Reaching Out versus Lashing Out: Examining Gender Differences in Experiences with and Responses to Bullying in High School
The present study examines gender differences in bullying in high school. Unique contributions include comparisons of both victimization and perpetration rates across four subtypes of bullying: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Further, as we conceptualize bullying within the larger framework of literature on social rejection, we also address whether there are gender differences in experiencing social rejection–in the form of bullying–and responding with aggression, as opposed to asocial or prosocial behavior. The literature yields mixed findings across these three questions (i.e., gender differences in experiences with victimization and perpetration and responses to those experiences), suggesting sample variations (Archer Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322, 2004; Archer & Coyne Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230, 2005; Card, Stucky, Sawalani, & Little Child Development, 79, 1185–1229, 2008). Thus, we explored experiential differences in our sample, and hypothesized based on the tend and befriend model (Taylor et al., 2000) that girls would be more likely than boys to respond to bullying with prosocial behaviors. With regard to victimization and perpetration differences, we found that male students both experienced and perpetrated significantly more physical bullying. Boys were also significantly more likely to report experiencing verbal bullying than girls. No significant differences emerged for relational or cyber bullying. With regard to responses, social withdrawal was more common than aggressive responding, but consistent with the tend and befriend model, girls chose prosocial responses significantly more than boys, whereas boys were just as likely to choose antisocial responding as prosocial responding. These results suggest that gender should be considered in studies addressing the question of when experiences with rejection–in its many forms–results in antisocial versus prosocial behavior.
KeywordsSchool safety Bullying Aggression Rejection Gender differences
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The project is funded by the National Institute of Justice School Safety Initiative and can be found on the Open Science Framework at www.osf.io/fyvxp. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
- Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis (Vol. 135). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Beyond Bullies. (2016). #Beyond bullies stand up campaign. http://beyondbullies.org/take-action-now/sticker-campaign/
- Blackhart, G. C., Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2006). Rejection’s impact on self- defeating, prosocial, antisocial, and self-regulatory behaviors. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 237–253). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cyber Mentors. (2016). Cyberbullying. http://cybermentors.org.uk/?s=cyberbullying
- Feng, C., Lori, A., Waldman, I. D., Binder, E. B., Haroon, E., & Rilling, J. K. (2015). A common oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism modulates intranasal oxytocin effects on the neural response to social cooperation in humans. Genes, Brain, and Behavior, 14, 516–525. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Graham, T., & Ickes, W. (1997). When women’s intuition isn’t greater than men’s. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 117–143). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hamburger, M. E., Basile, K. C., & Vivolo, A. M. (2011). Measuring bullying victimization perpetration, and bystander experiences: A compendium of assessment tools. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- Harris, M. J. (2009). Taking bullying and rejection (inter)personally: Benefits of a social psychological approach to peer victimization. In M. J. Harris (Ed.), Bullying, rejection, and peer victimization: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 3–24). New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
- I Witness Bullying. (2016). #I am a witness. http://iwitnessbullying.org/
- Kelly, E. V., Newton, N. C., Stapinski, L. A., Slade, T., Barrett, E. L., Conrod, P. J., & Teeson, M. (2015). Suicidality, internalizing problems, and externalizing problems among adolescent bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Preventive Medicine: An international journal devoted to practice and theory, 73, 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klein, J. (2005). Teaching her a lesson: Media misses boys’ rage relating to girls in school shootings. Crime, Media, Culture, 1, 90–97. doi: 10.1177/1741659005050245.
- Leadbetter, B., Woods, T., Yeung, R., Riel, K., & Lynch, R. A. (2011). Using your WITS to prevent peer victimization: A resource guide to the WITS primary and WITS LEADS programs (2nd ed.). Victoria: University of Victoria and Rock Solid Foundation.Google Scholar
- Leary, M. R., Koch, E., & Hechenbleikner, N. (2001). Emotional responses to interpersonal rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 146–166). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Leff, S. S., Waasdorp, T. E., Paskewich, B., Gullan, R. L., Jawad, A. F., MacEvoy, J. P., Feinberg, B. E., & Power, T. J. (2010). The preventing relational aggression in schools everyday program: A preliminary evaluation of acceptability and impact. School Psychology Review, 39, 569–587.Google Scholar
- Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., Freiburger, T. L., & Ricketts, M. L. (2012). Battle of the sexes: An examination of male and female cyber bullying. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 6(1), 904–911.Google Scholar
- McMahon, R. J., & Frick, P. J. (2009). Conduct and oppositional disorders. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Assessment of childhood disorders (4th ed., pp. 132–183). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- National Campaign for Public School Improvement. (2016). Project Appleseed. http://www.projectappleseed.org/secret-service-safe-school-initiative
- National Education Association. (2015). NEA’s bully free: It starts with me. http://www.nea.org/home/neabullyfree.html
- Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..Google Scholar
- Ophelia Project. (2013). Creating a safe school. http://www.opheliaproject.org/cass/ProgramManager.pdf
- Paley, V. G. (1993). You can’t say you can’t play. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Reijntjes, A., Thomaes, S., Kamphuis, J. H., Bushman, B. J., de Castro, B. O., & Telch, M. J. (2011). Explaining the paradoxical rejection-aggression link: The mediating effects of hostile intent attributions, anger, and decreases in state self-esteem on peer rejection-induced aggression in youth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 955–963. doi: 10.1177/0146167211410247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender and Society, 23(2), 145-160. doi: 10.1177/0891243208330313.
- Robers, S., Kemp, J., Rathbun, A., & Morgan, R. E. (2014). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2013. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- Sincek, D. (2014, September). Gender differences in cyber-bullying. Paper presented at international multidisciplinary scientific conference on social sciences and arts, Albena, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. H., Barkley, R. A., & Shapiro, C. J. (2009). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Assessment of childhood disorders (4th ed., pp. 53–131). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Smokowski, P. R., Evans, C. B. R., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). The differential impacts of episodic, chronic, and cumulative physical bullying and cyberbullying: The effects of victimization on the school experiences, social support, and mental health of rural adolescents. Violence and Victims, 29, 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sommer, F., Leuschner, V., & Scheithauer, H. (2014). Bullying, romantic rejection, and conflicts with teachers: The crucial role of social dynamics in the development of school shootings–A systematic review. International Journal of Developmental Science, 8, 3–24.Google Scholar
- Stomp Out Bullying. (2016). #STOMP out bullying. http://www.stompoutbullying.org/.
- Tumblr. (2015). #Post it forward. http://postitforward.tumblr.com/.
- Underwood, M. K. (2002). Sticks and stones and social exclusion: Aggression among girls and boys. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 533–548). Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Vaillancourt, T., Clinton, J., McDougall, P., Schmidt, L. A., & Hymel, S. (2010). The neurobiology of peer victimization and rejection. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 293–304). Florence: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Vossekuil, B., Reddy, M., Fein, R., Borum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2000). U.S.S.S. safe school initiative: Am interim report on the prevention of targeted violence in schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Secret Service, National Threat Assessment Center.Google Scholar
- Waller, R., Corral-Frías, N. S., Vannucci, B., Bogdan, R., Knodt, A. R., Hariri, A. R., & Hyde, L. W. (2016). An oxytocin receptor polymorphism predicts amygdala reactivity in antisocial behavior in men. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 1218–1226. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams, K. D. (1997). Social ostracism. In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors, The Springer Series in Social/Clinical Psychology (pp. 133-170). US: Springer.Google Scholar
- Williams, K. D., & Zadro, L. (2001). Ostracism: On being ignored, excluded, and rejected. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 21–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar