Unusual Multinucleated Giant Cell Reaction in a Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Features

  • Celeste Sánchez-Romero
  • Roman Carlos
  • Ciro Dantas Soares
  • Oslei Paes de Almeida
Case Report

Abstract

Multinucleated giant cell (MGC) reaction in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) usually represents a stromal foreign body reaction to keratin from neoplastic epithelial cells. We describe and illustrate by double immunohistochemistry a case of a tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in a 70-year-old female patient, with a copious MGC reaction not associated to keratin, showing a histopathological pattern not described before. The MGCs were directly associated with neoplastic cells, which are phagocytosed by the MGCs. Immunohistochemistry for CD68, AE1/AE3, CD163, CD11c, RANK, RANK-L, OPG were performed, as well as double staining for CD68 and AE1/AE3 to better illustrate the relationship between MGCs and neoplastic cells. The clinical and biological significance of this pattern of MGC reaction in OSCC needs to be better elucidated.

Keywords

Oral squamous cell carcinoma Multinucleated giant cells Immunohistochemistry Phagocytosis 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All of authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest and no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    De Wever O, Mareel M. Role of tissue stroma in cancer cell invasion. J Pathol. 2003;200(4):429–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Visser KE, Coussens LM. The inflammatory tumor microenvironment and its impact on cancer development. Contrib Microbiol. 2006;13:118–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Essa AA, Yamazaki M, Maruyama S, Abé T, Babkair H, Raghib AM, et al. Tumour-associated macrophages are recruited and differentiated in the neoplastic stroma of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Pathology 2016;48(3):219–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ma J, Liu L, Che G, Yu N, Dai F, You Z. The M1 form of tumor-associated macrophages in non-small cell lung cancer is positively associated with survival time. BMC Cancer 2010;10:112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laoui D, Movahedi K, Van Overmeire E, Van den Bossche J, Schouppe E, et al. Tumor-associated macrophages in breast cancer: distinct subsets, distinct functions. Int J Dev Biol. 2011;55(7–9):861–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Falleni M, Savi F, Tosi D, Agape E, Cerri A, Moneghini L, et al. M1 and M2 macrophages’ clinicopathological significance in cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res 2017;27(3):200–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu JM, Liu K, Liu JH, Jiang XL, Wang XL, Chen YZ, et al. CD163 as a marker of M2 macrophage, contribute to predicte aggressiveness and prognosis of Kazakh esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017;8(13):21526–38.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burkhardt A, Höltje WJ. The effects of intra-arterial bleomycin therapy on squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Biopsy and autopsy examinations. J Maxillofac Surg. 1975;3(4):217–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helming L, Gordon S. The molecular basis of macrophage fusion. Immunobiology. 2007;212(9–10):785–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brooks E, Simmons-Arnold L, Naud S, Evans MF, Elhosseiny A. Multinucleated giant cells’ incidence, immune markers, and significance: a study of 172 cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3:95–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patil S, Rao RS, Ganavi BS. A foreigner in squamous cell carcinoma! J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(5):147–50.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Santos HB, Miguel MC, Pinto LP, Gordón-Núñez MA, Alves PM, Nonaka CF. Multinucleated giant cell reaction in lower lip squamous cell carcinoma: a clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;46:773–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reid MD, Muraki T, HooKim K, Memis B, Graham RP, Allende D, et al. Cytologic features and clinical implications of undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells of the pancreas: an analysis of 15 cases. Cancer. 2017;125:563–75.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weber M, Iliopoulos C, Moebius P, Büttner-Herold M, Amann K, Ries J, Preidl R, et al. Prognostic significance of macrophage polarization in early stage oral squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2016;52:75–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petruzzi MN, Cherubini K, Salum FG, de Figueiredo MA. Role of tumour-associated macrophages in oral squamous cells carcinoma progression: an update on current knowledge. Diagn Pathol. 2017;12(1):32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brandwein-Gensler M, Teixeira MS, Lewis CM, Lee B, Rolnitzky L, Hille JJ, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(2):167–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Essa AA, Yamazaki M, Maruyama S, Abé T, Babkair H, Cheng J, et al. Keratin pearl degradation in oral squamous cell carcinoma: reciprocal roles of neutrophils and macrophages. J Oral Pathol Med. 2014;43(10):778–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Emanuel PO, Shim H, Phelps RG. Poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with osteoclastic giant-cell-like proliferation. J Cutan Pathol. 2007;34:930–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sica A, Larghi P, Mancino A, Rubino L, Porta C, Totaro MG, et al. Macrophage polarization in tumour progression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008;18(5):349–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Won KY, Kalil RK, Kim YW, Park YK. RANK signalling in bone lesions with osteoclast-like giant cells. Pathology. 2011;43(4):318–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor RM, Kashima TG, Hemingway FK, Dongre A, Knowles HJ, Athanasou NA. CD14- mononuclear stromal cells support (CD14+) monocyte-osteoclast differentiation in aneurysmal bone cyst. Lab Invest. 2012;92(4):600–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Branstetter D, Rohrbach K, Huang LY, Soriano R, Tometsko M, Blake M, et al. RANK and RANK ligand expression in primary human osteosarcoma. J Bone Oncol. 2015;4(3):59–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khan UA, Hashimi SM, Khan S, Quan J, Bakr MM, Forwood MR, et al. Differential expression of chemokines, chemokine receptors and proteinases by foreign body giant cells (FBGCs) and osteoclasts. J Cell Biochem. 2014;115(7):1290–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chuang FH, Hsue SS, Wu CW, Chen YK. Immunohistochemical expression of RANKL, RANK, and OPG in human oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009;38(10):753–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang X, Junior CR, Liu M, Li F, D’Silva NJ, Kirkwood KL. Oral squamous carcinoma cells secrete RANKL directly supporting osteolytic bone loss. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(2):119–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oral Pathology Section, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental SchoolUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP)PiracicabaBrazil
  2. 2.Centro Clínico de Cabeza y Cuello/Hospital Herrera LlerandiGuatemalaGuatemala

Personalised recommendations