Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate the benefits of resident and fellow-facilitated radiology–pathology head and neck conferences. A total of seven resident-facilitated and six fellow-facilitated head and neck radiology–pathology cases were presented as part of the radiology department conference series. The radiology residents were surveyed regarding the perceived quality and effectiveness of the fellow-facilitated sessions. The number of publications yielded from all the cases presented was tracked. Overall, the residents assessed the quality of the fellow-facilitated conferences with an average score of 3.9 out of 5 and the overall helpfulness with an average of 3.5 out of 5. The overall average level of resident understanding among the residents for the topics presented to them by the fellows at baseline was 2.5 out of 5 and 3.4 out of 5 after the presentations, which was a significant increase (p-value < 0.01). There were three peer-reviewed publications generated from the resident presentations and four peer-reviewed publications generated from the fellow presentations, which represents a 54% publication rate collectively. Therefore, trainee-facilitated head and neck radiology–pathology conferences at our institution provide added learning and scholarly activity opportunities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sorace J, Aberle DR, Elimam D, Lawvere S, Tawfik O, Wallace WD. Integrating pathology and radiology disciplines: an emerging opportunity? BMC Med. 2012;10:100.
Kelahan LC, Kalaria AD, Filice RW. PathBot: a radiology-pathology correlation dashboard. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30(6):681–6.
Al-Saraf A, Yassan L, Cipriani NA, Agrawal N, Chang P, Ginat DT. Desmoid-type fibromatosis of the tongue. Head Neck Pathol. 2016;10(4):527–9.
Ginat DT, Cipriani NA, Purakal A, Fitzpatrick C, Paral K, Krausz T, Pytel P. Disseminated malignant rhabdoid tumor of the head and neck. Head Neck Pathol. 2017;11(2):224–7.
Ginat DT, Johnson DN, Shogan A, Cipriani NA. Cervical chondrocutaneous branchial remnants. Head Neck Pathol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-017-0834-x.
Ginat DT, Schulte J, Portugal L, Cipriani NA. Laryngotracheal involvement in systemic light chain amyloidosis. Head Neck Pathol. 2018;12(1):127–30.
Cipriani NA, Blair EA, Finkle J, Kraninger JL, Straus CM, Villaflor VM, Ginat DT. Salivary gland secretory carcinoma with high-grade transformation, CDKN2A/B loss, distant metastasis, and lack of sustained response to crizotinib. Int J Surg Pathol. 2017;25(7):613–8.
Ginat D, Schulte J, Gooi Z, Cipriani N. High-grade conventional osteosarcoma of the mandible associated with P53 germline mutation. J Craniofac Surg. 2018.
Uraizee I, Cipriani NA, Ginat DT. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the oral cavity: radiology–pathology correlation. Head Neck Pathol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-017-0849-3.
Miller A, Rudland J, Hurrell M, Ali A. Rad-Path: integrated anatomical pathology and radiology undergraduate tutorials. Pathology. 2009;41(5):460–6.
Jafri NF, Nadgir R, Slanetz PJ. Student-facilitated radiology-pathology correlation conferences: an experiential educational tool to teach multidisciplinary patient care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(7):512–6.
Wise SW, Mauger DT, Matthews AE, Hartman DS. Impact of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Radiologic Pathology Course on radiology resident performance on the ACR In-training and ABR written examinations. Acad Radiol. 2000;7(9):693–9.
Rubin DL, Desser TS. A data warehouse for integrating radiologic and pathologic data. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5(3):210–7.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for support received from the University of Chicago Office of Faculty Affairs through the Faculty Initiatives Fund for our Head and Neck Radiology–Pathology Trainee Conference, during which this case was presented.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have potential conflicts of interest.
Appendix: Survey template
Appendix: Survey template
What is your current year in radiology residency?
-
1.
First
-
2.
Second
-
3.
Third
-
4.
Fourth
Have you had prior exposure to head and neck radiology-pathology sessions before this conference series, including here or at AIRP?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
How would you rate the quality of the XX* head and neck radiology-pathology conference?
-
1.
Poor
-
2.
Fair
-
3.
Good
-
4.
Very good
-
5.
Excellent
How would you rate your understanding of XX* head and neck radiology-pathology material before this conference?
-
1.
Not at all familiar
-
2.
Slightly familiar
-
3.
Somewhat familiar
-
4.
Moderately familiar
-
5.
Extremely familiar
How would you rate your understanding of XX* head and neck radiology-pathology material after this conference?
-
1.
Not at all familiar
-
2.
Slightly familiar
-
3.
Somewhat familiar
-
4.
Moderately familiar
-
5.
Extremely familiar
How helpful did you find the XX* head and neck radiology-pathology session?
-
1.
Not at all helpful
-
2.
Slightly helpful
-
3.
Somewhat helpful
-
4.
Very helpful
-
5.
Extremely helpful
How important do you believe exposure to head and neck radiology-pathology as part of your general radiology education?
-
1.
Not at all helpful
-
2.
Slightly helpful
-
3.
Somewhat helpful
-
4.
Very helpful
-
5.
Extremely helpful
How important do you believe exposure to head and neck radiology-pathology as part of your future career?
-
1.
Extremely important
-
2.
Very important
-
3.
Somewhat important
-
4.
Slightly important
-
5.
Not at all important
Do you plan on pursuing a career in neuroradiology/head and neck imaging?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
3.
Undecided
*XX corresponds to the topic of each conference.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ginat, D.T., Cipriani, N.A. & Christoforidis, G. Educational Impact of Trainee-Facilitated Head and Neck Radiology–Pathology Correlation Conferences. Head and Neck Pathol 13, 177–181 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-018-0929-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-018-0929-z