Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bioelectrogenesis from Raw Algal Biomass Through Microbial Fuel Cells: Effect of Acetate as Co-substrate

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Algae are autotrophic organisms that are widespread in water bodies. Increased pollution in water bodies leads to eutrophication. However, algae growing in lakes undergoing eutrophication could be utilized towards the generation of added-value bio-electricity using microbial fuel cells (MFCs). In the present study, two methods of electricity generation using raw algae (RA) and RA + acetate (AC) as co-substrate were analyzed in single chamber air cathode MFCs. MFCs supplemented with RA and RA + AC clearly showed higher power density, greater current generation, and improved COD (chemical oxygen demand) removal, which demonstrated the feasibility of using AC as substrate for MFC. The MFC–RA + AC (0.48 mA) generated 28% higher current relative to that generated by MFC with RA alone. Notably, the maximum power densities generated by MFC–RA and MFC–RA + AC were 230 and 410 mW/m2, respectively. MFC–RA and MFC–RA + AC exhibited TCOD (total chemical oxygen reduction) removal values of 77% and 86.6%, respectively. Despite the high influent TCOD (758 mg/l) concentration, the MFC–RA + AC exhibited an 8.5% higher COD removal relative to that of MFC–RA (525 mg/l). Our current findings demonstrated effective energy generation using algae biomass with a co-substrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh RK, Singh R, Sivakumar D, Kondaveeti S, Kim T, Li J, Sung BH, Cho BK, Dr Kim, Kim SC, Kalia VC, Zhang YHPJ, Zhao H, Kang YC, Lee J-K (2018) Insights into cell-free conversion of CO2 to chemicals by a multienzyme cascade reaction. ACS Catal. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b02646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kondaveeti S, Moon JM, Min B (2017) Optimum spacing between electrodes in an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell with a low-cost polypropylene separator. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 40:1851–1858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1838-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim M, Hyun MS, Gadd GM, Kim GT, Lee SJ, Kim HJ (2009) Membrane-electrode assembly enhances performance of a microbial fuel cell type biological oxygen demand sensor. Environ Technol 30:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330902732077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pandey P, Shinde VN, Deopurkar RL, Kale SP, Patil SA, Pant D (2016) Recent advances in the use of different substrates in microbial fuel cells toward wastewater treatment and simultaneous energy recovery. Appl Energy 168:706–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kondaveeti S, Mohanakrishna G, Lee J-K, Kalia VC (2018) Methane as a substrate for energy generation using microbial fuel cells. Indian J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-018-0765-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Venkata Mohan S, Mohanakrishna G, Reddy BP, Saravanan R, Sarma PN (2008) Bioelectricity generation from chemical wastewater treatment in mediatorless (anode) microbial fuel cell (MFC) using selectively enriched hydrogen producing mixed culture under acidophilic microenvironment. Biochem Eng J 39:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.08.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohanakrishna G, Vanbroekhoven K, Pant D (2016) Imperative role of applied potential and inorganic carbon source on acetate production through microbial electrosynthesis. J CO2 Util 15:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2016.03.003

  8. Kondaveeti S, Choi K, Kakarla R, Min B (2014) Microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus as renewable biomass feedstock for electricity generation in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Front Environ Sci Eng 8:784–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0590-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bringmann G, Kühn R (1980) Comparison of the toxicity thresholds of water pollutants to bacteria, algae, and protozoa in the cell multiplication inhibition test. Water Res 14:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90093-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Velasquez-Orta SB, Curtis TP, Logan BE (2009) Energy from algae using microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rashid N, Cui Y-F, Saif Ur Rehman M, Han J-I (2013) Enhanced electricity generation by using algae biomass and activated sludge in microbial fuel cell. Sci Total Environ 457:91–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang H, Lu L, Cui F, Liu D, Zhao Z, Xu Y (2012) Simultaneous bioelectrochemical degradation of algae sludge and energy recovery in microbial fuel cells. RSC Adv 2:7228–7234. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra20631e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kakarla R, Kim JR, Jeon B-H, Min B (2015) Enhanced performance of an air–cathode microbial fuel cell with oxygen supply from an externally connected algal bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 195:210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kondaveeti S, Kakarla R, Kim HS, Kim B-G, Min B (2017) The performance and long-term stability of low-cost separators in single-chamber bottle-type microbial fuel cells. Environ Technol 39:288–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1299223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  16. Logan BE (2008) Microbial fuel cells. Wiley, Hobokem

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohanakrishna G, Abu-Reesh IM, Kondaveeti S, Al-Raoush RI, He Z (2018) Enhanced treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater by short-term applied voltage in single chamber microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 253:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Venkata Mohan S, Mohanakrishna G, Velvizhi G, Babu VL, Sarma PN (2010) Bio-catalyzed electrochemical treatment of real field dairy wastewater with simultaneous power generation. Biochem Eng J 51:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2010.04.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang S, Huang L, Gan L, Quan X, Li N, Chen G, Lu L, Xing D, Yang F (2012) Combined effects of enrichment procedure and non-fermentable or fermentable co-substrate on performance and bacterial community for pentachlorophenol degradation in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 120:120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei J, Liang P, Huang X (2011) Recent progress in electrodes for microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 102:9335–9344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chandrasekhar K, Venkata Mohan S (2012) Bio-electrochemical remediation of real field petroleum sludge as an electron donor with simultaneous power generation facilitates biotransformation of PAH: effect of substrate concentration. Bioresour Technol 110:517–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel SKS, Kondaveeti S, Otari SV, Pagolu RT, Jeong SH, Kim SC, Cho B-K, Kang YC, Lee J-K (2018) Repeated batch methanol production from a simulated biogas mixture using immobilized Methylocystis bryophila. Energy 145:477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel SKS, Choi SH, Kang YC, Lee J-K (2017) Eco-friendly composite of Fe3O4– reduced graphene oxide particles for efficient enzyme immobilization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:2213–2222. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b05165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2018H1D3A2001746, 2015R1D1A1A01061279, 2013M3A6A8073184). This research was supported by 2017 KU Brain Pool of Konkuk University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Vipin C. Kalia or Jung-Kul Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kondaveeti, S., Mohanakrishna, G., Pagolu, R. et al. Bioelectrogenesis from Raw Algal Biomass Through Microbial Fuel Cells: Effect of Acetate as Co-substrate. Indian J Microbiol 59, 22–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-018-0769-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-018-0769-2

Keywords

Navigation