Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

\(^{16}\hbox {C}\)-elastic scattering examined using several models at different energies

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper, the first results concerning the theoretical analysis of the \(^{16}\hbox {C} + \hbox {p}\) reaction by investigating two elastic scattering angular distributions measured at high energy compared to low energy for this system are reported. Several models for the real part of the nuclear potential are tested within the optical model formalism. The imaginary potential has a Woods–Saxon shape with three free parameters. Two types of density distribution and three different cluster structures for \(^{16}\hbox {C}\) are assumed in the analysis. The results are compared with each other as well as with the experimental data to give evidence of the importance of these studied items.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I Tanihata, J. Phys. G 22, 157 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. K Riisager et al, Europhys. Lett. 49, 547 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. T Bumann et al, Phys. Lett. B 439, 256 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. C Wu et al, Nucl. Phys. A 739, 3 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A Ozawa et al, Nucl. Phys. A 691, 599 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. G Audi, O Bersillon, J Blachot and A H Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 624, 1 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. T Zheng et al, Nucl. Phys. A 709, 103 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. H Wuosmaa et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 132501 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M Wiedeking et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 152501 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Z Elekes et al, Phys. Lett. B 586, 34 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. P J Leask, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. B 27, 9 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N I Ashwood et al, Phys. Rev. C 70, 0644607 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M Freer et al, Phys. Rev. C 84, 034317 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. I Lombardo et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods: Phys. Res. B 302, 19 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M Freer et al, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054324 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. T Baba, Y Chiba and M Kimura, Phys. Rev. C 90, 064319 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. W Von Oertzen, M Freer and Y Kanada-En’yo, Phys. Rep. 432, 43 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S N Ershov et al, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1483 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. L Grassi et al, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 381, 012088 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S Terashima et al, RIKEN Accel. Prog. Rep. 47, xviii (2014)

  21. J Cook, Comput. Phys. Commun. 25, 125 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. G R Satchler and W G Love, Phys. Rep. 55, 183 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. L Chamon et al, Phys. Rev. C 66, 014610 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. L Chamon et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(26), 5218 (1997)

  25. S Ilieva, Investigation of the nuclear matter density distributions of the exotic \(^{12}\) Be, \(^{14}\) Be and \(^{8}\) B nuclei by elastic proton scattering in inverse kinematics, Ph.D. thesis (Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat, Mainz, 2008)

  26. G D Alkhazov et al, Nucl. Phys. A 712, 269 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. M P Bush, J S Al-Khalili, J A Tostevin and R C Johnson, Phys. Rev. C 53, 3009 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. G D Alkhazov, I S Novikov and Yu M Shabelski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20, 583 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. I Tanihata et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2676 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. I Tanihata et al, Phys. Lett. B 206, 592 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. I Tanihata et al, Phys. Lett. B 289, 261 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. P D Kunz, Spot.colorado.edu/\(\sim \)kunz/DWBA.html, University of Colorado (unpublished)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Damanhur University, Damanhour, Egypt

    M N El-hammamy

  2. Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

    A Attia

Authors
  1. M N El-hammamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Attia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M N El-hammamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-hammamy, M.N., Attia, A. \(^{16}\hbox {C}\)-elastic scattering examined using several models at different energies. Pramana - J Phys 90, 66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1554-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1554-9

Keywords

PACS Nos

Search

Navigation