial: Congress, Abu Ghraib, and the construction of an isolated incident. Social Problems, 58(2), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1987). Four ways to improve the craft of fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16(1), 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2012). Don’t argue with the members. The American Sociologist., 43, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, J. A. (2009). Defining deviance: John Kitsuse's modest agenda. The American Sociologist., 40(1/2), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2003). A constructionist analytics for social problems. in. J.a. Holstein and G. miller (Eds.), Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems (pp. 187–208). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, P. R., & Adorjan, M. (2018). Social constructionism. In J. A. Trevino (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook on social problems (pp. 279–300). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, P. R., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1993). Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: An interactionist proposal for the study of social problems. In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism: Debates in social problems theory (pp. 25–58). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, V. (1990). From sex as sin to sex as work: COYOTE and the reorganization of prostitution as a social problem. Social Problems, 37(3), 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, V. (1993). Making it work: The prostitutes’ rights movement in perspective. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2009). John Kitsuse: A sociologist in everyday life. The American Sociologist, 40, 36–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsuse, A. (2009). Friends along the way. The American Sociologist, 40, 15.20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsuse, J. I., & Cicourel, A. V. (1963). A note on the uses of official statistics. Social Problems, 11(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsuse, J. I., & Spector, M. (1975). Social problems and deviance: Some parallel issues. Social Problems, 22(5), 584–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loseke, D.R. 1992. The battered woman and shelters: The social construction of wife abuse . Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

  • Mills, C. W. (1943). The professional ideology of social pathologists. The American Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollner. (1978). Constitutive and mundane versions of labeling theory. Human Studies, 1(1), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rains, P. (1975). Imputations of deviance: A retrospective essay on the labeling perspective. Social Problems, 23(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J.W. 1985. Social problems theory: The constructionist view. In R. Turner (Ed.) Annual Review of Sociology (pp. 209–29). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 11, 229.

  • Spector, M. (2018). Constructing social problems: Forty years later. The American Sociologist. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9391-3.

  • Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977). Constructing social problems. Cummings: Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12(3), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems, 32(3), 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter R. Ibarra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibarra, P.R. Five Ways to Improve Constructionist Craft in Social Problems Inquiries: Notes from an Apprenticeship. Am Soc 50, 195–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9393-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9393-1

Keywords

Navigation