Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Active study: undetected prevalence and clinical inertia in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP)

  • Brief Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

To prove if there is clinical inertia in the identification and treatment of episodes of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP), comparing actual results from clinical practice with clinical oncologists’ prior perception.

Design

Observational and descriptive study, using information collected by practising medical oncologists, at three moments: (a) questionnaire regarding their professional judgement of the handling of patients with BTcP in their practice, (b) cross-sectional clinical screening, to detect possible existing cases of BTcP in a representative sample of their patients, (c) retrospective self-audit of clinical case histories of patients diagnosed with BTcP to find out about how it has been handled.

Participants and study period

A random sample on a state level of 108 specialists in medical oncology. 540 patients who suffer some type of cancer pain on the designated study date for each specialist (July–December 2016).

Results

The global prevalence of BTcP in the study sample covered 91.3% of the patients who were suffering some type of cancer pain. Barely 2% of the doctors surveyed suspected figures around this mark. 40.9% of the cases had not been previously detected as BTcP by their doctors. Although 90% of the patients who had previously been diagnosed with BTcP received a specific analgesic treatment for the symptoms, 42% of those patients with known BTcP were not able to control their episodes of pain.

Conclusions

Clinical inertia is a serious problem in the handling of BTcP in medical oncology services, where it is the subject of a significantly low level of detection and treatment, despite the contrasting perception of specialists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Breivik H, et al. Cancer-related pain: a pan-European survey of prevalence, treatment and patient attitudes. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1420–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gómez-Batiste J, et al. Breakthrough cancer pain: prevalence and characteristics in patients in Catalonia, Spain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;24:45–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Portenoy RK, Payne D, Jacobsen P. Breakthrough pain: characteristics and impact in patients with cancer pain. Pain. 1999;81(129–34):3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caraceni A, Martini C, Zecca E, Portenoy RK, Ashby MA, Hawson G, et al. Breakthrough pain characteristics and síndromes in patients with cancer pain. An international survey. Palliat Med. 2004;18:177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mercadante S, Zagonel V, Breda E, Arcara C, Gebbia V, Porzio G, et al. Breakthrough pain in oncology: a longitudinal study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;40:183–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Porta-Sales J, Garzon Rodriguez C, Julia Torras J, Casals Merchan M. Cancer-related breakthrough pain. Med Clin (Barc). 2010;135:280–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mercadante S, Radbruch L, Caraceni A, Cherny N, Kaasa S, Nauck F, et al. Episodic (breakthrough) pain: consensus conference of an expert working group of the European Association for Palliative Care. Cancer. 2002;94:832–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Connor PJ, et al. Advances in patient safety, vol. 2; 2005. pp. 293–308.

  9. Zeppetella G. Succesful management of breakthrough cáncer pain. London: Evolving Medicine Ltd; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davies AN, Dickman A, Reid C, Stevens AM, Zeppetella G. The management of cancer-related breakthrough pain: recommendations of a task group of the Science Committee of the Association for Palliative Medicine of Great Britain and Ireland. Eur J Pain. 2009;13:331–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bennett D, Burton AW, Fishman S, Fortner B, McCarberg B, Miaskowski C, et al. Consensus panel recommendations for the assessment and management of breakthrough pain. Part 1. Assessment. Pharm Ther. 2005;30:296–301.

  12. Bennett D, Burton AW, Fishman S, Fortner B, McCarberg B, Miaskowski C, et al. Consensus panel recommendations for the assessment and management of breakthrough pain. Part 2. Management. Pharm Ther. 2005;30:354–61.

  13. Mercadante S. The use of rapid onset opioids for breakthrough cancer pain: the challenge of its dosing. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;80:460–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Escobar Y, Biete i Solà A, Camba M, Gálvez R, Mañas A, Rodríguez CA Sánchez, Rodríguez D y Tuca i Rodríguez A. Diagnóstico y tratamiento del dolor irruptivo oncológico: recomendaciones de consenso. Med Paliat. 2013;20(4):150–7.

  15. Branch ET, Higgins S. Inercia clínica: la dificultad de superarla. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63:1399–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips LS, Branch WT, Cook CB, Doyle JP, El-Kebbi IM, Gallina DL, et al. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001;35:825–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivera F. Primer Plan de Futuro de la Oncología Médica. Madrid. Sociedad Española de Educación Médica, 2015. Disponible en [http://www.seom.org/ultimas-noticias/105218-primer-plan-de-futuro-de-la-oncologia-medica].

  18. Pascual López A. Dolor irruptivo: perspectivas en cuidados paliativos. Sesiones Destacadas. V Congreso de la Sociedad Española del Dolor (Salamanca, 9–12 octubre 2002).

  19. Zeppetella G, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of breakthrough pain in cancer patients admitted to a hospice. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;20:87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zeppetella G. Breakthrough pain. In: Oxford textbook of palliative medicine, 4th edn, pp. 654–661 (2010).

  21. Portenoy RK, Hagen NA. Breakthrough pain: definition, prevalence and characteristics. Pain. 1990;41:273–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Active study is a scientific initiative by the Foundation to further the Excellence and Quality of Oncology (ECO in Spanish) and the Francisco de Vitoria University in Madrid. The authors thank all of the medical oncologists who took part in the survey for their contribution to the study.

Funding

This study was funded by Kyowa Kirin Farmacéutica S.L.U., through the ECO Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Camps Herrero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was realized in agreement by the ethical requirements of the declaration of Helsinki, review of Scotland (October, 2000) for the investigation by human beings.

Informed consent

All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camps Herrero, C., Reina Zoilo, J.J., Monge Martín, D. et al. Active study: undetected prevalence and clinical inertia in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). Clin Transl Oncol 21, 380–390 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-018-1925-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-018-1925-1

Keywords

Navigation