Advertisement

Investigating the energy efficiencies of European countries with super efficiency model and super SBM approaches

  • Fazıl Gökgöz
  • Ercem Erkul
Original Article
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

The scarcity of primary energy sources and depletion of the world’s fossil fuel reserves combined with wildly fluctuating energy prices in recent years have posed financial, cyclical, and environmental problems for European countries. These countries have a promising energy sector within the global energy markets, and measuring their technical efficiencies is of great importance. The goal of this study is to find and compare the efficiency scores of European countries and regions for the period of 2011–2015 using super efficiency and super slack-based measure (super SBM) data envelopment analysis (DEA) models. The empirical results revealed that efficiency scores of Eastern Europe, Baltic States, and the European Union-13 (EU-13) have remained lower than the efficiency scores registered for Northern Europe, Western Europe, Southern Europe, Scandinavia, and the European Union-15 (EU-15) for the same period. Besides, Greece, Luxembourg, Norway, and Denmark have been found efficient for the whole period. Additionally, SBM model analyses have shown better results in comparison to super efficiency approach. In conclusion, both the efficiency results and policy recommendations for the European countries and regions would provide valuable contribution to the decision-making processes in terms of energy policies.

Keywords

Energy efficiency Super efficiency Super SBM European energy markets 

References

  1. Adler, N., Friedman, L., & Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2002). Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research, 140(2), 249–265.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Refaie, A., Hammad, M., Li, M. H. 2016. DEA window analysis and Malmquist index to assess energy efficiency and productivity in Jordanian industrial sector. Energy Efficiency, 1–15.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Ang, B. W. (2006). Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: From energy–GDP ratio to composite efficiency index. Energy Policy, 34(5), 574–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagdadioglu, N., Waddams Price, C. M., & Weyman-Jones, T. G. (1996). Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: A non-parametric model of the Turkish experience. Energ. Econ., 18(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bampatsou, C., Papadopoulos, S., & Zervas, E. (2013). Technical efficiency of economic systems of EU-15 countries based on energy consumption. Energy Policy, 55, 426–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Bi, G. B., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66, 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bian, Y., & Yang, F. (2010). Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: A DEA approach based on Shannon’s entropy. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1909–1917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boonekamp, P. G. M. (2011). How much will the energy service directive contribute to the 20% EU energy savings goal? Energy Efficiency., 4, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, M. C. (2015). Room for improvement in low carbon economies of G7 and BRICS countries based on the analysis of energy efficiency and environmental Kuznets curves. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, T. P., & Hu, J. L. (2010). Total-factor energy productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change: An empirical study of China. Applied Energy, 87(10), 3262–3270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, Y., & Du, J. (2015). Super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. In J. Zhu (Ed.), data envelopment analysis (pp. 381–414). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Chien, T., & Hu, J. L. (2007). Renewable energy and macroeconomic efficiency of OECD and non-OECD economies. Energ Policy, 35(7), 3606–3615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Commission of the European Communities, 1974. Towards a new energy policy strategy for the European community. 26 June, COM (74) 550 final/2, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses with DEA-solver software and references. New York: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. CVCE, 2012. Centre Virtuel de la Connaissance sur l’Europe (CVCE). http://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_european_communities-en-3940ef1d-7c10-4d0f-97fc-0cf1e86a32d4.html. Access date: 13.04.2015.
  19. Dyson, R. S., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245–249.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. EC TEP, 2011. The entry into force of the EU third energy package. European Commission Directorate – General for Energy.Google Scholar
  21. EU ETS. (2013). The EU emissions trading system (EU ETS). European Union Publications Office.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2012). Energy roadmap 2050. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  23. European Council. (2007). Presidency conclusions: Brussels European council 8–9 march, 7224/1/07 REV 1. Brussels: European Council.Google Scholar
  24. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. (1986). Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls. Resource and Energy Economics, 8(2), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency., 1, 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gökgöz, F. (2009). Data envelopment analysis for Turkish banks: Evidence on the financial efficiencies of commercial and investment banks. Banking and Finance Letters., 1(2), 39–46.Google Scholar
  27. Gökgöz, F., & Çandarlı, D. (2009). Data envelopment analysis: A comparative efficiency measurement for Turkish pension and mutual funds. International. Journal of Economic Perspectives., 3(3), 1–23.Google Scholar
  28. Gökgöz, F. (2010). Measuring the financial efficiencies and performances of Turkish funds. Acta Oeconomica., 60(3), 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gökgöz, F., Erkul, E., 2014. Energy efficiency analysis for the European countries. International Scientific Publications: Economy & Business Journal. 8, 124–140.Google Scholar
  30. Golany, B., Roll, Y., & Rybak, D. (1994). Measuring efficiency of power plants in Israel by data envelopment analysis. IEEE T. Eng. Manage., 41(3), 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harmelink, M., Nilsson, L., & Harmsen, R. (2008). Theory-based policy evaluation of 20 energy efficiency instruments. Energy Efficiency., 1, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, J., Diamond, R., Iyer, M., Payne, C., Blumstein, C., & Siderius, H. P. (2008). Towards a sustainable energy balance: Progressive efficiency and the return of energy conservation. Energy Efficiency., 1, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Honma, S., & Hu, J. L. (2008). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan. Energy Policy, 36(2), 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Honma, S., Hu, J.L., 2011. Industry-level total-factor energy efficiency in developed countries. Kyushu Sangyo University, Discussion Paper:51.Google Scholar
