Advertisement

Energy Efficiency

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 743–759 | Cite as

Russian energy efficiency accounting system

  • Igor Bashmakov
  • Anna MyshakEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This paper was developed to evaluate the effectiveness of energy efficiency policies recently launched in the Russian Federation. Pilot applications in 2011–2013 of the energy efficiency and energy savings accounting system in Russia and energy consumption growth decomposition analysis developed in this paper have shown that (1) its creation is possible even when using a noncomprehensive statistical database; (2) its application provides nontrivial results and shows that the impressive GDP energy intensity decline in the period 2000–2012 was mostly (to 64 %) driven by structural and other factors with limited contribution of technological ones failing to bridge the technological gap with advanced economies. Facing slowing economic growth in years to come, the federal policy to improve energy efficiency is to be focused on providing incentives for more dynamic penetration of energy-efficient technologies to improve the Russian economy, competitiveness, and energy security.

Keywords

Energy efficiency accounting system Energy efficiency indicators Energy intensity Energy productivity Decomposition analysis 

References

  1. ADEME. (2009). Energy efficiency trends and policies in the household & tertiary sectors in the EU 27. Paris: ADEME Editions.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, B. W., & Choi, K. H. (1997). Decomposition of aggregate energy and gas emission intensities for industry: a refined Divisia index method. The Energy Journal, 18(3), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang, B. W., & Choi, K. H. (2010). Accounting frameworks for tracking energy efficiency trends. Energy Economics, 32(2010), 1209–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ang, B. W., & Choi, K. H. (2012). Attribution of changes in Divisia real energy intensity index—an extension of index decomposition analysis. Energy Economics, 34(2012), 171–176.Google Scholar
  5. Ang, B. W., & Liu, F. L. (2001). A new decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation. Energy, 26, 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ang, B. W., & Su, B. (2011). Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Economics, 34(2012), 177–188.Google Scholar
  7. Bashmakov, I.A. (2004a). Housing and utility reform: are we doing wrong what we intended, or have we intended wrong what we are doing? Energosberezheniye, no. 5 and 6, 2004.Google Scholar
  8. Bashmakov, I.A. (2004b). Thresholds of residents’ ability and willingness to pay their municipal utilities bills. Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 4, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. Bashmakov, I.A. (2007). Three laws of energy transitions. Energy Policy, July 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Bashmakov, I.A. (2013). Evaluation of target indicators of Russia Federal energy efficiency program. Energosberezheniye, no. 4, 2004, pp. 10–18.Google Scholar
  11. Bashmakov, I. A., & Bashmakov, V. I. (2012). Comparison of Russia industrial energy efficiency measures with measures implemented in developed countries. Promyshlennaya Energetika, 11, 2–11. http://cenef.ru/file/comparison.pdf (in Russian).Google Scholar
  12. Bataille, C., Nyboer, J. (2005). Improvements of the OEE/DPAD decomposition methodology. M.K. Jaccard and Associates for Natural Resource Canada’s Office of Energy Efficiency (OEE). March 25, 2005.Google Scholar
  13. Boyd, G. A., & Roop, J. M. (2004). A note on the Fisher ideal index decomposition for structural change in energy intensity. The Energy Journal, 25(1), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyd, G. A., McDonald, J. F., Ross, M., & Manson, D. A. (1987). Separating the changing composition of US manufacturing production from energy efficiency improvements: a Divisia index approach. The Energy Journal, 8(2), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cahill, C., & Ó Gallachóir, B. P. (2010). Monitoring energy efficiency trends in European industry: which top-down method should be used? Energy Policy, 38(11), 6910–6918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cahill, C., & Ó Gallachóir, B. P. (2011). Combining physical and economic output data to analyse energy and CO2 emissions trends in industry. Energy Policy, 49, 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cahill, C., Bazilian, M., & Gallachóir, B. P. Ó. (2010). Comparing ODEX with LMDI to measure energy efficiency trends. Energy Efficiency, 3, 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Champion, T., Lehtonen, M., Sorrell, S., Stapleton, L., Pujol, J. (2008). Energy use in UK road freight: a decomposition analysis. July 2008. Sussex Energy Group, SPRU, University of Sussex. Toby Champion Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Divisia, F. (1925). L’indice monetary et la theorie de la monnaie. Revue d’Economie Politique, 1925(2), 109–135.Google Scholar
  20. Enerdata. (2013). Global energy statistical yearbook (free online interactive application) http://yearbook.enerdata.net/.
  21. Schipper, L., Unander, F., Marie-Lilliu, C. (2000). The IEA energy indicators effort: increasing the understanding of the energy/emissions link. IEA Public Information Office, 9 rue de la Federation, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, http://www.iea.org/envissu/cop6/eneinl.pdf. Accessed Apr 2012.
  22. Vartia, Y. O. (1976). Ideal log-change index numbers. Scandinavian Statistics, 3, 121–126.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Voigt, S., et al. (2014). Energy intensity developments in 40 major economies: structural change or technology improvement? Energy Economics, 41, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Energy EfficiencyMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations