Advertisement

American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 389–400 | Cite as

Treating Dually Diagnosed Offenders in Rural Settings: Profile of the Middle Tennessee Rural Reentry Program

Article

Abstract

There has been a proliferation of offender reentry programs since the passage of the Second Chance Act in 2008, including an unprecedented expansion of treatment services into underserved rural areas. Review of Second Chance Act programming and observation of unmet mental health and substance abuse needs in justice settings contextualizes description of the Middle Tennessee Rural Reentry Program, a U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance funded intervention. The program targeted 209 adult female and male higher risk offenders that were dually diagnosed with mental health and substance abuse disorders for evidence based cognitive behavioral change oriented therapeutic treatment. While offender outcome indicators (recidivism and relapse) suggested program impact, barriers to implementing, delivering, and evaluating reentry programming in rural areas were also identified and orient discussion around evidence based demonstration and replication.

Keywords

Reentry Jail reentry Rural reentry Rehabilitation 

References

  1. Barnes, J. C., Miller, J. M., Miller, H. V., & Gibson, C. (2008). Juvenile drug court program admission, demeanor and cherry-picking: A research note. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). National vital statistics system, mortality file, 2015. Atlanta, GA: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Council of State Governments (2013). Second chance act. Washington, DC: Author. Available online http://csgjusticecenter.org/nrrc/projects/second-chance-act/.Google Scholar
  4. Crocker, A. G., Nicholls, T. L., Seto, M. C., Roy, L., Leclair, M. C., Brink, J., & Côté, G. (2015). Research priorities in mental health, justice, and safety: A multidisciplinary stakeholder report. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 14(3), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finn, P. (1999). Job placement for offenders: A promising approach to reducing recidivism and correctional costs. National Institute of Justice Journal, 1–35.Google Scholar
  6. Fox, C., & Albertson, K. (2012). Is payment by results the most efficient way to address the challenges faced by the criminal justice sector? Probation Journal, 59(4), 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hastings, S. L., & Cohn, T. J. (2013). Challenges and opportunities associated with rural mental health practice. Journal of Rural Mental Health, 37(1), 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Latessa, E. (2011). Why the risk and needs principles are relevant to correctional programs (even to employment programs). Criminology & Public Policy, 10(4), 973–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lurigio, A. J., Rollins, A., & Fallon, J. (2004). Effects of serious mental illness on offender reentry. Federal Probation, 68, 45.Google Scholar
  10. Lynch, J. P., Miller, J.M., Miller, H.V., Heindel, T.L., & Wood, A. (2012). Embracing evidence based practices. American Jails. (September/October).Google Scholar
  11. Miller, J. M. (2012). The rise of the evidence based practices movement and new opportunities for criminal justice research. ACJS TODAY, 37(1).Google Scholar
  12. Miller, J. M. (2014). Identifying collateral effects of offender reentry programming through evaluative fieldwork. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller, J. M., & Khey, D. N. (2016). An implementation and process evaluation of the Louisiana 22nd judicial district’s behavioral health court. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(1), 124–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, H. V., & Miller, J. M. (2010). Community in-reach through jail reentry: Findings from a quasi-experimental design. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller, H. V., & Miller, J. M. (2015a). A promising jail reentry program revisited: Results from a quasi-experimental design. Criminal Justice Studies, 28(2), 211–225.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, J. M., & Miller, H. V. (2015b). Rethinking program fidelity for criminal justice. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller, J. M., & Miller, H. V. (2016). Validating program fidelity: Lessons from the delaware county second chance initiatives. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(1), 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller, J. M., & Shutt, J. E. (2001). Considering the need for empirically grounded drug court screening mechanisms. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller, H. V., Tillyer, R., & Miller, J. M. (2012). Recognizing the need for prisoner input in correctional research: Observations from the Texas In-Prison DWI reduction program. The Prison Journal, 92(2).Google Scholar
  20. Miller, H. V., Miller, J. M., & Barnes, J. C. (2016). Reentry programming for opioid and opiate involved female offenders: Findings from a mixed methods evaluation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2006). Treatment for drug abusers in the criminal justice system. In NIDA Info Facts. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  22. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2012a). Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations: A research-based guide (Revised ed.). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  23. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2012b). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide (3rd ed.). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  24. O'Hear, M. M. (2007). The second chance act and the future of reentry reform. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 20(2), 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pogorzelski, W., Wolff, N., Pan, K. Y., & Blitz, C. L. (2005). Behavioral health problems, ex-offender reentry policies, and the “Second Chance Act”. American Journal of Public Health, 95(10), 1718–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saylor, W. G., & Gaes, G. G. (1992). The post-release employment project: Prison work has measurable effects on post-release success. Federal Prisons Journal, 2(4), 33–36.Google Scholar
  27. Saylor, W. G., & Gaes, G. G. (1997). Training inmates through industrial work participation and vocational apprenticeship instruction. Corrections Management Quarterly, 1(2), 32–43.Google Scholar
  28. Seiter, R. P., & Kadela, K. R. (2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime and Delinquency, 49, 360–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steadman, H. J., Callahan, L., Robbins, P. C., Vesselinov, R., McGuire, T. G., & Morrissey, J. P. (2014). Criminal justice and behavioral health care costs of mental health court participants: A six-year study. Psychiatric Services.Google Scholar
  30. Turner, S., & Petersilia, J. (1996). Work release in Washington: Effects on recidivism and corrections costs. The Prison Journal, 76(2), 138–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ward, K. C., & Merlo, A. V. (2016). Rural jail reentry and mental health identifying challenges for offenders and professionals. The Prison Journal, 96, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology & Criminal JusticeUniversity of North FloridaJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations