Energy cost savings and expected payback for Re-tuning the controls of US Army buildings

Abstract

The Headquarters Department of the Army sponsored a study to determine the national impact of deploying the Re-tuning™ (“Re-tuning” is a trademark of the US Department of Energy) methodology in five building types that account for over 40% of the Army’s conditioned building stock. Re-tuning is a systematic process that improves operational efficiency and reduces energy consumption at no or low cost through the building automation system by correcting operational problems that plague buildings. The study relied on successful demonstration of the Re-tuning methodology at four pilot US Army installations that informed a holistic effort, including simulating 12 individual Re-tuning energy efficiency measures (EEMs) and six packages of EEMs in five selected Army building prototype models that represent 311 million ft2 (28.9 million m2) of the Army’s conditioned floor space. Both the baseline buildings and the packages were customized to capture the expected outcomes of Re-tuning a diverse set of buildings. The study highlighted the benefit of individual Re-tuning EEMs and economics of implementing packages of EEMs in applicable Army buildings across 16 climates and two building vintages. The average whole-building energy savings ranged from 10.8 to 40.5% by building type, with the company operations facility building having the highest value proposition from Re-tuning. In addition, the study revealed that all large office buildings in the Army are economical to Re-tuning. The total modeled cost savings potential for Re-tuning the five building types across the US Army is $204/1000 ft2 ($220/100 m2) or $64 M annually. This cost savings represent 5.6% of all the Army’s energy expenditures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. 1.

    Based on a contracted cost of $50,000 per building and a required simple payback of 5 years.

  2. 2.

    Assuming the size of the buildings match the size of the prototype models (described in Table 1)

References

  1. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. (1989). Energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings. Atlanta: ASHRAE standard 90.1–1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. (2004). Energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings. Atlanta: ASHRAE standard 90.1–2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beck, A., & Gohner, P. (2012). An approach for model-based energy cost analysis of industrial automation systems. Energy Efficiency, 5(3), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brambley, M. R., & Katipamula, S. (2009). Commercial building re-tuning: a low-cost approach to improved performance and energy efficiency. ASHRAE Journal, 51(10), 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brambley, M. R., Hansen, D., Haves, P., Holmberg, D. R., McDonald, S. C., Roth, K. W., & Torcellini, P. (2005). Advanced sensors and controls for building applications: Market assessment and potential R&D pathways. Richland: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory PNNL-15149.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Claridge, D. E., Liu, M., Zhu, Y., Abbas, M., Athar, A., Haberl, J. S. (1996). Implementation of continuous commissioning in the Texas LoanSTAR program: can you achieve 150% estimated retrofit savings revisited. Proceedings of the 1996 ACEEE Summer Study. ACEEE: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C.

  7. Claridge, D. E., Culp, C. H., Liu, M., Deng, S., Turner, W. D., and Haberl, J. S. (2000). Campus-wide continuous commissioningSMof university buildings. Proceedings of the 2000 ACEEE summer study. ACEEE: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC.

  8. Energy Information Administration. (2012). Commercial buildings energy consumption survey (CBECS) building characteristics summary tables. Washington D.C: Department of Energy https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/2012/index.php?view=characteristics#b1-b2. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Energy Information Administration. (2018). Annual energy outlook 2018. Washington D.C.: Department of Energy See Table 2. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/. Accessed 6 Mar 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandez, N., Katipamula, S., Wang, W., Huang, Y., & Liu, G. (2014). Energy savings modelling of re-tuning energy conservation measures in large office buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation., 8(6), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2014.961032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandez, N., Katipamula, S., Wang, W., Xie, Y., Zhao, M., & Corbin, C. (2017a). Impacts of commercial building controls on energy savings and peak load reduction. Richland: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory PNNL-25985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandez, N., Taasevigen, D., & Underhill, R. M. (2017b). Success of commercial building retuning in federal buildings: results and case studies. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 23(1).

  13. Granderson, J., & Lin, G. (2016). Building energy information systems: synthesis of costs, savings, and best-practice uses. Energy Efficiency, 9(6), 1369–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Granderson, J., Piette, M. A., & Ghatikar, G. (2011). Building energy information systems: user case studies. Energy Efficiency, 4(1), 17–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Katipamula, S. (2016). Improving commercial building operations through building re-tuning: meta-analysis. http://buildingretuning.pnnl.gov/documents/pnnl_sa_110686.pdf. Accessed July 2017.

  16. Katipamula, S. (2017). ASHRAE Webcast: using analytics to drive building performance. http://buildingretuning.pnnl.gov/documents/ASHRAE_2017_Webcast_Overview_and_Case_Study.pdf. Accessed July 2017.

  17. Katipamula, S. & Brambley, M. R. (2008). Transforming the practices of building operation and maintenance professionals: a Washington State pilot program. Proceedings of the 2008 ACEEE summer study. ACEEE: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C.

  18. Liu, M., Claridge, D. E., & Turner, W. D. (2002). Continuous commissioning SM guidebook. Federal energy management program. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

  19. Liu, M., Claridge, D. E., & Turner, W. D. (2003). Continuous commissioningSM of building energy systems. Special issue on emerging trends in building design, diagnosis and operation. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 125(3), 275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Manic, M., Wijayasekara, D., Amarasinghe, K., & Rodriguez-Andina, J. J. (2016). Building energy management systems: the age of intelligent and adaptive buildings. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 10(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marinakis, V., Doukas, H., Karakosta, C., & Psarras, J. (2013). An integrated system for buildings’ energy-efficient automation: application in the tertiary sector. Applied Energy, 101, 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mills, E. (2009). Building commissioning: a golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Piette, M. A., Kiliccote, S., & Dudly, J. H. (2013). Field demonstration of automated demand response for both winter and summer events in large buildings in the Pacific Northwest. Energy Efficiency, 6(4), 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stluka, P., Parthasarathy, G., Gabel, S., & Samad, T. (2018). Architectures for building automation – an industry view. In J. Wen & S. Mishra (Eds.), Intelligent Building Control Systems. Advances in Industrial Control. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  25. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2011). ERDC – CERL, NREL, PNNL: MILCON Energy Efficiency and Sustainability Study of Five Types of Army Buildings.

  26. U.S. Department of Defense. (2019). Annual energy management and resilience report fiscal year 2018. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/IE/FEP_Energy_Reports.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  27. U.S. Department of Energy (2012). EnergyPlus Energy Simulation Software: U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Office. http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/. Accessed March 13, 2017.

  28. Wang, X., Habeeb, R., Ou, X., Amaravdi, S., Hatcliff, J., Mizuno, M., Neilsen, M., Raj Rajagopalan, S., & Varadarajan, S. (2017). Enhanced security of building automation systems through microkernel-based controller platforms. IEEE 37th international conference on distributed computing systems workshops, Atlanta, Georgia.

  29. Yang, R., & Wang, L. (2013). Development of multi-agent system for building energy and comfort management based on occupant behaviors. Energy and Buildings, 56, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, X., Pipattanasomporn, M., Kuzlu, M., & Rahman, S. (2016). Conceptual framework for a multi-building peak load management system. IEEE PES innovative smart grid technologies conference Europe, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Fernandez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernandez, N., Taasevigen, D., Boyd, B. et al. Energy cost savings and expected payback for Re-tuning the controls of US Army buildings. Energy Efficiency 13, 835–851 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09852-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Army
  • Buildings
  • Simulation
  • Controls
  • Re-tuning
  • Savings