Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The policy instruments of European front-runners: effective for saving energy in existing dwellings?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing dwellings receive frequent attention in climate change policy given the wealth of cost-effective, but un-exploited, energy-saving potential within their walls. Policy attention also recognises the need for instruments that can navigate around barriers and maximise opportunities to achieve deep carbon reductions. However, there is a lack of evidence and knowledge about the instruments that can boast of success. In response to this knowledge gap, the instruments that form the main policy response to reduce energy consumed for space and water heating in existing dwellings in several front-runner European countries are assessed. Aims are to include, and to go beyond, an understanding of effectiveness based on reported reductions in CO2 emissions and/or monetary savings on energy bills. Effectiveness is also judged on the basis of how instruments reflect policy instrument and energy policy concepts drawn from literature. Results show that the instruments that define action of front-runners differ significantly. Front-runners fail to reconcile all the identified concepts in their main instruments but some feature strongly. In this regard, selected countries established their main instruments over two decades ago, reflecting the concept of long-term instrument development and support. However, few front-runners adequately monitor and evaluate instruments to illuminate cause and effect. Front-runners struggle to diversify their core instrument approaches to capture ‘hard to reach households’ such as the private rental sector and lower-income households. The divergence in the instruments that form the main policy response of front-runners allows for the characteristics of a range of instruments to be analysed including regulations, information tools, taxes and incentives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. European Union Member States are committed to 2020 targets: obligatory 20 % reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and 20 % increase in energy from renewable sources and an indicative 20 % improvement in energy efficiency.

  2. Measures are considered cost-effective if annual saving multiplied by the lifetime divided by the investment is greater than 1.33 (DMEBA 2010, p. 136)

  3. “.. building works on the building envelope or installations which affect more than 25 % of the building envelope, or whose value is higher than 25 % of the value of the latest public property valuation, excluding the value of the plot” (DMEBA 2010, p. 140).

References

  • Adjei, A. et al. (2011). Deliverable 5.2. A study of homeowners energy efficiency improvements & the impact of the EPC. Available at: http://www.ideal-epbd.eu/. Accessed October 2011.

  • Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., et al. (1998). Carrots, sticks & sermons: policy instruments & their evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, B. (2007). Home truths: a low-carbon strategy to reduce UK housing emissions by 80% by 2050. Available at: http://www.foe.co.uk/hometruths. Accessed November 2011.

  • BPIE (2011). Europe’s buildings under the microscope: a country-by-country review of the energy performance of buildings. Available at: http://bpie.eu. Accessed November 2011.

  • BRE (2008). Energy analysis focus report, a study of hard to treat homes using the English house condition survey, part I: dwelling and household characteristics of hard to treat homes. Available at: http://www.bre.co.uk. Accessed October 2011.

  • McKinsey & Company (2009). Pathways to a low carbon economy, version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement curve. Available at: https://solutions.mckinsey.com/. Accessed November 2009.

  • DECC (2009). Impact assessment of the electricity and gas (carbon emissions reduction) (amendment) order 2009. Available at: http://www.decc.gov.uk. Accessed October 2011.

  • DECC (2010a). Warm homes, greener homes: a strategy for household energy management. Available at: http://www.decc.gov.uk. Accessed October 2011.

  • DECC (2010b). Insulation for the Nation-3.5 million more homes to be lagged. Press Release PN10/75 10 June 2010. Available at: http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/news/pn10_075/pn10_075.aspx. Accessed August 2011.

  • DECC (2011). Energy Act 2011. Available at: http://www.decc.gov.uk. Accessed November 2011.

  • DMCE (Danish Ministry of Climate and Energy) (2011). Energy Strategy 2050- from coal, oil and gas to green energy. Available at http://www.amblissabon.um.dk. Accessed September 2011.

  • DMEBA (Danish Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs) (2010). Building Regulations. Available at: http://www.ebst.dk. Accessed October 2011.

  • DMTE (Danish Ministry of Transport and Energy) (2005). Action plan for renewed energy conservation: energy conservation and the market. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/demand/legislation/doc/neeap. Accessed August 2011.

  • Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2009). Synthesis of the complete assessment of all 27 national energy efficiency action plans as required by Directive 2006/32/EC on energy end-use efficiency and energy services [SEC(2009) 889]. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/end-use_en.htm. Accessed August 2011.

  • EC (2011). Commission Staff Working Paper Impact Assessment, accompanying the document Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy efficiency and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/. Accessed November 2011.

  • ECEEE (European Council for Energy Efficient Economy) (2010). ECEEE response to Commission consultation for Energy Strategy for Europe 2011–2020. Available at: http://www.eceee.org/eceees_views/energy_strategy. Accessed November 2011.

  • EEW (Energy Efficiency Watch) (2009). Final report on the evaluation of national energy efficiency action plans. Available at http://www.energy-efficiency-watch.org/index.php?id=90. Accessed August 2012.

  • Eliadis, P., Hill, M., & Howlett, M. (2005). Designing government: from instruments to governance. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelund-Thomsen, K. et al. (2009). Thresholds related to renovation of building: EPBD definitions and rules. Available at: http://www.sbi.dk. Accessed October 2011.

  • Fairey, P., Goldstein, D. (2006). Getting it right matters: why efficiency incentives should be based on performance and not cost. Proceedings of 2006 ACEEE Summer Study, Washington DC, 13–18 August 2006, vol (8), pp. 64–75.

  • Fouche, G. (2008). Sweden’s carbon-tax solution to climate change puts it top of the green list. The Guardian, 29 April 2008.

  • Fuller, M. et al. (2010). Driving demand for home energy improvements: motivating residential customers to invest in comprehensive upgrades that eliminate energy waste, avoid high bills and spur the economy. Available at: http://eetd.lbl.gov/news-archives/news-driving-demand.html. Accessed December 2011.

  • Galvin, R. (2010). Thermal upgrades of existing homes in Germany: the building code, subsidies, and economic efficiency. Energy and Buildings, 42, 834–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gram-Hanssen, K. & Christensen, T. H. (2011). Energy efficiency in existing detached housing Danish experiences with different policy instruments. Available at: http://www.sbi.dk. Accessed October 2011.

  • Gram-Hanssen, K., et al. (2007). Do homeowners use energy labels? A comparison between Denmark and Belgium. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2879–2888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra Santin, O. (2010). Actual energy consumption in dwellings: the effect of energy performance regulations and occupant behaviour. Amsterdam: IOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart regulation: designing environmental policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. (2010). A comparison of energy efficiency programmes for existing homes in eleven countries. Available at http://www.raponline.org/Feature.asp?select=144. Accessed September 2010.

  • HCCLGC (House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee) (2008). Existing housing and climate change: seventh report of session 2007–08. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/. Accessed August 2011.

  • Högberg, M. (2007). Energy efficiency policies and measures in Sweden 2006: monitoring of energy efficiency in EU 15 and Norway (Odyssee-Mure). Available at: http://www.odyssee-indicators.org/. Accessed December 2011.

  • Höhne, N. et al. (2009). Scorecards on the best and worst policies for a green new deal. Available at: http://www.e3g.org/programmes/climate-articles/scorecards-on-best-and-worst-policies-for-a-green-new-deal/. Accessed August 2011.

  • Howlett, M. (2004). Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: instrument mixes, implementation styles, and second generation theories of policy instrument choice. Policy and Society, 23(2), 1–17.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2010). Designing public policies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itard, L., & Meijer, F. (2008). Towards a sustainable Northern European housing stock: figures, facts and future. Amsterdam: IOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, O., & Lodge, M. (2003). The limitations of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ for public policy research. Political Studies Review, 1(2), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke, M. (2005). Trendsetters in environmental policy: the character and role of pioneer countries. European Environment, 15(2), 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joelsson, A., & Gustavsson, L. (2008). Perspectives on implementing energy efficiency in existing Swedish detached houses. Energy Policy, 36(1), 84–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, B. (2000). Economic instruments in practice 1: carbon tax in Sweden. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/document/8/0,3746,en_2649_34499_1897096_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed November 2011.

  • Joosen, S. and Zegers, F. (2006). Cross-country evaluation of energy performance certificates. Available at http://www.docstoc.com/docs/50376202/Cross-Country-Evaluation-of-Energy-Performance-Certification--energy-saving-house. Accessed August 2012.

  • Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2000). ‘Greening’ the European Union: what can be learned from the ‘leaders’ of EU Environmental Policy. European Environment, 10, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KfW Bankengruppe (2010). Supporting the energy efficient rehabilitation of the building stock—the German experience. Available at: http://www.resourcesaver.com. Accessed October 2011.

  • KfW Bankengruppe (2011). Housing, home modernisation and energy conservation. Available at: http://www.kfw.de. Accessed viewed October 2011.

  • Khan, J. (2006). Evaluation of the local energy advice programme in Sweden: within the framework of the AID-EE project. Available at: http://www.aid-ee.org/. Accessed November 2011.

  • Kiss, B., & Neij, L. (2011). The importance of learning when supporting emergent technologies for energy efficiency—a case study on policy intervention for learning for the development of energy efficient windows in Sweden. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6514–6524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjærbye, V.H. (2008). Does energy labeling on residential housing cause energy savings? Proceedings of ECEEE 2009 Summer Study, 1–6 June 2009 La Colle sur Loup, France, pp. 527–37.

  • Korytarova, K. (2006). Evaluation of KfW soft loans for building modernisation within the framework of the AID-EE Project. Available at: http://aid-ee.org/. Accessed August 2011.

  • Laustsen, J. and Lorenzen, K. (2003). Danish experience in energy labelling of buildings. Available at: http://web.archive.org/. Accessed October 2011.

  • Lees, E. (2008), Report to DECC “Evaluation of the Energy Efficiency Commitment 2005–08”. Available at http://hes.decc.gov.uk/references/. Accessed August 2011.

  • Liefferink, D., & Andersen, M. S. (1998). Strategies of the ‘green’ member states in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(2), 254–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S., & Peters, G. (1989). Instruments of government: perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfström, E., & Palm, J. (2008). Visualizing household energy use in the interest of developing sustainable energy systems. Housing Studies, 23(6), 935–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra, K., et al. (2011). Swedish energy advisors’ perceptions regarding and suggestions for fulfilling homeowner expectations [online publication]. Energy Policy. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.043.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, K and Neij, P. (2009). Experience of policy instruments for energy efficiency in buildings in the Nordic countries. Available at: http://www.cerbof.se/. Accessed November 2011.

  • Ministry of Sustainable Development (2006). National programme for energy efficiency and energy smart construction: government bill 2005/06:145 fact sheet. Available at: http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/574/a/63635. Accessed June 2009.

  • Mlecnik, E., et al. (2010). Barriers and opportunities for labels for highly energy-efficient houses. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4592–4603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, G. et al. (2011). Policy instruments to promote building energy efficiency from an end-user point of view. Proceedings of ECEEE 2011 Summer Study, 6–11 June 2011 Belambra Presqu’ile de Giens, France, pp. 1751–8.

  • Nässén, J., & Holmberg, J. (2005). Energy efficiency—a forgotten goal in the Swedish building sector. Energy Policy, 31, 1037–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff, K. et al. (2011). Meeting energy concept targets for residential retrofits in Germany: economic viability, financial support, and energy savings. Available at: http://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org. Accessed September 2011.

  • OECD/IEA (2008). Energy policies of IEA countries—Sweden—2008 review. Available at http://www.iea.org/publicationsfree_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=2023. Accessed August 2012.

  • OECD/IEA and AFD (2008). Promoting energy efficiency investments: case studies in the residential sector. Available at: http://www.iea.org/w/bookshop/add.aspx?id=326. Accessed July 2011.

  • Ofgem (2011). A review of the third year of the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target (CERT). Available at: http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/. Accessed September 2011.

  • Palm, J. (2010). The public–private divide in household behavior. How far into the home can energy guidance reach? Energy Policy, 38, 2858–2864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parag, Y., & Darby, S. (2009). Consumer–supplier–government triangular relations: rethinking the UK policy path for carbon emissions reduction from the UK residential Sector article on Energy Policy website. Energy Policy, 37(10), 3984–3992. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.044#View.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, A., et al. (2009). Bridge over trouble water—spanning the energy-efficiency gap. Proceedings of ECEEE 2009 Summer Study, 1–6 June 2009 La Colle sur Loup, France, pp. 75–81.

  • Rose, R. (2001). Ten steps in learning lessons from abroad, ESRC future governance programme [discussion paper]. Available at: http://www.hull.ac.uk/futgov/. Accessed June 2009.

  • Rosenow, J. (2011). Different paths of change: Home energy efficiency policy in Britain and Germany. In Proceedings of ECEEE 2011 Summer Study, 6–11 June 2011 Belambra Presqu’ile de Giens, France, pp. 261–272.

  • Rosenow, J. (2012). Energy saving obligations in the UK—a history of change. Energy Policy, 49, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovers, R. (2008). Sustainable housing projects: implementing a conceptual approach. Amsterdam: Techne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (2002). The tools of government: a guide to the new governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The Journal of Politics, 52, 510–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, M. et al. (2011). The KfW experience in the reduction of energy use in & CO2 emissions from buildings: operation, impacts and lessons for the UK. Available at: http://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/energy/. Accessed February 2012.

  • SOU (2011). Second national energy efficiency action plan—Sweden. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/end-use_en.htm. Accessed November 2011.

  • Sprei, F. et al. (2006). Experience from energy efficiency policies in Sweden during the last 30 years: looking at the building sector. ACEEE Summer Study, 13–18 August 2006 Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, CA, (8), pp. 277–288.

  • Stern, P. C., et al. (1986). The effectiveness of incentives for residential energy conservation. Evaluation Review, 10, 147–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Togeby, M. et al. (2009). Danish energy efficiency policy: revisited and future improvements. In Proceedings of ECEEE 2009 Summer Study, 1–6 June 2009 La Colle sur Loup, France, pp. 299–310.

  • Ürge-Vorsatz, D., et al. (2007). Appraisal of policy instruments for reducing buildings CO2 emissions. Building Research & Information, 35(4), 458–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A et al. (2011). Dangers and unintended consequences of siloed renewable energy and energy efficiency policymaking: evidence from the UK. In Proceedings of ECEEE 2011 Summer Study, 6–11 June 2011 Belambra Presqu’ile de Giens, France, pp. 137–144.

  • WBCSD (2009). Energy efficiency in buildings: transforming the market. Available at: http://www.wbcsd.org/Pages/EDocument/EDocumentDetails.aspx?ID=11006. Accessed January 2012.

  • Wilhite, H. & Norgard, J. (2003). A case of self-deception in energy policy. In Proceedings of the 2003 ECEEE Sumer Study 2–7 June 2003, Saint-Raphaël, France, pp. 249–57.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Ms. Kirsten Engelund-Thomsen, Mr. Tobias Schleicher, Mr. Peter Hofmann, Dr. Eoin Lees, Ms. Chandi Patel, Ms. Agneta Persson and Ms. Kristina Mjörnell for verifying and clarifying information and providing additional data on the policy instruments used in their countries. Thanks to the reviewers of this paper for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OTB Research Institute of the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Lorraine Murphy

Authors
  1. Lorraine Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorraine Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, L. The policy instruments of European front-runners: effective for saving energy in existing dwellings?. Energy Efficiency 7, 285–301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-013-9224-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-013-9224-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation