Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Energy consumption laxity-based quorum selection for distributed object-based systems

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In object based systems, an object is an unit of computation resource. Distributed applications are composed of multiple objects. Objects in an application are replicated to multiple servers in order to increase reliability, availability, and performance. On the other hand, the large amount of electric energy is consumed in a system compared with non-replication systems since multiple replicas of each object are manipulated on multiple servers. In this paper, the energy consumption laxity-based quorum selection (ECLBQS) algorithm is proposed to construct a quorum for each method issued by a transaction so that the total electric energy consumption of servers to perform methods can be reduced in the quorum based locking protocol. The total electric energy consumption of servers, the average execution time of each transaction, and the number of aborted transactions are shown to be more reduced in the ECLBQS algorithm than the random algorithm in evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDS) (2014) Data center efficiency assessment—scaling up energy efficiency across the data center industry: evaluating key drivers and barriers. http://www.nrdc.org/energy/files/data-center-efficiency-assessment-IP.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2015

  2. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDS) (2012) Is cloud computing always greener? Finding the most energy and carbon efficient information technology solutions for small- and medium-sized organizations. http://www.nrdc.org/energy/files/cloud-computing-efficiency-IB.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2015

  3. Enokido T, Duolikun D, Takizawa M (2015) An extended improved redundant power consumption laxity-based (EIRPCLB) algorithm for energy efficient server cluster systems. World Wide Web 18(6):1629–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomimori M, Sugawara S (2017) Content sharing method using expected acquisition rate in hybrid peer-to-peer networks with cloud storages. Int J Space Based Situated Comput 7(4):187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka K, Hasegawa K, Takizawa M (2000) Quorum-based replication in object-based systems. J Inf Sci Eng 16(3):317–331

    Google Scholar 

  6. Object Management Group Inc. (2012) Common object request broker architecture (CORBA) specification, version 3.3, Part 1—Interfaces. http://www.omg.org/spec/CORBA/3.3/Interfaces/PDF. Accessed 24 Apr 2017

  7. Bernstein PA, Hadzilacos V, Goodman N (1987) Concurrency control and recovery in database systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider FB (1993) Replication management using the state-machine approach. Distributed systems, 2nd edn. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray JN (1978) Notes on database operating systems. Lect Notes Comput Sci 60:393–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Molina H, Barbara D (1985) How to assign votes in a distributed system. J ACM 32(4):814–860

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan S, Kolodziej J, Li J, Zomaya AY (2013) Evolutionary based solutions for green computing. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Serhan Z, Diab WB (2016) Energy efficient QoS routing and adaptive status update in WMSNs. Int J Space Based Situated Comput 6(3):129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qu X, Peng X (2017) An energy-efficient virtual machine scheduler based on CPU share-reclaiming policy. Int J Grid Util Comput (IJGUC) 6(2):113–120

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Intel Corporation (2010) Intel Xeon Processor 5600 Series: the next generation of intelligent server processors. http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-5600-brief.html. Accessed 24 Apr 2017

  15. Kaushik A, Vidyarthi DP (2018) A hybrid heuristic resource allocation model for computational grid for optimal energy usage. Int J Grid Util Comput (IJGUC) 9(1):51–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kataoka H, Nakamura S, Duolikun D, Enokido T, Takizawa M (2017) Multi-level power consumption model and energy-aware server selection algorithm. Int J Grid Util Comput (IJGUC) 8(3):201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duolikun D, Enokido T, Takizawa M (2017) An energy-aware algorithm to migrate virtual machines in a server cluster. Int J Grid Util Comput (IJGUC) 7(1):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sawada A, Kataoka H, Duolikun D, Enokido T, Takizawa M (2016) Energy-aware clusters of servers for storage and computation applications. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA-2016), pp 400–407

  19. Enokido T, Aikebaier A, Takizawa M (2010) A model for reducing power consumption in peer-to-peer systems. IEEE Syst J 4(2):221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Enokido T, Aikebaier A, Takizawa M (2011) Process allocation algorithms for saving power consumption in peer-to-peer systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(6):2097–2105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Enokido T, Aikebaier A, Takizawa M (2014) An extended simple power consumption model for selecting a server to perform computation type processes in digital ecosystems. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 10(2):1627–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Enokido T, Takizawa M (2013) Integrated power consumption model for distributed systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 60(2):824–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Enokido T, Takizawa M (2013) The evaluation of the extended transmission power consumption (ETPC) model to perform communication type processes. Computing 95(10–11):1019–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business Administration, Rissho University, 4-2-16, Osaki, Shinagawa, Tokyo, 141-8602, Japan

    Tomoya Enokido

  2. Department of Advanced Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, 3-7-2, Kajino-cho, Koganei-shi, Tokyo, 184-8584, Japan

    Dilawaer Duolikun & Makoto Takizawa

Authors
  1. Tomoya Enokido
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dilawaer Duolikun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Makoto Takizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoya Enokido.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Enokido, T., Duolikun, D. & Takizawa, M. Energy consumption laxity-based quorum selection for distributed object-based systems. Evol. Intel. 13, 71–82 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-018-0157-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-018-0157-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation