Cell cycle regulation in NAFLD: when imbalanced metabolism limits cell division

Abstract

Cell division is essential for organismal growth and tissue homeostasis. It is exceptionally significant in tissues chronically exposed to intrinsic and external damage, like the liver. After decades of studying the regulation of cell cycle by extracellular signals, there are still gaps in our knowledge on how these two interact with metabolic pathways in vivo. Studying the cross-talk of these pathways has direct clinical implications as defects in cell division, signaling pathways, and metabolic homeostasis are frequently observed in liver diseases. In this review, we will focus on recent reports which describe various functions of cell cycle regulators in hepatic homeostasis. We will describe the interplay between the cell cycle and metabolism during liver regeneration after acute and chronic damage. We will focus our attention on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, especially non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. The global incidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is increasing exponentially. Therefore, understanding the interplay between cell cycle regulators and metabolism may lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets amenable to intervention.

Introduction

The liver is the largest solid organ in the mammalian body. It fulfills essential roles in the gastrointestinal tract, controlling metabolism, detoxification, digestion, and many other essential processes [1]. Due to its functions and the strategic location alongside the gastrointestinal tract, it is constantly exposed to intrinsic and external damage. To maintain functionality, the liver has retained an impressive capacity to regenerate after injury [2]. The mechanisms underlying liver regeneration are classified into acute or chronic damage depending on nature, timing, and duration of the injury [3]. The critical difference is that regeneration after acute damage represents a synchronized physiological process [4]. In contrast, chronic damage is characterized by cycles of damage-regeneration similar to a wound healing response (Fig. 1). In this review, we will explore the interaction between metabolism and cell cycle in tissue regeneration after partial hepatectomy as a model of acute damage. Next, we will compare these processes in chronic damage, focusing especially in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Fig. 1
figure1

Principles of liver disease, injury, and regeneration. Currently, liver resection and transplantation are the first line therapy offered to patients with a range of liver diseases. a Diseased livers display impaired capacity of regeneration after resection. Liver regeneration is a mechanism by which hepatic cells compensate for the loss of liver mass. It is well synchronized, and in a relatively short period of time, the liver returns to its normal size by proliferation of hepatic cells. b One of the most common diseases in the clinical setting displays a significant increase in accumulation of lipids in the parenchyma of hepatocytes and is known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD leads to chronic damage of the hepatic parenchyma, promoting cycles of parenchyma damage and regeneration, leading to fibrosis and activation of immune cells recruited to clear debris. When cycles of damage/regeneration continue in the long-term, there will be more fibrosis and increased inflammation leading to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH may evolve to liver cirrhosis, cancer, and end-stage liver disease. During the development of NAFLD and progression to NASH, the capacity of regeneration of the liver by compensatory cellular hyperplasia is dramatically reduced as shown in the colored triangle in which red implies high and blue low capacity of regeneration

NAFLD represents the most frequent chronic liver disease in the world. It is characterized by the accumulation of lipid droplets in hepatic cells [5], combined with dysregulation of metabolism and cellular division [4]. Many questions remain open about the role of cell cycle and metabolic pathways during hepatic regeneration after acute and chronic damage. To resolve some of these questions, this review is divided into two parts: (1) in the first section, we will summarize recent data on various roles of cell cycle genes involved in hepatocyte division. Simultaneously, we will describe in detail the functions of metabolic genes during liver regeneration after hepatectomy as an example of acute liver damage (Fig. 1a). Then, (2) we will briefly outline data of studies on the regulation of the cell cycle in murine models of NAFLD as an example of chronic damage. Ultimately, we will propose potential nodes for targeting the interface between the cell cycle and metabolism to improve NAFLD treatment. Liver regeneration after hepatectomy is the standard method to study the synchronized regulation of cell cycle and metabolism in vivo. However, it is essential to highlight that the mechanism of tissue regeneration after resection is different from that of NAFLD.

The regulation of the cell cycle, signaling, and metabolism during acute hepatic damage and regeneration

Liver regeneration after acute injury strands for an adaptive response by which the liver compensates for the loss of functional tissue using cellular hypertrophy (increase in the size of hepatic cells) and/or hyperplasia ([2, 3], Fig. 1a). Two features render liver regeneration unique compared to repair and healing of other tissues. First, before injury, hepatocytes are in a quiescent state. However, when the liver is confronted with damage hepatocytes are able to re-enter the cell cycle despite being fully differentiated. Therefore, they may function as “facultative” stem cells (for more details on the role of liver stem cells in liver regeneration refer to [2]). Second, hepatic regeneration is well synchronized. Third, the rate of cellular division during regeneration is controlled by several factors. Growth factors from other organs including cytokines from an inflammatory response, metabolic signals, circadian rhythm, and blood pressure are among the most significant ones [2].

The best-described models to study liver regeneration after acute damage are (1) liver resection (partial hepatectomy [3]) and (2) toxicological damage [6]. The essential difference is that the latter induces parenchymatic necrosis, and hepatocyte proliferation is integrated into a complex wound healing response with fibrosis and inflammation [6]. In contrast, 2/3 liver resection activates cell division in the absence of any cellular lesion [3]. In the following discussion, the regenerative response of the liver to partial hepatectomy will be divided into three groups of processes, namely: (1) the activation of cellular signaling pathways; (2) regulation of cell cycle progression; and (3) remodeling of metabolism (Fig. 1a). While these events are occurring simultaneously, the proposed classification solely aims to facilitate the description. We will initially introduce general ideas about the regulation of these three processes independently. Subsequently, we will highlight potential nodes of interaction between the three groups of biological processes.

Regulation of cellular signaling during liver regeneration

Resection of 2/3 of the liver activates an acute phase response followed by a profound rearrangement of the entire cellular signaling network [7]. Based on the consecutive activation of a diverse group of transcription factors (TFs), the process of liver regeneration is conceptually divided into three phases: priming, progression, and termination (Fig. 2). The initiation phase is characterized by a fast activation of early-response genes [2] with a dramatic increase in blood pressure [8]. Collectively, these initiating events have been associated with the release of IL-6 and activation of the IL-6-gp130-Stat3 axis in Kupffer cells [9]. IL-6 from Kupffer cells activates the IL-6 receptor gp130 in hepatocytes which in turn will phosphorylate STAT3, causing increases in transcriptional activity (Fig. 2). Early response TFs promote the activation of a second group known as late-response genes that undergo de novo transcription and translation [2]. Combined with other TFs activated by growth factors like hepatocyte and epidermal growth factors (EGF, HGF), the IL-6-gp130 axis activates expression of key cell cycle genes [10,11,12,13,14,15].

Fig. 2
figure2

Regulation of cell cycle by auto and paracrine signaling during liver regeneration. Liver regeneration is a well synchronized process by which the liver recovers in response to acute damage. In the most studied model of liver regeneration, 2/3 of the liver mass is removed which triggers a cascade of activation of signaling pathways within hepatocytes promoting regeneration. The first wave of genes is activated by autocrine and paracrine signals. These transcription factors are known as early response genes of liver regeneration which license the expression of cell cycle genes during the initiation phase of the regenerative process. The second wave of transcription factors, known as delayed response genes of liver regeneration, further promotes cell cycle progression allowing hepatocytes to enter the S-phase of cell cycle. DNA replication is one of the only cellular autonomous processes in hepatocytes, and it always occurs between 32 and 38 h after liver resection, and it is marked by a peak in expression of cell cycle genes, like CDKs and cyclins. After one or two rounds of cell division, most genes that promote cellular proliferation will be reduced in expression and the regenerative process enters the termination phase. The last phase is characterized by a balance of cell division and apoptosis, until the liver reaches the optimal size

Cell cycle genes drive the progression phase until the onset of the termination phase [16]. Within 1–2 weeks after resection, any remaining cellular division will eventually cease in murine livers. As such, two weeks after resection, the liver will adjust to the initial pre-resection size and function while in other mammals the process may take longer time. The final stage of regeneration is characterized by the termination phase. Here, the liver-to-body weight ratio is carefully adjusted. The ratio is regulated by the rate of hepatic division and apoptosis until the liver reaches an adequate size and all normal physiological functions are restored [17, 18].

Regulation of the cell cycle: the role of hypertrophy and cellular division during regeneration

Another distinctive feature of liver regeneration is the dynamic alterations in cellular hypertrophy and division [19]. Normally, after hepatocytes are primed by injury, they temporarily increase in size with a subsequent activation of cell cycle genes and cellular division [17]. However, we and others have shown that an increase in hepatocyte size alone is sufficient to recover organ mass in the absence of cell division in mice. For example deletion of the cell cycle genes Skp2 or Cdk1 [20,21,22,23] does not impair regeneration. In addition, early observations indicated that components of the mTOR-AKT signaling are essential to activate an alternative regenerative response to promote tissue recovery by compensatory cellular hypertrophy [19, 24, 25]. Nevertheless, we also observed that compensatory cellular hypertrophy is sufficient for mass recovery, but liver functions are reduced [26]. On top of that, our recent unpublished data suggest that in the long-term, increases in the size of hepatocytes may induce activation of an inflammatory response and fibrosis. In conclusion, in the short term cell hypertrophy may offer an alternative form of tissue regeneration, but may not be sufficient for recovery of liver functions.

During liver regeneration, hepatocytes display an equivalent pattern of expression of cell cycle genes comparable to that observed in cell culture models in vitro (for an exhaustive review on cell cycle regulators refer to Refs. [27, 28] and Fig. 2). For example, before liver resection, most genes involved in cell division like Cdk1 and cyclin B are downregulated. Instead genes involved in quiescence like p21Cip1/Waf1 and p27Kip1 are highly expressed [12, 29,30,31]. During the initiation phase of liver regeneration, the expression of genes involved in G1 progression like cyclin D and Cdk4 is induced [29]. Finally, during the progression phase of regeneration most cell cycle genes are actively expressed [32, 33] (Fig. 3). However, there are several exceptions to this rule. For example, the murine cyclin B transcript is regulated at different time points during liver regeneration, with a peak of expression that coincides with the peak of DNA replication (S-phase, ≈ 36 h after resection) [34, 35]. Additionally, in regenerating livers cyclin A and cyclin B are observed in the cytoplasmic, nuclear, and membrane containing fractions [36, 37]. In the same way, Cdk1 is expressed as early as 30 h after hepatectomy, which is the period of DNA replication in regenerating hepatocytes [38]. These observations suggest that Cdk1 may display novel functions outside of mitosis, which is supported by recent data [26, 38] but was not observed in vitro models. Collectively, these results suggest that Cdk1 and its partners cyclin A and cyclin B, may possess non-canonical functions in the liver, different to the ones described in cell culture systems. We and others have shown that during liver regeneration Cdk1 controls cell size and cell division [39], cell metabolism [26], and DNA replication [38, 40]. However, little data is available on the partners cyclin A and cyclin B. Hence, further studies may be essential to understand the roles of these cyclins during liver regeneration.

Fig. 3
figure3

Regulation of cell cycle progression, cellular division and hypertrophy during regeneration. The progression phase of liver regeneration depends on the synchronized expression of cell cycle genes. Within hepatocytes, cyclins and CDKs, as well as their inhibitors, show a similar expression pattern to that observed in vitro models of cell culture. However, many new functions have been shown recently, such as regulation of DNA replication by CDK1, or interactions with metabolic pathways

Metabolic regulation during liver regeneration after acute liver damage

The liver is a vital center for homeostasis of glucose, lipid, and overall metabolism [41]. Therefore, acute tissue damage imposes significant stress to the general metabolic performance of the whole organ. Nevertheless, during liver regeneration after 2/3 liver resection, hepatocytes are able to remodel their metabolic network to promote regeneration while maintaining overall systemic metabolic balance. These early observations suggest that liver metabolism is robust. In this sense, metabolic pathways compensate for the loss of many individual enzymes, which is supported by mouse genetics [42,43,44,45]. However, liver specific deletion of some enzymes including nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (Nampt) and several members of the P450 cytochrome reductase family leads to lethality after partial hepatectomy [46,47,48].

The changes in metabolic demands usually induce small rearrangements in metabolism through local mechanisms without substantial rewiring of the overall metabolic network [41]. However, 2/3 partial hepatectomy leads to both loss of tissue mass and glycogen, a major energy reservoir for systemic glucose and energy metabolism [49]. Major resection of glycogen in the liver, leads to a substantial reduction in blood glucose. This is particularly apparent during the initiation phase of liver regeneration when there is a significant increase in the oxidative status as a response to a whole body induction of catabolism [49]. Because glucose supply via glycogenolysis is limited, the energy required to promote liver regeneration may be partly acquired from alternative sources that are actively transported into hepatocyte, such as lipids [50]. In fact, deletion of the Caveolin1 (Cav1) gene induced hepatic failure during early phases of liver regeneration, indicating that lipid import into hepatocytes is essential to drive regeneration [51]. CAV1 is essential to transport lipids into hepatocytes. Therefore, these observations are in agreement with temporary hepatic steatosis being a key feature of the early stages of liver regeneration [52, 53]. Interestingly, physiological steatosis does not overlap with cell division during liver regeneration, which may imply that lipid metabolism and cell division are strictly temporally separated. However, these ideas need to be further tested.

During the termination phase of liver regeneration, hepatic gluconeogenic functions regain homeostatic levels, marked by a sharp increase in expression of Akt [44]. These events are followed by the activation of biosynthetic pathways to promote tissue homeostasis, accumulation of glycogen as well as normal glucose and lipid metabolic processes. Based on the main two primary sources of energy, we would like to propose a division of metabolic-related events during liver regeneration in two phases (1) oxidative and (2) biosynthetic (Fig. 4). The oxidation phase is distinguished by oxidative metabolism correlated to increases in cell size. This would last from the early minutes after liver resection to 30 h, when hepatic DNA synthesis starts to peak (Fig. 4). After that, the biosynthetic pathways will be active until metabolic homeostasis is reached.

Fig. 4
figure4

Interaction of cell cycle genes with major metabolic pathways. After 2/3 mass removal, there are significant changes in hemodynamic pressure in the liver, leading to oxidative stress. Moreover, resection of 70% of the hepatic glycogen stores leads to hypoglycemia, which in turn promotes lipolysis of adipose tissue. These lipids are transported into hepatocytes in the initiation phase of regeneration and produce energy through oxidation. When DNA replication and cellular division starts, there is a reduction of oxidation and concomitantly activation of biosynthetic pathways. In this context, CDK1 may regulate metabolite production in the mitochondria, like NADH and FAD, or it may directly phosphorylate transcription factors like SREBP-1c, or other enzymes involved in anabolic pathways like PFKFB3

Interactions between cell cycle regulators and metabolism during acute liver damage

Reduction in blood glucose represents one of the primary metabolic markers of hepatic regeneration [26]. The characteristic short-term hypoglycemia is required for adequate liver regeneration. This is supported by clinical data indicating that patients with hyperglycemia typically experience an adverse regenerative outcome [54]. Another cause for decreased concentration of glucose in serum is the reduced expression of metabolic enzymes during the priming and progression phases [17]. We have recently published similar findings in mice employing a combination of transcriptomic, metabolomic and advanced molecular imaging [26].

During cellular division CDK1 phosphorylates specific subunits of the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complex I [55, 56]. In this sense, CDK1 may couple cell division and energy metabolism. In post-mitotic tissues, CDK1 regulates gluconeogenic pathways by phosphorylation of FOXO-1 [57] and glycolytic genes like PFKFB3 [58, 59]. Following this line of evidence, we published that ablation of CDK1 in hepatocytes led to a significant reduction in NADH concentration because mitochondrial function is suboptimal [60]. These observations are in agreement with recent reports suggesting that deletion of Nampt reduced hepatocyte proliferation during regeneration [47]. Collectively, these results suggest an interplay between the oxidative state of hepatocytes and CDK1. Deletion of Cdk1 in the liver led to a significant reduction in mitochondrial metabolic processes during S-phase [26]. A standard explanation for this is that DNA replication and oxidative metabolism are not compatible. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated as a side-product of oxidative metabolism would be detrimental when the maintenance of DNA fidelity is most critical [61, 62].

Cholesterol and the cell cycle

In the previous sections, we highlighted that hepatic accumulation of lipid droplets is associated with the initiation of regeneration and not cellular division. Therefore, we speculate that the presence of either lipid droplets or their components are incompatible with proliferation. A lipid droplet is composed by triglycerides, lipoproteins, cholesterol and other components [63]. Cholesterol represents the fundamental structural component and thus is essential for its formation. In mammals there are two main sources of cholesterol, (1) gastrointestinal digestion and (2) biosynthesis. Regardless of the source, cholesterol is stored and metabolized as esterified cholesterol in pericentral hepatocytes [64]. As mentioned earlier, during liver regeneration the metabolic capacity of hepatocytes is heavily reduced, and it is expected that cholesterol production may be hindered as well. In fact, our preliminary data show that concentration of serum total, free and esterified cholesterol are significantly reduced during liver regeneration (unpublished).

In mice, hepatic Srebp-1c is an essential gene for the transcriptional activation of enzymes involved in cholesterol metabolic processes. Deletion of Srebp-1c in hepatocytes led to increased accumulation of cholesterol [65], with no changes in the composition of other lipids. When mice without Srebp-1c were subjected to 2/3 partial hepatectomy, hepatocyte division was significantly enhanced in comparison to wild type mice [65]. This was in agreement with previous observations that showed reduced expression of CDK1 and less mitotic cells upon cholesterol starvation [66, 67]. Together, these studies further support the idea that there might be a relationship between cholesterol metabolism and cellular division. We have shown that reduced division rate of cells during liver regeneration, led to a significant reduction in expression of enzymes from cholesterol and mevalonate pathway, suggesting an interaction between the machinery that regulates cell cycle and that of cholesterol synthesis. This is further supported by experiments indicating that during cell cycle progression, cells regulate their lipid composition and localization [68]. We are currently dissecting the molecular mechanism by which CDK1 may regulate cholesterol synthesis in hepatocytes. Forthcoming work should address the association between the formation of lipid droplets during physiological steatosis and cellular division during liver regeneration independently.

The bidirectional interaction of metabolism and cell division during liver regeneration after chronic damage

NAFLD is characterized by a sustained insult to the parenchyma, with alternating cycles of damage and regeneration. The liver does not regenerate optimally in patients with NAFLD, NASH, and/or obese patients [69, 70]. Indeed, it has been proposed that steatosis in patients before liver resection is a risk factor for liver failure after hepatectomy [70] and causes postoperative complications [71]. Growing evidence has indicated that NAFLD is typically associated with increased synthesis of lipids derived from long-chain fatty acids, like palmitic and linoleic acids [72]. These macromolecules promote the characteristic inflammatory response through the production of lipotoxic molecules [72]. However, and more importantly, these bioactive lipid precursors usually activate lipid peroxidation, with a concomitant reduction in mitochondria function and increased oxidative stress by production of ROS [72]. In this context, cell cycle progression is impaired, with concomitant activation of apoptosis which further promotes inflammation and fibrosis. In contrast to a healthy liver, hepatocyte-dependent regeneration is diminished in the chronically damaged liver. In this section, the potential associations between cell division and metabolism will be discussed in two in models of diabetes, obesity, NAFLD, and NASH.

Hepatocyte cell cycle progression in genetic models of obesity and diabetes

NAFLD evolves from the response of altered (1) lipid transport into hepatocytes; (2) increased production of lipids from hepatocytes; as well as (3) reduced export and consumption of lipids [63]. In diabetes and obesity, NAFLD is accompanied by changes in insulin metabolism [5]. In hepatocytes, insulin promotes the biosynthesis of lipids by inhibiting fatty acid oxidation, with leptin being essential for the insulin response [73]. Murine models with mutations in either leptin or the leptin receptor gene led to body fat accumulation, and the onset of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Initial observations using these mouse models demonstrated impaired cell cycle progression of hepatocytes after liver regeneration. For example, hepatocytes from Zucker rats arrested in G1, with a concomitant lower expression of cyclin D1 after hepatectomy [74]. These initial results led to the hypothesis that accumulation of fat droplets may negatively regulate hepatic cell division and reduce cell proliferation. Besides, in ob/ob mice survival rate after liver resection was significantly also lower than in wild type. These mice do not produce leptin, and displayed significant hypoglycemia as well as impaired hepatocellular proliferation after liver resection [75]. These effects occur with no difference in serum concentration of pro-proliferative hormones during liver regeneration like TNFα, IL-6, and insulin. In a third model, fa/fa rats displayed elevated concentration of leptin in blood and a similar reduction in the survival after hepatectomy [76]. Nonetheless, leptin replacement restored TNFα and IL-6 release and induced cyclin D1, suggesting that leptin may play a central role in the interaction between cell cycle regulators and lipid metabolism [77]. A conflicting result arises from the fact that leptin supplementation improved hepatic division, but did not reduce the onset of liver failure [78, 79]. In addition, intraperitoneal injection of leptin in wild type mice with no obesity increased mitotic counts during liver regeneration [78]. Collectively, these results suggest that adipokines play a significant role in hepatocellular proliferation. Similar results were observed in a model of fatty liver in ALPPS rats [80]. In summary, leptin is essential for hepatic division and together with other factors may act in recovery after hepatectomy [81]. Subsequent research should address the role of adipokines like leptin in regulation of hepatic cell cycle genes.

Cell cycle progression in models of diet manipulation

To promote lipid overloading independently of a genetic mutation, many experiments provide mice with a high-fat diet (HFD). These models are more clinically-relevant compared to mice with mutations in enzymes. HFD leads to high calorie intake, body weight increase, liver steatosis and reduced regeneration caused by metabolic surplus [82, 83]. Liver regeneration in mice fed with HFD was accompanied by increased TNF-α potentially amplified by leptin which promoted increased levels of IκBα preventing NF-κB activation. Consequently, expression of NF-κB target genes, including cyclin D1 was reduced [82] (Fig. 5) leading to a decrease in proliferation of hepatocytes. Mice fed with HFD display a delayed incorporation of BrdU after surgery [84], indicating that steatosis not only inhibits cell division but also delays DNA replication. Expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E2 are usually higher before partial hepatectomy in mice fed with HFD. However, there was no significant difference in expression between mice fed with HFD and Chow diets during liver regeneration [84]. In contrast, cyclin A2 and cyclin B1 are significantly reduced during liver regeneration in mice fed with HFD, further suggesting that cell division might be impaired [82]. In conclusion, these observations suggest that leptin-related steatosis due to HFD may regulate cell cycle progression differentially by downstream control of the inflammatory pathway NF-κB, which is supported by studies done in mice with lipodystrophy [85]. Lipid synthesis and degradation, as well as the correct localization of the corresponding enzymes are essential for cell division [68]. To the same extent, cell cycle effectors regulate directly or indirectly lipid synthesis in hepatocytes. To follow up on these topics, in the next section we will summarize current data on how cell cycle regulators control lipid synthesis. We will particularly focus on a novel axis of molecular signaling that we describe as the p21-CDK1-E2F1-lipid synthesis axis.

Fig. 5
figure5

Bidirectional regulation of cell cycle and metabolism in NAFLD. Development of NAFLD depends on daily habits, diabetes, obesity, genetic predispositions and/or other cooperating factors. Recently, a common SNP in p53 in NAFLD patients hinted that hyperactivation of this transcription factor may promote fatty liver disease. The proposed involves increases in the expression of p21. Alternatively, other SNPs have been found in p21 that lead to its overexpression in NAFLD. Importantly, p21 may predispose to steatohepatitis by two mechanisms that may or may not work together. Initially, by increasing phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (RB), it may promote constant activation of the transcription factor E2F1 leading to increase in lipogenesis. Similarly, blocking functions of CDK1 may lead to increases in oxidative stress which promotes NAFLD due to chronic damage

Lipid metabolism and cell cycle in NAFLD

NAFLD pathogenesis displays a broad phenotype ranging from cellular steatosis, characterized by micro and macrovesicles, to NASH with substantial inflammation and fibrosis. As mentioned above, an increasing amount of evidence indicates that the synthesis of a particular group of lipids in NAFLD hepatocytes may initiate the activation of inflammation. In recent years, several reports have suggested that the direct consequence of the chronic metabolic inflammation is the activation of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [4] with a concomitant increase in expression of the senescence marker p21Cip1/Waf1 [86]. Cellular senescence is a biological process activated by an irreversible cell cycle arrest. Replicative senescence is associated with aging of tissues, mainly caused by shortening of the telomeres. In contrast, stress-induced premature senescence is caused by DNA damage caused by intra or extracellular factors such as oxidative stress. Either type of senescence leads to a DNA damage response, which inhibits cell cycle progression. In NAFLD, chronic metabolic surplus generates many of the molecules involved in cellular senescence, like ROS, with a concomitant change in gene expression. Several genome wide association studies (GWAS) have found a significant correlation between increased frequency of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Cdkn1a gene (encoding p21Cip1/Waf1) that leads to increased p21Cip1/Waf1 expression in NAFLD [86, 87]. Increases in expression of p21Cip1/Waf1 is one of the main markers of senescence [87], because it is a potent negative regulator of CDK1 activity. Moreover, our data demonstrates that long term deletion of Cdk1 in hepatic cells induced hepatic expression of p21Cip1/Waf1, cellular senescence, fibrosis and inflammation (unpublished data). In this section we will summarize the current role of hepatic cell cycle regulators in lipid biosynthesis, senescence and onset of NAFLD.

The p21-Cdk1-E2F1 axis

Recent findings have indicated that NAFLD livers display lower expression of Cdk1 [88]. CDK1 is essential for mitotic division, but in hepatic cells CDK1 may have other functions beyond mitosis. For example, we have shown that deletion of Cdk1 in hepatocytes leads to increases in nuclear and cell size [21]. DNA re-replication by endoreduplication may be the underlying cause of this effect. During endoreduplication, hepatic cells may generate oxidative stress leading to chronic liver damage [88]. In this setting, p21Cip1/Waf1 negatively regulates CDK1, and therefore increased levels of p21Cip1/Waf1 in liver disease may correlate with reduced activity of CDK1 [88]. Therefore, it may be therapeutically feasible to reduce the expression of p21Cip1/Waf1 in hepatocytes to reduce NAFLD. However, the pleiotropic functions of p21Cip1/Waf1 are likely to make it an “undruggable” target. Interestingly, it was recently shown that senotherapeutic drugs improved liver regeneration when p21 was overexpressed further suggesting that SASP may inhibit liver regeneration [89].

An important function for p21Cip1/Waf1 is the transcriptional regulation of cell cycle genes. Typically, p21Cip1/Waf1 binds with high affinity to and inhibits CDK2/cyclin E activity [39] which leads to hypo-phosphorylation of the RB protein [90]. Hypophosphorylated RB remains bound to E2F1, repressing its activation and cell cycle progression. Recent results highlighted a number of novel metabolic functions of E2F1 [91]. For example, E2F1 mRNA and protein are increased in NASH livers [92]. On top of that, hepatic deletion of E2f1 significantly decreased fibrosis as a consequence of downregulation of the Egr-1 gene [93, 94]. Moreover, E2F1 regulates the expression of essential genes in lipid synthesis such as Acaca, Fasn, Scd1, Srebp1c, and Chrebp [92]. The interaction of p21Cip1/Waf1 with CDK1 may lead to inactivation of E2F1. E2F1 also drives the expression of Cdk1 [94]. In this fashion, p21Cip1/Waf1 regulates cell cycle progression (Fig. 5), cellular division, senescence and metabolism through the expression of numerous genes, including lipogenic enzymes {for review see [95]}.

Finally, the transcription of p21Cip1/Waf1 is activated by p53. In response to DNA damage, p53 promotes the expression of p21Cip1/Waf1, leading to cell cycle arrest and senescence [22, 96, 97]. Simultaneously, p53 regulates the transcription of many genes involved in glycolysis, lipogenesis and other metabolic pathways [98]. Particularly interesting is the discovery of frequent SNPs variants in p53 that predispose patients to develop obesity and NAFLD [99] (Fig. 5). When these variants were introduced in mice fed with HFD, they caused significant increases in body weight with liver steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis [100]. These mice also displayed a remarkable increase in the expression of p21Cip1/Waf1 and inflammatory genes. Moreover, under fasting conditions, hepatic cells accumulate lipid droplets which correlate with increased expression of both p53 [99, 100] and p21 [86, 87]. Collectively, these observations suggest that p53 may fulfill essential roles upstream of p21 Cip1/Waf1 and Cdk1 in NAFLD.

Conclusion and future perspective

The regulation of cell cycle progression, its components and the interactions among them has been meticulously studied for more than four decades. Most of the basic functions discovered in vitro have been validated in vivo with similar physiological significance. However, an increasing number of studies now indicate that a large number of cell cycle regulators, including CDK1, influence metabolism which are new interactions that may not depend on cell cycle progression. This may not be surprising as cells need to integrate their growth with cell proliferation, into a wider network of biosynthetic pathways. However, this point has been largely ignored as the focus has been in the upstream signaling pathways regulating cell cycle progression. Studying the interplay between cell cycle and metabolism in detail will lead to development of more refined therapies for the treatment of diseases.

Particularly important is to understand the role of key cell cycle regulators CDK1 and p21 in regulating metabolic pathways during acute and chronic liver damage. The reasoning behind this is that if there is a distinction between the pro-regenerative functions of these two, and other functions, then it may be able to target them in NAFLD. It is well established that liver regeneration is dramatically reduced in patients with NAFLD, and therefore resection and transplantation is not an ideal therapy for this group of patients. This is exacerbated in the more advanced stage of disease, like NASH. In this setting, targeting pro-regenerative pathways of hepatocytes may lead to a better outcome. Our group has actively studied the non-canonical functions of Cdk1, but those of p21 have been neglected. For example, we have preliminary data indicating that downregulation of Cdk1 may lead to a NAFLD-like phenotype in the long term, with fibrosis and steatosis. Thus, in NAFLD patients it would be therapeutically relevant to disrupt the p21-Cdk1 axis, with increasing Cdk1 functions while reducing those of p21. However, there is a gap on our understanding of the functions of increased expression of p21 and its activity in the context of deletion of Cdk1, or if the observed phenotype is a Cdk1-autonomous effect.

Finally, studies of NAFLD have focused mostly on targeting inflammatory or non- parenchymal cells. Thus, studying the cell cycle and non-canonical functions of p21 and Cdk1 in hepatocytes may lead to far reaching therapeutic approaches for either early NAFLD or specially advanced NASH. Ideally personalized therapies may be developed, in which expression of p21 would be reduced in patients with SNPs in the promoter region. Following this approach, we will be able to reduce the signaling associated with increased p21 activity. These future discoveries will have direct implications in the development of therapeutic agents targeting both, metabolism and cell division, for these common liver diseases, NAFLD and NASH.

References

  1. 1.

    Tsung A, Geller DA. Gross and cellular anatomy of the liver. In: Monga SPS, editor. Molecular pathology of liver diseases. Pittsburg: Springer; 2011. p. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fausto N, Campbell JS, Riehle KJ. Liver regeneration. Hepatology 2006;43(2 Suppl 1):S45–S53

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Valizadeh A, et al. The roles of signaling pathways in liver repair and regeneration. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(9):14966–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Forbes SJ, Newsome PN. Liver regeneration—mechanisms and models to clinical application. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;13(8):473–485

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Brunt EM, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Dis Prim 2015;1:15080

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bhushan B, Udayan A. Liver regeneration after acetaminophen hepatotoxicuty: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Am J Pathol 2019;189(4):719–729

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kurinna S, Barton MC. Cascades of transcription regulation during liver regeneration. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2011;43(2):189–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lorenz L, et al. Mechanosensing by beta1 integrin induces angiocrine signals for liver growth and survival. Nature 2018;562(7725):128–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Aldeguer X, et al. Interleukin-6 from intrahepatic cells of bone marrow origin is required for normal murine liver regeneration. Hepatology 2002;35(1):40–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Matsui T, et al. STAT3 down-regulates the expression of cyclin D during liver development. J Biol Chem 2002;277(39):36167–36173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Albrecht J, et al. Regulation of G(1) cyclin-dependent kinases in the liver: role of nuclear localization and p27 sequestration. Am J Physiol 1999;277(6):G1207–G1216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Albrecht J, et al. Involvement of p21 and p27 in the regulation of CDK activity and cell cycle progression in the regenerating liver. Oncogene 1998;16(16):2141–2150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Albrecht J, Hu M, Cerra F. Distinct patterns of cyclin D1 regulation in models of liver regeneration and human liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995;209(2):648–655

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Factor VM, et al. Loss of c-Met disrupts gene expression program required for G2/M progression during liver regeneration in mice. PLoS One. 2010;5(9):e12739.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Borowiak M, et al. Met provides essential signals for liver regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101(29):10608–10613

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chauhan A, et al. Regulation of mammalian cell cycle progression in the regenerating liver. J Theor Biol 2011;283(1):103–112

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Arai M, et al. Gene expression profiling reveals the mechanism and pathophysiology of mouse liver regeneration. J Biol Chem 2003;278(32):29813–29818

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hohmann N, et al. How does a single cell know when the liver has reached its correct size? PLoS ONE 2014;9(4):e93207

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Miyaoka Y, et al. Hypertrophy and unconventional cell division of hepatocytes underlie liver regeneration. Curr Biol 2012;22(13):1166–1175

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hui T, et al. Immediate early genes and p21 regulation in liver of rats with acute hepatic failure. Am J Surg 2002;183(4):457–463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Diril MK, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is essential for cell division and suppression of DNA re-replication but not for liver regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109(10):3826–3831

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kurinna S, et al. p53 regulates a mitotic transcription program and determines ploidy in normal mouse liver. Hepatology 2013;57(5):2004–2133

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kossatz U, et al. Skp2-dependent degradation of p27kip1 is essential for cell cycle progression. Genes Dev 2004;18(21):2602–2607

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Haga S, et al. Compensatory recovery of liver mass by Akt-mediated hepatocellular hypertrophy in liver-specific STAT3-deficient mice. J Hepatol 2005;43(5):799–807

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Haga S, et al. The survival pathways phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3-K)/phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1)/Akt modulate liver regeneration through hepatocyte size rather than proliferation. Hepatology 2009;49(1):204–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Caldez MJ, et al. Metabolic remodeling during liver regeneration. Dev Cell 2018;47(4):425–438 (e5)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hydbring P, Malumbres M, Sicinski P. Non-canonical functions of cell cycle cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2016;17(5):280–292

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lim S, Kaldis P. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development 2013;140(15):3079–3093

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ilyin G, et al. Regulation and role of p21 and p27 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors during hepatocyte differentiation and growth. Am J Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2003;285(1):G115–G117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Loyer P, et al. Expression and activation of cdks (1 and 2) and cyclins in the cell cycle progression during liver regeneration. J Biol Chem 1994;269(4):2491–2500

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rohlfing AK, et al. Partial hepatectomy in rats results in immediate down-regulation of p27Kip1 in residual liver tissue by transcriptional and post-translational processes. Front Physiol 2013;4:139

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chauhan A, et al. A mesoscale model of G1/S phase transition in liver regeneration. J Theor Biol 2008;252(3):465–473

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pujol MJ, et al. Differential association of p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 with cyclin E-CDK2 during rat liver regeneration. J Hepatol 2000;33(3):266–274

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Trembley JH, Kren BT, Steer CJ. Posttranscriptional regulation of cyclin B messenger RNA expression in the regenerating rat liver. Cell Growth Differ 1994;5(1):99–108

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Trembley JH, et al. Differential regulation of cyclin B1 RNA and protein expression during hepatocyte growth in vivo. Cell Growth Differ 1996;7(7):903–916

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Spiewak Rinaudo JA, Thorgeirsson SS. Detection of a tyrosine-phosphorylated form of cyclin A during liver regeneration. Cell Growth Differ 1997;8(3):301–309

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Verges M, et al. Cyclin A is present in the endocytic compartment of rat liver cells and increases during liver regeneration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997;230(1):49–53

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Garnier D, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 plays a critical role in DNA replication control during rat liver regeneration. Hepatology 2009;50(6):1946–1956

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Satyanarayana A, Hilton MB, Kaldis P. p21 Inhibits Cdk1 in the absence of Cdk2 to maintain the G1/S phase DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Biol Cell 2008;19(1):65–77

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Szmyd R, et al. Premature activation of Cdk1 leads to mitotic events in S phase and embryonic lethality. Oncogene 2019;38(7):998–1018

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rui L. Energy metabolism in the liver. Compr Physiol 2014;4(1):177–197

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Moncada S, Higgs EA, Colombo SL. Fulfilling the metabolic requirements for cell proliferation. Biochem J 2012;446(1):1–7

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Anderson SP, et al. Delayed liver regeneration in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha-null mice. Hepatology 2002;36(3):544–554

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Espeillac C, et al. S6 kinase 1 is required for rapamycin-sensitive liver proliferation after mouse hepatectomy. J Clin Investig 2011;121(7):2821–2832

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Huang W, et al. Nuclear receptor-dependent bile acid signaling is required for normal liver regeneration. Science 2006;312(5771):233–236

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Varela-Rey M, et al. Impaired liver regeneration in mice lacking glycine N-methyltransferase. Hepatology 2009;50(2):443–452

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mukherjee S, et al. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide biosynthesis promotes liver regeneration. Hepatology 2017;65(2):616–630

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Meng Z, et al. Insufficient bile acid signaling impairs liver repair in CYP27(−/−) mice. J Hepatol 2011;55(4):885–895

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Crumm S, et al. Adenine nucleotide changes in the remnant liver: an early signal for regeneration after partial hepatectomy. Hepatology 2008;48(3):898–908

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kachaylo E, et al. PTEN down-regulation promotes beta-oxidation to fuel hypertrophic liver growth after hepatectomy in mice. Hepatology 2017;66(3):908–921

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fernandez M, et al. Caveolin-1 is essential for liver regeneration. Science 2006;313(5793):1628–1632

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Shteyer E, et al. Disruption of hepatic adipogenesis is associated with impaired liver regeneration in mice. Hepatology 2004;40(6):1322–1332

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Garcia-Arcos I, et al. Lipid analysis reveals quiescent and regenerating liver-specific populations of lipid droplets. Lipids 2010;45(12):1101–1108

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Huang J, et al. Postponing the hypoglycemic response to partial hepatectomy delays mouse liver regeneration. Am J Pathol 2016;186(3):587–599

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wang Z, et al. Cyclin B1/Cdk1 coordinates mitochondrial respiration for cell-cycle G2/M progression. Dev Cell 2014;29(2):217–232

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Qin L, et al. CDK1 enhances mitochondrial bioenergetics for radiation-induced DNA repair. Cell Rep 2015;13(10):2056–2063

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Yuan Z, et al. Activation of FOXO1 by Cdk1 in cycling cells and postmitotic neurons. Science 2008;319(5870):1665–1668

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Yalcin A, et al. 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase (PFKFB3) promotes cell cycle progression and suppresses apoptosis via Cdk1-mediated phosphorylation of p27. Cell Death Dis 2014;5:e1337

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Yalcin A, et al. Nuclear targeting of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase (PFKFB3) increases proliferation via cyclin-dependent kinases. J Biol Chem 2009;284(36):24223–24232

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Miettinen TP, et al. Identification of transcriptional and metabolic programs related to mammalian cell size. Curr Biol 2014;24(6):598–608

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Tu BP, et al. Cyclic changes in metabolic state during the life of a yeast cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104(43):16886–16891

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Chen Z, et al. Restriction of DNA replication to the reductive phase of the metabolic cycle protects genome integrity. Science 2007;316(5833):1916–1919

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Huang J, Borensztajn J, Reddy JK. Hepatic lipid metabolism. In: Monga SPS, editor. Molecular pathology of liver diseases. Pittsburg: Springer; 2011. p. 133–146

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Hijmans BS, et al. Zonation of glucose and fatty acid metabolism in the liver: mechanism and metabolic consequences. Biochimie 2014;96:121–129

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Peng J, et al. Enhanced liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)-1c-null mice is associated with increased hepatocellular cholesterol availability. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018;47(2):784–799

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Martínez-Botas J, et al. Cholesterol starvation decreases p34(cdc2) kinase activity and arrests the cell cycle at G2. FASEB J. 1999;13(11):1359–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Fernandez C, et al. Cholesterol is essential for mitosis progression and its deficiency induces polyploid cell formation. Exp Cell Res 2004;300(1):109–120

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Atilla-Gokcumen GE, et al. Dividing cells regulate their lipid composition and localization. Cell 2014;156(3):428–439

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    McCormack L, et al. Hepatic steatosis is a risk factor for postoperative complications after major hepatectomy: a matched case-control study. Ann Surg 2007;245(6):923–930

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Dutkowski P, et al. Challenges to liver transplantation and strategies to improve outcomes. Gastroenterology 2015;148(2):307–323

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Vetelainen R, van Vliet AK, van Gulik TM. Severe steatosis increases hepatocellular injury and impairs liver regeneration in a rat model of partial hepatectomy. Ann Surg 2007;245(1):44–50

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Mendez-Sanchez N, et al. New aspects of lipotoxicity in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(7):2034.

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Perry RJ, et al. Leptin mediates a glucose-fatty acid cycle to maintain glucose homeostasis in starvation. Cell 2018;172(1–2):234–248

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Selzner M, Clavein P. Failure of regeneration of the steatotic rat liver: disruption at two different levels in the regeneration pathway. Hepatology 2000;31(1):35–42

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Yang SQ, et al. Disrupted signaling and inhibited regeneration in obese mice with fatty livers: implications for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease pathophysiology. Hepatology 2001;34(4 Pt 1):694–706

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Pauta M, et al. Impaired liver regeneration in Ldlr−/− mice is associated with an altered hepatic profile of cytokines, growth factors, and lipids. J Hepatol 2013;59(4):731–737

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Leclercq IA, Field J, Farrell GC. Leptin-specific mechanisms for impaired liver regeneration in ob/ob mice after toxic injury. Gastroenterology 2003;124(5):1451–1464

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Leclercq IA, et al. Defective hepatic regeneration after partial hepatectomy in leptin-deficient mice is not rescued by exogenous leptin. Lab Investig 2006;86(11):1161–1171

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Picard C, et al. Steatosis is not sufficient to cause an impaired regenerative response after partial hepatectomy in rats. J Hepatol 2002;36(5):645–652

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Zhao J, et al. NAFLD induction delays postoperative liver regeneration of ALPPS in rats. Dig Dis Sci 2019;64(2):456–468

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Murata H, et al. Mechanism of impaired regeneration of fatty liver in mouse partial hepatectomy model. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22(12):2173–2180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    DeAngelis RA, et al. A high-fat diet impairs liver regeneration in C57BL/6 mice through overexpression of the NF-kappaB inhibitor IkappaBalpha. Hepatology 2005;42(5):1148–1157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Newberry EP, et al. Altered hepatic triglyceride content after partial hepatectomy without impaired liver regeneration in multiple murine genetic models. Hepatology 2008;48(4):1097–1105

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Hamano M, et al. Lipid overloading during liver regeneration causes delayed hepatocyte DNA replication by increasing ER stress in mice with simple hepatic steatosis. J Gastroenterol 2014;49(2):305–316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Gazit V, et al. Liver regeneration is impaired in lipodystrophic fatty liver dystrophy mice. Hepatology 2010;52(6):2109–2117

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Aravinthan A, et al. Hepatocyte senescence predicts progression in non-alcohol-related fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2013;58(3):549–556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Aravinthan A, et al. Gene polymorphisms of cellular senescence marker p21 and disease progression in non-alcohol-related fatty liver disease. Cell Cycle 2014;13(9):1489–1494

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Gentric G, et al. Oxidative stress promotes pathologic polyploidization in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Investig 2015;125(3):981–992

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Ritschka B, et al. The senotherapeutic drug ABT-737 disrupts aberrant p21 expression to restore liver regeneration in adult mice. Genes Dev 2020;34(7–8):489–494

    Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Rivadeneira DB, et al. Proliferative suppression by CDK4/6 inhibition: complex function of the retinoblastoma pathway in liver tissue and hepatoma cells. Gastroenterology 2010;138(5):1920–1930

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Conner EA, et al. Dual functions of E2F–1 in a transgenic mouse model of liver carcinogenesis. Oncogene 2000;19(44):5054–5062

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Denechaud PD, et al. E2F1 mediates sustained lipogenesis and contributes to hepatic steatosis. J Clin Investig 2016;126(1):137–150

    Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Liao Y, et al. Delayed hepatocellular mitotic progression and impaired liver regeneration in early growth response-1-deficient mice. J Biol Chem 2004;279(41):43107–43116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Zellmer S, et al. Transcription factors ETF, E2F, and SP-1 are involved in cytokine-independent proliferation of murine hepatocytes. Hepatology 2010;52(6):2127–2136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Fajas L. Re-thinking cell cycle regulators: the cross-talk with metabolism. Front Oncol 2013;3:4

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Inoue Y, et al. Induction of p53-dependent p21 limits proliferative activity of rat hepatocytes in the presence of hepatocyte growth factor. PLoS ONE 2013;8(11):e78346

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Inoue Y, et al. p53 May positively regulate hepatocyte proliferation in rats. Hepatology 2002;36(2):336–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Prokesch A, et al. Liver p53 is stabilized upon starvation and required for amino acid catabolism and gluconeogenesis. FASEB J 2017;31(2):732–742

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Kung CP, et al. The P72R polymorphism of p53 predisposes to obesity and metabolic dysfunction. Cell Rep 2016;14(10):2413–2425

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Tomita K, et al. p53/p66Shc-mediated signaling contributes to the progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in humans and mice. J Hepatol 2012;57(4):837–843

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by Lund University. We thank all present and past members of the Kaldis laboratory for discussions, input, and support. We also thank the administrative staff from the Host Defense Laboratory and the Immunology Frontiers Research Center for their support.

Funding

The work was supported by the Faculty of Medicine, Lund University to PK and by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (19K166930), the Research Grant from Takeda Science Foundation and Immunology Frontiers Research Center core funding, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan to MJC.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matias J. Caldez or Philipp Kaldis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Matias J. Caldez, Mikael Bjorklund and Philipp Kaldis declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lead Contact: Philipp Kaldis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caldez, M.J., Bjorklund, M. & Kaldis, P. Cell cycle regulation in NAFLD: when imbalanced metabolism limits cell division. Hepatol Int (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-020-10066-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Liver regeneration
  • Cell signaling
  • Metabolism
  • Cell cycle
  • NAFLD
  • Oxidation
  • Biosynthesis
  • Lipids
  • NASH
  • Senescence