Building analytics and monitoring-based commissioning: industry practice, costs, and savings


As building energy and system-level monitoring becomes more common, facility teams are faced with an overwhelming amount of data. This data does not typically lead to insights, corrective actions, and energy savings unless it is stored, organized, analyzed, and prioritized in automated ways. The Smart Energy Analytics Campaign is a public-private sector partnership program focused on supporting commercially available energy management and information systems (EMIS) technology use and monitoring-based commissioning (MBCx) practices. MBCx is an ongoing commissioning process with focus on analyzing large amounts of data on a continuous basis. EMIS tools are used in the MBCx process to organize, present, visualize, and analyze the data. With campaign data from over 400 million square feet (sq. ft.) of installed space, this paper presents the results achieved by owners that are implementing EMIS, along with associated technology costs. The study’s EMIS users that reported savings achieved the median cost savings of $0.19/sq. ft. and 7% annually, with savings shown to increase over time. For 35 portfolio owners, the median base cost to install an EMIS was $0.03/sq. ft., with an annual recurring software cost of $0.02/sq. ft. and an estimated annual labor cost of $0.03/sq. ft. Two types of EMIS systems—energy information systems and fault detection and diagnostic systems—are defined in the body of the paper. Of the two, we find that fault detection and diagnostic systems have both higher savings and higher costs. The paper offers a characterization of EMIS products, MBCx services, and trends in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9


  1. 1.

    Success stories are short case studies on those participants that received recognition by the U.S. Department of Energy. The success stories are available for download at


  1. ASHRAE (2013). ASHRAE standard 202-2013. Commissioning process for buildings and systems. American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers.

  2. Building Commissioning Association (2018). The Building Commissioning Association best practices in commissioning existing buildings. Accessed 6 Nov 2018.

  3. Fernandes, S., Granderson, J., Singla, R., & Touzani, S. (2018). Corporate delivery of a global smart buildings program. Energy Engineering Jan 1;115(1):7–25.

  4. Fernandez, N., et al. (2017). Impacts on commercial building controls on energy savings and peak load reduction. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. PNNL Report Number PNNL-25985.

  5. Granderson, J., & Lin, G. (2016). Building energy information systems: synthesis of costs, savings, and best-practice uses. Energy Efficiency, 9(6), 1369–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Granderson, J., Singla, R., Mayhorn, E., Erlich, P., Vrabie, D., & Frank, S. (2017). Characteristics and survey of automated fault detection and diagnostic tools. LBNL-2001075.

  7. Granderson, J., Lin, G., & Fernandes, S. (2015). A primer on organizational use of EMIS. Prepared for the U.S. DOE Better Buildings Program.

  8. Henderson, P., & Waltner, M. (2013). Real-time Energy management: a case study of three large commercial buildings in Washington, D.C. Natural Resources Defense Council. October. CS:13-07-A.

  9. Katipamula, S., & Brambley, M. (2005). Methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systems – a review, part 1. HVAC&R Research, 11(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kramer, H., Lin, G., Granderson, J., Curtin, C., & Crowe, E. (2018). Moving beyond data paralysis to effective use of building analytics. Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study.

  11. Mills, E., & Mathew, P. (2009). Monitoring based commissioning: benchmarking analysis of 24 UC/CSU/IOU projects. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-1972E.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roth, K. W., Westphalen, D., Feng, M. Y., Llana, P., & Quartararo, L. (2005). Energy impact of commercial building controls and performance diagnostics: market characterization, energy impact of building faults and energy savings potential. Report prepared by TIAX LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy.

  13. Smart Energy Analytics Campaign (2018). Smart energy analytics campaign. Accessed on March 15, 2018.

  14. Stum, K., & Bjornskov, D. 2017. The building commissioning handbook third edition. Published by the Building Commissioning Association and APPA. Chapter 5: Ongoing Commissioning. 169–222.

  15. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018). Electric Power Monthly. Table ES1.B. February 2018. Accessed February 14, 2019.

  16. U.S. Energy Information Administration Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS). Released May 2016. Table C1.. Accessed February 14, 2019.

  17. U.S. Energy Information Administration Natural Gas. Release date 1/31/2019. Accessed February 14, 2019.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah Kramer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kramer, H., Lin, G., Curtin, C. et al. Building analytics and monitoring-based commissioning: industry practice, costs, and savings. Energy Efficiency 13, 537–549 (2020).

Download citation


  • EMIS
  • Fault detection and diagnostics
  • Energy information system
  • Energy management
  • Building energy monitoring