  35. Honma, S., & Hu, J. L. (2014). Industry-level total-factor energy efficiency in developed countries: A Japan-centered analysis. Applied Energy, 119, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hu, J. L., & Wang, S. C. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energ Policy, 34(17), 3206–3217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huang, J., Yang, X., Cheng, G., & Wang, S. (2014). A comprehensive eco-efficiency model and dynamics of regional eco-efficiency in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 67, 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. (2000). Benchmarking and regulation: International electricity experience. Utilities Policy, 9(3), 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kao, C., 2016. Network data envelopment analysis: Foundations and extensions (Vol. 240). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Langsdorf, S. (2011). EU energy policy: From the ECSC to the energy roadmap 2050. Heinrich Böll Stiftung: Green European Foundation, Brussels.Google Scholar
  41. Li, H., Fang, K., Yang, W., Wang, D., & Hong, X. (2013). Regional environmental efficiency evaluation in China: Analysis based on the super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5), 1018–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li, H., & Shi, J. F. (2014). Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors: An improved super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li, K., & Lin, B. (2015a). Measuring green productivity growth of Chinese industrial sectors during 1998–2011. China Economic Review, 36, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li, K., & Lin, B. (2015b). The improvement gap in energy intensity: Analysis of China's thirty provincial regions using the improved DEA (data envelopment analysis) model. Energy, 84, 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li, K., & Lin, B. (2017). Economic growth model, structural transformation, and green productivity in China. Applied Energy, 187, 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li, L., Chi, T., & Wang, S. (2016a). Is energy utilization among Chinese provinces sustainable? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li, T., Yang, W., Zhang, H., & Cao, X. (2016b). Evaluating the impact of transport investment on the efficiency of regional integrated transport systems in China. Transport Policy, 45, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miliotis, P. A. (1992). Data envelopment analysis applied to electricity distribution districts. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(5), 549–555.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Patterson, M. G. (1996). What is energy efficiency?: Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy, 24(5), 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pollitt, M. G. (1996). Ownership and efficiency in nuclear power production. Oxford Econ. Pap., 48(2), 342–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saen, R. F. (2008). Using super-efficiency analysis for ranking suppliers in the presence of volume discount offers. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(8), 637–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Song, M. L., Zhang, L. L., Liu, W., & Fisher, R. (2013). Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’ energy efficiency based on small sample data. Applied Energy, 112, 1049–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suzuki, S., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (2015). A target-oriented data envelopment analysis for energy-environment efficiency improvement in Japan. Energy Efficiency, 8(3), 433–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Suzuki, S., & Nijkamp, P. (2016). An evaluation of energy-environment-economic efficiency for EU, APEC and ASEAN countries: Design of a Target-Oriented DFM model with fixed factors in data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy, 88, 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Tone, K. (2002). A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 32–41.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. Tone, K. (2011). Slacks-based measure of efficiency. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis (pp. 195–209, New York). Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Vlontzos, G., Niavis, S., & Manos, B. (2014). A DEA approach for estimating the agricultural energy and environmental efficiency of EU countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang, Q., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. (2012). Efficiency measurement with carbon dioxide emissions: The case of China. Applied Energy, 90(1), 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wei, C. Y., Ni, J., & Shen, M. (2009). Empirical analysis of provincial energy efficiency in China. China & World Economy, 17(5), 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu, A. H., Cao, Y. Y., & Liu, B. (2014a). Energy efficiency evaluation for regions in China: An application of DEA and Malmquist indices. Energy Efficiency, 7(3), 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wu, H. Q., Shi, Y., Xia, Q., & Zhu, W. D. (2014b). Effectiveness of the policy of circular economy in China: A DEA-based analysis for the period of 11th five-year-plan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 83, 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wu, F., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. Q. (2016). Does there exist energy congestion? Empirical evidence from Chinese industrial sectors. Energy Efficiency, 9(2), 371–384.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Xiaoli, Z., Rui, Y., & Qian, M. (2014). China's total factor energy efficiency of provincial industrial sectors. Energy, 65, 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yue, S., Yang, Y., Shao, J., & Zhu, Y. (2016). International comparison of Total factor ecology efficiency: Focused on G20 from 1999–2013. Sustainability, 8(11), 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang, X. P., Cheng, X. M., Yuan, J. H., & Gao, X. J. (2011). Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energy Policy, 39(2), 644–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang, J., Xing, Z., & Wang, J. (2016a). Analysis of CO2 emission performance and abatement potential for municipal industrial sectors in Jiangsu, China. Sustainability, 8(7), 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang, J., Zeng, W., & Shi, H. (2016b). Regional environmental efficiency in China: Analysis based on a regional slack-based measure with environmental undesirable outputs. Ecological Indicators, 71, 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zheng Y., Qi, Z., 2010. Total factor energy efficiency of regions in China: a nonparametric analysis. Internation Conference on Management Science and Engineering. Management. 1422–1432. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2010.5719975. Access date: 13.04.2015.
  70. Zhou, P., & Ang, B. W. (2008). Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency. Energ Policy, 36(8), 2911–2916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2008). A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 1–18.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhu, J., 2014. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets (Vol. 213). Springer.Google Scholar
  73. Zografidou, E., Petridis, K., Arabatzis, G., & Dey, P. K. (2016). Optimal design of the renewable energy map of Greece using weighted goal-programming and data envelopment analysis. Computers & Operations Research, 66, 313–326.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. Zou, G., Chen, L., Liu, W., Hong, X., Zhang, G., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Measurement and evaluation of Chinese regional energy efficiency based on provincial panel data. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5), 1000–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of ManagementAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Social WorkHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations