Theoretical Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Models for alarm call behaviour

  • Luciana Mafalda Elias de Assis
  • Raul Abreu de Assis
  • Moiseis Cecconello
  • Ezio Venturino
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

The evolution of alarm call behaviour under individual selection is studied. Four mathematical models of increasing complexity are proposed and analysed. Theoretical conditions for the evolution of “selfish”, “mutualistic”, “altruistic” or “spiteful” alarm calls are established. The models indicate that the hypotheses of benefits of retaining group members or avoiding group detection are not sufficient to explain the evolution of alarm call behaviour, but serve as a complementary factor to facilitate its evolution in most cases. It is hypothesized that the evolution of alarm calls between non-kin should evolve probably when calls are mutualistic, mildly altruistic and there are beneficial group size effects against predation.

Keywords

Alarm call Evolution Model Differential equations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Luciana Mafalda Elias de Assis acknowledges the support of UNEMAT. Raul Abreu de Assis acknowledges the support of CNPQ, grant 203654/2014-5 and the support of FAPEMAT, Edital Universal 005-2015, process number, 204271/2015. Moiseis Cecconello acknowledges the support of CNPQ, grant 200446/2015-0 and Ezio Venturino acknowledges the partial support of the program “Metodi numerici nelle scienze applicate” of the Dipartimento di Matematica “Giuseppe Peano”.

The authors thank the referees for their contributions for the improvement of this paper.

References

  1. Bednekoff PA (2005) Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game. Am Nat 150:373–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown CH (1986) Ventroloquial and locatable vocalization in birds. Z Tierpsychol 65:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnov EL, Krebs JR (1975) The evolution of alarm calls: altruism or manipulation? Am Nat 109:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clutton-Brock TH, O’Riain MJ, Brotherton PNM, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Griffin AS, Manser M (1999) Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science 284:1640–1644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cresswell W (1994) The function of alarm calls in redshanks, Tringa totanus. Anim Behav 47:736–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Edelstein-Keshet L (1988) Mathematical models in biology. McGraw-Hill Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster WA, Treherne JE (1981) Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 293:466–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior. J Theor Biol 7:1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton WD (1970) Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 228(5277):1218–1220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoogland JL (1996) Why do gunnison’s prairie dogs give anti-predator calls? Anim Behav 51:871–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marler P (1955) Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature 176:6–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morgan MJ, Godin JJ (1985) Antipredator benefits of schooling behaviour in a cyprinodontid fish, the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus). Z Tierpsychol 70:236–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murray JD (1989) Mathematical biology. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nowak MA (2006) Evolutionary dynamics: exploring the equations of life. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Owens NW, Goss-Custard JD (1976) The adaptive significance of alarm calls given by shore birds on their winter feeding grounds. Evolution 30:397–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (2017) Eavesdropping and cue denial in avian acoustic signals. Anim Behav 124:273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sherman PW (1985) Alarm calls of belding’s ground squirrels to aerial predators: nepotism or self-preservation? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith JM (1965) The evolution of alarm calls. Am Nat 99:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith JM (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith RJF (1986) Evolution of alarm signals: role of benefits of retaining group members or territorial neighbors. Am Nat 128:604–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46(1):35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A (2007) Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J Evol Biol 20(2):415–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Ciências Exatas e TecnológicasUniversidade do Estado de Mato GrossoSinopBrazil
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Matematica “Giuseppe Peano”Università di TorinoTorinoItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biologia dei SistemiUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly
  4. 4.Departamento de Ciências Exatas e da TerraUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoCuiabáBrazil

Personalised recommendations