Inter-observer Variability in the Diagnosis of Proliferative Verrucous Leukoplakia: Clinical Implications for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Understanding: A Collaborative Pilot Study

Abstract

The use of diverse terminology may lead to inconsistent diagnosis and subsequent mistreatment of lesions within the proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL) spectrum. The objectives of this study were: (a) to measure inter-observer variability between a variety of pathologists diagnosing PVL lesions; and (b) to evaluate the impact of diverse terminologies on understanding, interpretation, and subsequent treatment planning by oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS). Six oral pathologists (OP) and six head and neck pathologists (HNP) reviewed 40 digitally scanned slides of PVL-type lesions. Inter-observer agreement on diagnoses was evaluated by Fleiss’ kappa analysis. The most commonly used diagnostic terminologies were sent to ten OMFS to evaluate their resulting interpretations and potential follow-up treatment approaches. The overall means of the surgeons’ responses were compared by Student t test. There was poor inter-observer agreement between pathologists on the diagnosis of PVL lesions (κ = 0.270), although there was good agreement (κ = 0.650) when diagnosing frankly malignant lesions. The lowest agreement was in diagnosing verrucous hyperplasia (VH) with/without dysplasia, atypical epithelial proliferation (AEP), and verrucous carcinoma (VC). The OMFS showed the lowest agreement on identical categories of non-malignant diagnoses, specifically VH and AEP. This study demonstrates a lack of standardized terminology and diagnostic criteria for the spectrum of PVL lesions. We recommend adopting standardized criteria and terminology, proposed and established by an expert panel white paper, to assist pathologists and clinicians in uniformly diagnosing and managing PVL spectrum lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Hansen LS, Olson JA, Silverman S Jr. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia. A long-term study of thirty patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;60:285–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bagan JV, Murillo J, Poveda R, Gavalda C, Jimenez Y, Scully C. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: unusual locations of oral squamous cell carcinomas, and field cancerization as shown by the appearance of multiple OSCCs. Oral Oncol. 2004;40:440–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Feller L, Wood NH, Raubenheimer EJ. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia and field cancerization: report of a case. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2006;8:67–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 1st ed. London: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shubhasini AR, Praveen BN, Hegde U, Uma K, Shubha G, Keerthi G, et al. Inter- and intra-observer variability in diagnosis of oral dysplasia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18:3251–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Krishnan L, Karpagaselvi K, Kumarswamy J, Sudheendra US, Santosh KV, Patil A. Inter- and intra-observer variability in three grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2016;20:261–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Geetha KM, Leeky M, Narayan TV, Sadhana S, Saleha J. Grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: points to ponder. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2015;19:198–204.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Manchanda A, Shetty DC. Reproducibility of grading systems in oral epithelial dysplasia. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e935–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kujan O, Khattab A, Oliver RJ, Roberts SA, Thakker N, Sloan P. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:224–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Abbey LM, Kaugars GE, Gunsolley JC, Burns JC, Page DG, Svirsky JA, et al. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability in the diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80:188–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Speight PM, Abram TJ, Floriano PN, James R, Vick J, Thornhill MH, et al. Interobserver agreement in dysplasia grading: toward an enhanced gold standard for clinical pathology trials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;120:474–82 e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fischer DJ, Epstein JB, Morton TH, Schwartz SM. Interobserver reliability in the histopathologic diagnosis of oral pre-malignant and malignant lesions. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004;33:65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Karabulut A, Reibel J, Therkildsen MH, Praetorius F, Nielsen HW, Dabelsteen E. Observer variability in the histologic assessment of oral premalignant lesions. J Oral Pathol Med. 1995;24:198–200.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    van der Meij EH, Reibel J, Slootweg PJ, van der Wal JE, de Jong WF, van der Waal I. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histologic assessment of oral lichen planus. J Oral Pathol Med. 1999;28:274–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cerero-Lapiedra R, Balade-Martinez D, Moreno-Lopez LA, Esparza-Gomez G, Bagan JV. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: a proposal for diagnostic criteria. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:e839–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Carrard VC, Brouns ER, van der Waal I. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia; a critical appraisal of the diagnostic criteria. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e411–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Garcia-Chias B, Casado-De La Cruz L, Esparza-Gomez GC, Cerero-Lapiedra R. Diagnostic criteria in proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: evaluation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:e335–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rosnah BZ, Thomas GK, Anand R, Jin K, Wm T, Takashi T, et al. Exophytic verrucous hyperplasia of the oral cavity—application of standardized criteria for diagnosis from a consensus report. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17:4491.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Villa A, Menon RS, Kerr AR, De Abreu Alves F, Guollo A, Ojeda D, et al. Proliferative leukoplakia: proposed new clinical diagnostic criteria. Oral Dis. 2018;24:749–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Muller S. Oral epithelial dysplasia, atypical verrucous lesions and oral potentially malignant disorders: focus on histopathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125:591–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pindborg JJ, Reibel J, Holmstrup P. Subjectivity in evaluating oral epithelial dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and initial carcinoma. J Oral Pathol. 1985;14:698–708.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Henson DE. Studies on observer variation. Should the rules be changed? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;115:991–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Al-Janabi S, Huisman A, Nap M, Clarijs R, van Diest PJ. Whole slide images as a platform for initial diagnostics in histopathology in a medium-sized routine laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:1107–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bauer TW, Schoenfield L, Slaw RJ, Yerian L, Sun Z, Henricks WH. Validation of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;137:518–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Indu M, Rathy R, Binu MP. “Slide less pathology”: fairy tale or reality? J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2016;20:284–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Drs. John Hardeman, University of Florida College of Dentistry; Andrew Salama, Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine; Bradley Szutz, Alaska Oral and Facial Cosmetic Surgery, Anchorage, AK; Michael McDermott, Midwest Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Omaha, NE; Ravi Chandran, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; George Kushner, University of Louisville School of Dentistry; Eric Fox, Oral Surgey Coral Springs, FL; Michael Langan, Central Florida Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery; Danielle Freburg-Hoffmeister, University of Florida College of Dentistry; and Carl Kimbler, Northern Plains Oral & Maxillofacial, Aberdeen, SD, for their participation in the oral and maxillofacial surgeon survey.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasbir D. Upadhyaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest as it relates to this research project.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this retrospective data analysis involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board, which did not require informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 89 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Upadhyaya, J.D., Fitzpatrick, S.G., Cohen, D.M. et al. Inter-observer Variability in the Diagnosis of Proliferative Verrucous Leukoplakia: Clinical Implications for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Understanding: A Collaborative Pilot Study. Head and Neck Pathol 14, 156–165 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-019-01035-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Inter-observer variability
  • Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia
  • Verrucous hyperplasia
  • Papillary squamous cell carcinoma
  • Atypical epithelial proliferation