Energy Efficiency

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 1193–1206 | Cite as

Analysis of electricity consumption: a study in the wood products industry

  • Henry Quesada-PinedaEmail author
  • Jan Wiedenbeck
  • Brian Bond
Original Article


This paper evaluates the effect of industry segment, year, and US region on electricity consumption per employee, per dollar sales, and per square foot of plant area for wood products industries. Data was extracted from the Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) database and imported into MS Excel. The extracted dataset was examined for outliers and abnormalities with outliers outside the quantile range 0.5–99.5 dropped from the analysis. A logarithmic transformation was applied to eliminate the skewness of the original data distributions. Correlation measurements indicated a moderate association between the response variables; therefore, a multivariate analysis of variance test was performed to measure the impact of the three factors: industry type, year, and region, simultaneously on all response variables. The results indicated some effect associated with all three factors on the three measures of electricity consumption. Subsequently, univariate ANOVA tests were conducted to determine the levels of the factors that were different. Most levels of industry type were associated with significantly different energy consumption, an expected result since some of the industries are more energy intensive than others. The industries in Standard Industry Code (SIC) 2493 (reconstituted wood products) are the groups with the highest electricity consumption with means of 38,096.28 kWh/employee, 0.86 kWh/sales, and 154.14 kWh/plant area while industries grouped in SIC 2451 (mobile homes) have the smallest consumption with means of 6811.01 kWh/employee, 0.05 kWh/sales, and 9.45 kWh/plant area. Interestingly, differences in regional consumption were found to be linked to the proportion of industry types by region. Data analysis also indicated differences in electricity consumption per employee for the factor year, but for the other response variables, no differences were found. These main results indicate that industries in the wood products sector have different electricity consumption rates depending on the type of manufacturing processes they use. Therefore, industries in this sector can use these comparisons and metrics to benchmark their electricity consumption as well to understand better how electricity costs might vary depending on the region they are located.


Energy usage Wood products Energy performance metrics 



This work was funded through a cooperative agreement (13-JV-11242301-080) with the US Forest Service and The Department of Sustainable Biomaterials at Virginia Tech


  1. Abadie, L. M., Ortiz, R. A., & Galarraga, I. (2012). Determinants of energy efficiency investments in the US. Energy Policy, 45, 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alhourani, F., & Saxena, U. (2009). Factors affecting the implementation rates of energy and productivity recommendations in small and medium sized companies. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 28(1), 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beyene, A., & Moman, A. (2006). Process oriented industrial classification based on energy intensity. Applied Thermal Engineering, 26(17/18), 2079–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowyer, J., Bratkovich, S., and Fernholz, K. (2012). Utilization of harvested wood by the North American forest products industry. Report. Dovetail Partners, Inc. Minneapolis, MN. 23 pp. Accessed 21 Oct 2014.
  5. Buehlmann, U., Bumgardner, M., Schuler, A., & Barford, M. (2007). Assessing the impacts of global competition on the Appalachian hardwood industry. Forest Product Journal, 57(3), 89–94.Google Scholar
  6. Center for Advanced Energy Systems (CAES). (2014). Industrial assessment centers database. Accessed 11 Aug 2014.
  7. Devaru, D. G., Maddula, R., Grushecky, S. T., & Gopalakrishnan, B. (2014). Motor-based energy consumption in West Virginia Sawmills. Forest Products Journal, 64(1/2), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunning, S., and Ward, T. 1998. Energy and waste saving measures for the paper and wood products industry. Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference, Conference Record of 1998 Annual. IEEE. Pages 80–86. 21–26 June. Portland, ME.Google Scholar
  9. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2013). Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey. Accessed 16 Dec 2015.
  10. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2014). Annual energy outlook 2014 early release overview. Accessed 24 Mar 2015.
  11. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2014) Manufacturing energy consumption survey. ( Accessed 28 Jan 2015.
  12. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2007). Energy trends in selected manufacturing sectors: opportunities and challenges for environmentally preferable energy outcomes. Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation. Accessed 13 Jan 2015.
  13. Espinoza, O., Bond, B. H., & Buehlmann, U. (2011a). Energy and the U.S. hardwood industry—part 1: responses to increasing prices. Bioresources, 6(4), 3883–3898.Google Scholar
  14. Espinoza, O., Bond, B. H., & Buehlmann, U. (2011b). Energy and the U.S. hardwood industry—part 2: profile and impact of prices. Bioresources, 6(4), 3899–3914.Google Scholar
  15. French, A., Macedo, M., Poulsen, J., Waterson, T., and Yu, A. (2008). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). San Francisco State University. Accessed 9 Mar 2015..
  16. Gopalakrishnan, B., Mate, A., Mardikar, Y., Gupta, D. P., Plummer, R. W., & Anderson, B. (2005). Energy efficiency measures in the wood manufacturing industry. Proceedings of the 2005 ACEEE (American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy) Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry on CD ROM, ISBN 0-918249-54-6, West Point, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Gopalakrishnan, B., Mardikar, Y., Gupta, D., Mohammad Jalali, S., & Chaudhari, S. (2012). Establishing baseline electrical energy consumption in wood processing sawmills for lean energy initiatives: a model based on energy analysis and diagnostics. Energy Engineering, 109(5), 40–80.Google Scholar
  18. Heymann, D. (2005). Pacific Northwest efficient-energy initiatives. Environmental Quality Management, 15(2), 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howell, D. C. (2007). Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  20. Industrial Assessment Center (IAC). 2015. IAC Database. Accessed 11 Nov 2015.
  21. Lehman, A., O’Rourke, N., Hatcher, L., & Stepanski, E. (2013). JMP for basic univariate and multivariate statistics. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Lin, W., Wang, W., Shawn, G., David, S., and Gopalakrishnan, B. (2012). Energy consumption and efficiency of Appalachian Harwood Mills, Forest Products Journal, 62(1):32--38.Google Scholar
  23. Meil, J., Bushi, L., Garrahan, P., Aston, R., Gingras, A., and Elustondo, D. (2009). Status of energy use in the Canadian wood products sector. Final Report for Project No. 6014. FPInnovations –Forintek, Vancouver, BC CANADA 53 p.Google Scholar
  24. Nyboer, J., and Bennett, M. (2013). Energy use and related DATA: Canadian wood products industry 1990, 1995 to 2011. Canadian Industrial Energy End-use Data and Analysis Centre (CIEEDAC). Accessed 29 Jan 2015.
  25. Pellegrino, J., Margolis, N., Justiniano, M., and Miller, M. (2004). Energy use, loss and opportunities analysis. Department of Energy. Accessed 29 Jan 2015.
  26. Qiu, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2015). Implied discount rate and payback threshold of energy efficiency investment in the industrial sector. Applied Economics, 47(21), 2218–2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quesada-Pineda, H.J. and Buehlmann, U. (2011). Lean thinking: examples and applications in the wood products industry. Virginia Cooperative Extension (Peer-reviewed article 420–002) November, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  28. Tonn, B., & Martin, M. (2000). Industrial energy efficiency decision making. Energy Policy, 28, 12–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. United States Census Bureau. (2013). Annual survey of manufacturers: value of products shipments: value of shipments for products classes, Table AM1331VS101; generated by Jan Wiedenbeck; using American <>. Accessed 04 Aug 2015.
  30. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service. (2015). Forest service regions. Accessed 30 Mar 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Quesada-Pineda
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jan Wiedenbeck
    • 2
  • Brian Bond
    • 1
  1. 1.Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Forest ServicePrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations