Abstract
This paper deals with a detailed investigation of the effects of various metal oxide nanoparticles on unsteady stagnation point flow of a hybrid base fluid impinging on a flat surface. The ‘single-phase’ nanofluid model, i.e., the Tiwari and Das model, is considered for the study. We consider water and ethylene glycol in 1:1 ratio as the base fluid and four different types of metal oxides, namely, CuO, TiO\(_{\mathrm {2}}\), ZnO and MgO as the nanoparticles. Using similarity transformations, the conservation equations are transformed into self-similar ordinary differential equations. Dual and unique similarity solutions are obtained for certain set of values of parameters. The analysis explores many important findings. Dual self-similar solutions exist up to a certain critical value of the decelerating unsteady parameter and the critical value is independent of the type of metal oxide nanoparticles considered. The strongest surface drag force is observed for the nanofluid with CuO nanoparticles, while the weakest is for the nanofluid with MgO nanoparticles. The heat transfer rate is highest for the nanofluid with CuO nanoparticles and lowest for the nanofluid with TiO\(_{\mathrm {2}}\) nanoparticles. Also, the boundary layer is thickest for the nanofluid with MgO nanoparticles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S U S Choi, Developments and applications of non-Newtonian flows edited by D A Siginer and H P Wang (ASME, New York, 1995) Vol. 66, pp. 99–105
S Lee, S U S Choi, S Li and J A Eastman, ASME J. Heat Transf. 121, 280 (1999)
H U Kang, S H Kim and J M Oh, Exp. Heat Transf. 19, 181 (2006)
J Buongiorno, ASME J. Heat Transf. 128, 240 (2006)
R K Tiwari and M K Das, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 50, 2002 (2007)
A Ebrahimi, F Rikhtegar, A Sabaghan and E Roohi, Energy 101, 190 (2006)
C Pang, J Y Jung and Y T Kang, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 72, 392 (2014)
E Firouzfar, M Soltanieh, S H Noie and S H Saidi, Appl. Therm. Eng. 31, 1543 (2011)
E C Wang and A Z Wang, Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 6, 9 (2014)
M S Patil, S C Kin, J-H Seo and M-Y Lee, Energies 9, 22 (2016)
N A Che Sidik, N G Y Cheong and A Fazeli, Appl. Mech. Mater. 695, 539 (2015)
E Abu-Nada and H F Oztop, Numer. Heat Transf. Part A: Appl. 59, 403 (2011)
M Sheikholeslami and D D Ganji, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 37, 895 (2015)
A Malvandi and D D Ganji, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 362, 172 (2014)
R Ahmed and M Mustafa, J. Mol. Liq. 220, 635 (2016)
Kh Hosseinzadeh, A J Amiri, S S Ardahaie and D D Ganji, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 10, 595 (2017)
R Derakhshan, A Shojaei, Kh Hosseinzadeh, M Nimafar and D D Ganji, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 14, 100439 (2019)
M R Zangooee, Kh Hosseinzadeh and D D Ganji, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 14, 100460 (2019)
Kh Hosseinzadeh, A Asadi, A R Mogharrebi, J Khalesi, S Mousavisani and D D Ganji, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 14, 100482 (2019)
Kh Hosseinzadeh, M Gholinia, B Jafari, A Ghanbarpour, H Olfian and D D Ganji, Heat Transf. Asian Res. 48(2), 744 (2019)
M Gholinia, Kh Hosseinzadeh, H Mehrzadi, D D Ganji and A A Ranjbar, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 13, 100356 (2019)
M Khan, M Irfan and W A Khan, Pramana – J. Phys. 92: 17 (2019)
S Ghosh and S Mukhopadhyay, Pramana – J. Phys. 92: 93 (2019)
A Shojaei, A J Amiri, S S Ardahaie, Kh Hosseinzadeh and D D Ganji, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 13, 100384 (2019)
M I Khan, S Qayyum, S Farooq, T Hayat and A Alsaedi, Pramana – J. Phys. 93: 62 (2019)
Kh Hosseinzadeh, A R Mogharrebi, A Asadi, M Paikar and D D Ganji, J. Mol. Liq. 300, 112347 (2020)
S Ghosh and S Mukhopadhyay, Pramana – J. Phys. 94: 61 (2020)
A K Gautam, A K Verma, K Bhattacharyya and A Banerjee, Pramana – J. Phys. 94: 108 (2020)
Kh Hosseinzadeh, A Asadi, A R Mogharrebi, M E Azari and D D Ganji, J Therm. Anal. Calorim. (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09347-x
N Bachok, A Ishak and I Pop, Boundary Value Prob. 39, 13 (2013)
K Bhattacharyya, Ain Shams Eng. J. 4, 259 (2013)
N C Peddisetty, Pramana – J. Phys. 87: 62 (2016)
S S Ghadikolaei, M Yassari, H Sadeghi, Kh Hosseinzadeh and D D Ganji, Powder Technol. 322, 428 (2017)
A Akhgar and D Toghraie, Powder Technol. 338, 806 (2018)
M A Esfahani and D Toghraie, J. Mol. Liq. 232, 105 (2017)
M S Uddin, A Zaib and K Bhattacharyya, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 58, 670 (2017)
M Sheikholeslami and D D Ganji, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 2748 (2017)
M Gholinia, S Gholinia, Kh Hosseinzadeh and D D Ganji, Res. Phys. 9, 1525 (2018)
S S Ghadikolaei, Kh Hosseinzadeh and D D Ganji, World J. Eng. 16(1), 51 (2019)
N Bachok, A Ishak and I Pop, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 55, 6499 (2012)
P D Weidman, D G Kubitschek and A M J Davis, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 44, 730 (2006)
S A Bakar, N M Arifin, F M Ali, N Bachok and R Nazar, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 890, 012041 (2017)
Acknowledgements
The works of A K Pandey (09/013(0742)/2018-EMR-I) and S Rajput (09/013(0843)/2018-EMR-I) are supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, Ministry of Human Resources Development of India Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pandey, A.K., Rajput, S., Bhattacharyya, K. et al. Impact of metal oxide nanoparticles on unsteady stagnation point flow of the hybrid base fluid along a flat surface. Pramana - J Phys 95, 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-020-02029-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-020-02029-1
Keywords
- Metal oxide nanoparticles
- hybrid base fluid
- dual solutions
- stability analysis
- unsteady stagnation-point flow