Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 215–228 | Cite as

The effect of amenities on local wage distributions

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper predicts that local wage distributions will contract with an improvement in amenities by imposing structure on the standard model of amenity capitalization with multiple worker types (Roback in Econ Inq 26(1):23–41, 1988). The added structure is Ellickson’s (Am Econ Rev 61(2):334–339, 1971) single-crossing condition, which assumes that the willingness to accept higher housing prices for better amenities increases with income. The model predicts that under empirically plausible conditions, workers at the upper end of the wage distribution will earn less in locations with better amenities while those at the lower end will actually earn more.

Keywords

Amenities Wage distributions General equilibrium Migration 

JEL Classification

R0 J3 J6 

References

  1. Albouy, D.: Are big cities bad places to live? Estimating quality of life across metropolitan areas. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Albouy, D.: What are cities worth? Land rents, local productivity, and the capitalization of amenity values. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Banzhaf, S., Walsh, R.: Do people vote with their feet? An empirical test of Tiebout’s mechanism. Am. Econ. Rev. 98(3), 843–863 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum-Snow, N., Pavan, R.: Inequality and city size. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95(5), 1535–1548 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayer, P., Keohane, N., Timmins, C.: Migration and hedonic valuation: the case of air quality. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 58(1), 1–14 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beeson, P.: Amenities and regional differences in returns to worker characteristics. J. Urban Econ. 30(2), 224–241 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beeson, P.E.: Eberts. R.W.: Identifying productivity and amenity effects in interurban wage differentials. Rev. Econ. Stat. 71(3), 443–452 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, D., Kolesnikova, N., Taylor, L.: Earnings functions when wages and prices vary by location. J. Labor Econ. 27(1), 21–47 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blomquist, G.C., Berger, M.C., Hoehn, J.P.: New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. Am. Econ. Rev. 78(1), 89–107 (1988)Google Scholar
  10. Chen, Y., Rosenthal, S.: Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun? J. Urban Econ. 64(3), 519–537 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellickson, B.: Jurisdictional fragmentation and residential choice. Am. Econ. Rev. 61(2), 334–339 (1971)Google Scholar
  12. Epple, D., Sieg, H.: Estimating equilibrium models of local jurisdictions. J. Polit. Econ. 107(4), 645–681 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Epple, D., Filimon, R., Romer, T.: Equilibrium among local jurisdictions: toward an integrated approach of voting and residential choice. J. Public Econ. 24(3), 281–308 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Epple, D., Filimon, R., Romer, T.: Existence of voting and housing equilibrium in a system of com-existence of voting and housing equilibrium in a system of com- munities with property taxes. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 23(5), 585–610 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuerst, F., Shimizu, C.: Green luxury goods? The economics of eco-labels in the Japanese housing market. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 39(1), 108–122 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gyourko, J., Tracy, J.: The structure of local public finance and the quality of life. J. Polit. Econ. 99(4), 774–806 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen, J.L., Formby, J.P., Smith, W.J.: Estimating the income elasticity of demand for housing: a comparison of traditional and lorenz-concentration curve methodologies. J. Hous. Econ. 7(4), 328–342 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaramillo, F., Kempf, H., Moizeau, F.: Inequality and club formation. J. Public Econ. 87(5), 931–955 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kerr, C.: The effects of amenities on wage distributions and migratory responses to racial wage disparity. PhD thesis, University of Colorado (2011)Google Scholar
  20. Lee, S.: Ability sorting and consumer city. J. Urban Econ. 68(1), 20–33 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayo, S.K.: Theory and estimation in the economics of housing demand. J. Urban Econ. 10(1), 95–116 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moretti, E.: Estimating the social return to higher education: evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data. J. Econom. 121(1–2), 175–212 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moretti, E.: Real wage inequality. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 5(1), 65–103 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peiser, R.B., Smith, L.B.: Homeownership returns, tenure choice and inflation. Real Estate Econ. 13(4), 343–360 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roback, J.: Wages, rents, and the quality of life. J. Polit. Econ. 90(6), 1257–1278 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roback, J.: Wages, rents, and amenities: differences among workers and regions. Econ. Inq. 26(1), 23–41 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walsh, R.: Endogenous open space amenities in a locational equilibrium. J. Urban Econ. 61(2), 319–344 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wood, R.: Suburbia. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston (1958)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State Polytechnic University at PomonaPomonaUSA

Personalised recommendations