Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energising households: a financial analysis of incentivised energy efficiency measures in remote Australia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Governments in developed economies are making considerable investments in energy efficiency technologies and encouraging residential households to conserve energy. A major programme in Australia has invested A$280 million to encourage residential households to become more energy aware and make additional investment in energy efficiency measures. This paper examines the adoption of energy efficiency measures by residential households participating in this programme in a geographically remote Australian town. It uses data collected by the programme developers. It examines the financial return of the investment in terms of payback period and internal rate of return. It then discusses the financial return with respect to adoption of a range of products offered by the programme. Results show that adoption of energy efficiency measures by households was not solely guided by rational economic-maximising principles. For example, some frequently adopted measures had negative financial effectiveness. A range of important determining factors are discussed, and the consequent impact this has for analysis of the effectiveness of incentive programmes. Finally, this paper proposes considerations for future programmes to more effectively measure and target efficient adoption of energy efficient measures, both in remote and non-remote residential settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS (2011). Australian Bureau of Statistics web site [WWW Document]. Alice Springs T Local Gov. Area Census Data. URL http://www.abs.gov.au/ (accessed 11.5.13).

  • Alice Solar City (2014) Alice Solar City 2008-2013 Report, Final Report. http://www.alicesolarcity.com.au/sites/default/files/Alice_Solar_City_Report_2008-2013%20FINAL%20for%20web.pd.

  • Brandon, G., & Lewis, A. (1999). Reducing household energy consumption: a qualitative and quantitative field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 75–85. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. (2013). Energy efficiency policy puzzles. The Energy Journal, 34.

  • Bruderer Enzler, H., Diekmann, A., & Meyer, R. (2014). Subjective discount rates in the general population and their predictive power for energy saving behavior. Energy Policy, 65, 524–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinch, J. P., & Healy, J. D. (2000). Cost-benefit analysis of domestic energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 29, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCanio, S. J. (1998). The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments. Energy Policy, 26, 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devabhaktuni, V., Alam, M., Shekara Sreenadh Reddy Depuru, S., Green, R. C., II, Nims, D., & Near, C. (2013). Solar energy: trends and enabling technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 555–564. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Rue du Can, S., Leventis, G., Phadke, A., Gopal, A. (2014). Design of incentive programs for accelerating penetration of energy-efficient appliances. Energy Policy, 72, 56–66. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.035.

  • Dubin, J. A., & McFadden, D. L. (1984). An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica, 52, 345–362.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gamtessa, S. F. (2013). An explanation of residential energy-efficiency retrofit behavior in Canada. Energy and Buildings, 57, 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 335–362. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, K., Newell, R., & Palmer, K. (2006). Energy efficiency policies: a retrospective examination. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 161–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. B., Haddad, B. M., & Paton, B. (2000). The economics of energy efficiency: insights from voluntary participation programs. Energy Policy, 28, 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2013). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion, edition released on 19 November 2013. doi:10.5257/iea/co2/2013.

  • Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2004). Economics of energy efficiency. In C. J. Cleveland (Ed.), Encyclopedia of energy (pp. 79–90). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob, M. (2006). Marginal costs and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments: the case of the Swiss residential sector. Energy Policy, 34, 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefley, F. (1996). The payback method of investment appraisal: a review and synthesis. International Journal of Production Economics, 44, 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. D., Koomey, J. G., McMahon, J. E., Sanstad, A. H., & Hirst, E. (1995). Energy efficiency policy and market failures. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 20, 535–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallaburn, P. S., & Eyre, N. (2014). Lessons from energy efficiency policy and programmes in the UK from 1973 to 2013. Energy Efficiency, 7, 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, M. (2013). Pre-payment meters and energy efficiency in indigenous households. Report by Bushlight, the Centre for Appropriate Technology: Alice Springs, Northern Territory.

  • Mishan, E. J. (1972). Elements of cost-benefit analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, G. (1990). Investment appraisal for managers. England: Gower Publishing Co. LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundaca, L., Neij, L., Worrell, E., & McNeil, M. (2010). Evaluating energy efficiency policies with energy-economy models. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 305–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, M. J. (2010). A resolution to the NPV-IRR debate? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50, 234–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister’s Task Group on Energy Efficiency (PMTGEE) (2010). Task group’s full report to the Australian Government. Report to Northern Territory Government by the Australian PV Association.

  • Rosenow, J., Platt, R., & Flanagan, B. (2013). Fuel poverty and energy efficiency obligations—A critical assessment of the supplier obligation in the UK. Energy Policy, 62, 1194–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanstad, A.H., Howarth, R.B. (1994). Consumer rationality and energy efficiency. Proceedings ACEEE Summer Study Energy Efficiency in Buildings, (pp. 175–183). Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

  • Santamouris, M. (2001). Euroclass: a European method for the experimental evaluation and classification of residential buildings. In: Proceedings of the presentation of SAVE project on energy legislation in the building sector. Athens, Greece. 25 July 2001.

  • Scott, S. (1997). Household energy efficiency in Ireland: a replication study of ownership of energy saving items. Energy Economics, 19, 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L. (2008). Promoting household energy conservation. Energy Policy, 36, 4449–4453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G., Gnoth, D., Lawson, R., & Thorsnes, P. (2010). Energy cultures: a framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy, 38, 6120–6129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada, K., Akimoto, K., Sano, F., Oda, J., & Homma, T. (2012). Energy efficiency opportunities in the residential sector and their feasibility. Energy, 48, 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.PCAP.KG.OE World Bank. 2009–2012. Energy use (kg of oil equivalent per capita). Data retrieved 21 February 2014 from World Bank: World Development Indicators database.

  • Wyld Group (2011). Mid-term review of the solar cities program. Commonwealth Government, Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.

  • Zahedi, A. (2010). Australian renewable energy progress. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 2208–2213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was conducted using a methodology approved by the Charles Darwin University’s Human Research Ethics Committee (approved application H13039). The authors would like to acknowledge the Alice Springs Town Council for their support of this project and are also grateful to the referees whose careful reviews led to improvements in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Havas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Havas, L., Ballweg, J., Penna, C. et al. Energising households: a financial analysis of incentivised energy efficiency measures in remote Australia. Energy Efficiency 8, 951–962 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9326-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9326-6

Keywords

Navigation